Yeah, I'm sure kids who want to vape will get 0 nic. They use e-nic to get a buzz. Contrary to popular belief on this forum, nicotine use really isn't healthy.
Drinking a glass of wine a day has been found to be healthy. Should children be allowed to buy wine? How about guns? If a 13 year old can drive a car, should they be allowed to?
Sorry, but your argument is flawed.
If a kid who has never used a tobacco product wants to vape, what makes you think it's for the nicotine? The kid would have no idea what nicotine does. That means they are drawn to it for different reasons such as it looking cool or peer pressure. And if the kids are nicotine users that want a nic fix, what's the problem with letting them vape it? I assure you, it would be a lot safer than the other options they have available.
Furthermore, by banning vaping outright, including the 0 nic juices, you now run the risk of the kid vaping anyway with nic juice just because that's what is most available. How many 0 nic users do you know? A kid that wants to vape is going to vape whether or not it's legal. By closing the door on the option to obtain 0 nic easily, you only leave the one for nic wide open. But sure, making it legal will surely draw kids who wouldn't even think about it if it were illegal. But again, if they are vaping 0 nic, what's the big deal?
Let's face it, the reason is that society cannot stomach the sight of kids vaping. The negative stigma surrounding anything smoked is too etched into our minds.
Your analogies don't work in this context either. Alcohol impairs the brain's functioning. Nicotine does not. Alcohol is a major player in mortality rates (of self and innocent bystanders). Nicotine is not. Guns in the wrong hands have a high risk of accidental suicide or accidental murder. Nicotine does not for the most part (there's a chance the kid can just drink the nic juice). Should a 13 year old be allowed to drive? Sure, if they can pass all the necessary testing why not? We allow seniors with less reflexes and senses than the average 13 year old to drive. Age restrictions for the most part are completely arbitrary. There are age ranges where things like alcohol will cause you more harm, but the 21 restriction isn't based on that. There are age ranges where you are more of a hazard on the road, but the 18 (in America) age limit isn't based on that.
There's no black-and-white answer to this issue. But me personally? I think 0 nic juices shouldn't have restrictions... well at least when these things get better testing and regulations.
I have a feeling that even if it's not required to have an age limit for 0 nic juice, shop owners will voluntarily set one. Might not be 18, but I definitely don't think they will be selling to a 9 year old. But hey, what is that 9 year old doing in a vape shop without a parent anyway?