" BT isn't going to help create an ecig market unless they can get the 5$ to $10 a day they currently get from each smoker."
Um, BT earns about roughly a few cents on each ciggarette (I used to work for british american tobacco). The government takes most of the money. I dont think anybody smokes 200-500 ciggarettes a day!
I don't really see a overt public voter justification for taxing e-cigs, although I am realistic if smoking drops off they will want to tax _something_ (booze, sugar, petrol, e-cigs - I am not sure its obvious what exactly that is. Usually taxes are levied on things people feel guilty or negatively toward. In this respect nothing rivels smoking, nor can likely be villanised as much. It seems likely multiple "vices" will have to take its place at a lower tax rate in order to replace lost smoking taxes)
- but even if a tax was levied on e-cigs it couldn't be high. If vaping was as big as smoking, re-fill liquids or pre-filled cartos, there would be _plenty_ money to be made tax or no tax, especially compared with the measely margins involved now on tobacco smoking, that are only compensated by the large volume of sales...
It remains to be seen, in what form, and with what practice BT will take when joining the party, but I still see it as positive that some BT companies are putting their chips on our side of the fence, investing in their future...its contrasted with tobacco companies that are actively resisting the inevitable future, -RJR - and they most certianly are a problem as they are fighting against e-cigs with lobby money etc...