Babies cry and nicotine has been known to relax people...
It seems that the parents weren't present and a babysitter was supposed to be taking care of the baby.
Last edited by a moderator:
Babies cry and nicotine has been known to relax people...
It seems that the parents weren't present and a babysitter was supposed to be taking care of the baby.
I have seen and heard of babysitters doing horrible things to children they were watching...
Well any parent who lets a 1 year old get their hands on nicotine should be locked up, nicotine is only dangerous to the very young as you can't swallow enough when your older without vomiting. So yes it should be locked away from the very young the same as bleach and the 100 other household chemicals that can potentially kill anyone not just the very young.
The child was not with the parent/s.
Lawmakers approved a bill back in June that would prohibit the sale of liquid nicotine to minors.
Both articles linked in this thread contain the following:
Phew! I'm glad lawmakers are on top of these 1 year olds who are trying to circumvent the existing laws.
On a more serious note (though my comment above isn't entirely light hearted given articles' choice to note that in a case such as this), I think child proof caps could've helped here. I also have purchased a few eLiquid bottles that had child proof packaging and/or caps. I'd rather have the option as one who doesn't have kids nor live in a place where kids are around. Sometime childproof caps are annoying to adults. And if we are being honest, a parent / guardian who is acting irresponsibly (by not keeping childproof cap on a bottle when children are present), then it won't really matter how the bottle/cap is made if the problem is simply, cap was left off while toddler was present.
Why is it that an arsonist, robber, murderer etc. is "suspected" even when caught by video and/or witnesses, yet in this story, and many like it, before anything is confirmed by specialist (sorry, a police office is not a specialist in these type of cases...) it's the nicotine that has done the deed?
My condolences for the loss of a child, but still...
Whats next, kids drinking gasoline??
Oh wait.... Kid Drinks Gasoline To Be More Like the Transformers - /Film
Wisconsin child dies, 2nd hospitalized after drinking gasoline - TwinCities.com
Time to shut down the oil refineries.
![]()
"However, police said half a teaspoon of the pure liquid can kill a child. Lawmakers approved a bill back in June that would prohibit the sale of liquid nicotine to minors."
Another example of great reporting... Both of these statements have no place in this story(unless, against all odds, it was actually PURE nicotine).
Well, If the Police said it, it has to be true. ...right?
"However, police said half a teaspoon of the pure liquid can kill a child. Lawmakers approved a bill back in June that would prohibit the sale of liquid nicotine to minors."
Another example of great reporting... Both of these statements have no place in this story(unless, against all odds, it was actually PURE nicotine).
But do you really think anything else will come out? You've got the dead child, nicotine has been blamed, headlines blared... it's done. Usually with these types of stories, that's the end of it. When an actual cause of death is known, they don't publish follow-up stories. I mean, unless they determine intentional harm but even then, it will still be 'death by e-liquid'.24 hour rule time, I'm waiting until something besides rumors and headlines come out to even start forming an opinion.
24 hour rule time, I'm waiting until something besides rumors and headlines come out to even start forming an opinion.