***California Assembly bill to BAN SHIPMENT OF E CIGARETTES TO ANYONE IN CALIFORNIA***

Status
Not open for further replies.

sonicdsl

Wandering life's highway
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 11, 2011
17,744
19,245
I am happy to say that a major organization formally voted to oppose this bill today:

Motion for CAADE Board
Re: AB 1500 (Dickinson) Position: OPPOSE UNLESS AMENDED 1/18/2014: PASSED

AB 1500 seeks to ban all internet/mail order sales of tobacco products and electronic cigarettes while allowing for online sales of alcohol.

The California Association for Alcohol/Drug Educators (CAADE) opposes AB 1500 unless the prohibition of sales of electronic cigarettes is removed for the following reasons:

1. Because they are used primarily as a tool for smoking cessation, electronic cigarettes (“ecigs”) are a public benefit, rather than a public hazard, as the bill suggests.
2. Although there needs to be more research done, the current science overwhelmingly shows ecigs to be at least 99 times safer than tobacco cigarettes.
3. Current research shows that there is no evidence that ecigs pose a significant risk to the user or to bystanders.
4. As addiction experts on the front lines of fighting addiction to smoking we believe this will lesson our ability to help smokers switch to an alternative that is proving to be an effective harm reduction strategy and a win-win for smokers and society.
5. The tobacco and pharmaceutical industries will gain from the passage of this bill, and efforts to effectively help smokers quit will be diminished.
6. We support use other age verification methods that would keep minors from online purchasing of tobacco, electronic cigarettes and alcohol.

At the 4/18/2013 Board meeting CAADE reaffirmed our official position:
The California Association for Alcohol & Drug Educators (CAADE) supports efforts by the addiction treatment community to utilize its treatment expertise in developing tobacco cessation tools that include both abstinence-based and medication-assisted treatment, including the use of electronic cigarettes.

CAADE accredits addiction studies programs in over 40 colleges and universities in California, Arizona and Nevada. It also issues the highest level of addiction counselor certification in California, and currently represents more than 6000 counselors, college faculty members and students.

For more information please contact:
Fr. Jack Kearney, M.Div., CATC IV, CATE
frintervention @ gmail.com

Father Kearney's awesome... and he's a vaper himself! :)
 
Last edited:

rothenbj

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2009
8,285
7,707
Green Lane, Pa
I'd prefer government would just keep its nose out of vaping entirely, neither prohibiting or mandating anything at all. Note that the concessions that sell things in airports and train stations are private businesses. Where does the notion that anyone can mandate that they must carry and offer to sell a particular category of products come from? Will you settle just for cig-a-likes or will you insist on a full line of stuff including mods, RBAs, Kanthal wire and wick? How many flavors of juice would you insist they offer? Sorry, but these businesses are perfectly capable of deciding what there's a market for without any help from our ever-benevolent government.

I like the thought, however the FDA has another thunk.
 

Idaholandho

Gone Fishin'
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 8, 2012
7,379
23,171
Reading Naked
I DON'T UNDERSTAND. Why are we debating this here? Dickinson and his ilk are not reading this post! The only people they are listening to is the ALA ANTZ and BIG PHARMA, and they don't care about any petition. We need to call them, and tell them in their ear that what they are doing IS WRONG, and let them know if they don't straighten out we will do what ever we can and spend MONEY to oppose them and take away their seat.

Don't be all talk and no action, or we all are screwed! Call or CRY, it's up to you. It's easy and don't be afraid to show how angry and passionate you are about this. That's the only way to let them know that we won't stop until they do the moral thing to help to save millions of lives!!!!!!!
Educated and a political enthusiast, I call this an informative learning and a potential guide for many to plan.
On June 12, 1957, Surgeon General Leroy E. Burney declared it the official position of the U.S. Public Health Service that the evidence pointed to a relationship between smoking and lung cancer. That's hardly hiding and lying ..
Can't tell if your serious. I pick not to shorten this discussion and my response.
 

Berylanna

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 13, 2012
2,043
3,287
south Bay Area, California
www.facebook.com
I'd prefer government would just keep its nose out of vaping entirely, neither prohibiting or mandating anything at all. Note that the concessions that sell things in airports and train stations are private businesses.

No way this stuff would pass in the places where the anti-vaping stuff is passing. But then, if they "split the difference" and vote for a "reasonable compromise" the compromise would be leave us the hell alone rather than build half a wall against us instead of a whole wall at once.

And they could not keep declaring our stories of vaping helping us irrelevant, or countering our arguments that vaping is good with "Well, we're not banning it, we're all for harm reduction, as long as ....[INSERT] half-wall [/(at least.)]

I'm reminded of how my sister routinely got rid of cops searching her house and poking around (she had a son on probation.)

Her usual method was to start asking them for all kinds of help and advice. One time when that didn't work she started trying to give them kittens. They always bailed real fast. THAT is what gov't does when you ask for help! (With the exception of Congressmen who help out military folks with the red tape.)
 

Jman8

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jan 15, 2013
6,419
12,928
Wisconsin
You know what might be interesting?

A little investigative reporting. Vapers going to office of these political folk with hidden camera, or audio, and finding out what they really think and/or just waiting for an inevitable slip up in whatever it is they have to say about vaping, when compared to smoking. Get about 4 to 8 of those type of interviews together, edit it into one program, upload it to that internet thing, and let it go viral.

Maybe throw in a few clips of people vaping indoors and no one even noticing, or no one complaining. Perhaps an occasional passerby's compliment on the smell.

Ya know, the reality that us vapors are use to. The one that general public has a right to know about.

We could call it vaping education 101.

(My proactive eCig advocate self likes to dream.
Let's see how they like dealing with underhanded tactics)
 

soba1

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
May 27, 2013
2,257
1,949
65
Van Nuys Ca., USA
Father Kearney's awesome... and he's a vaper himself! :)


For more information please contact:
Fr. Jack Kearney, M.Div., CATC IV, CATE
frintervention @ gmail.com

Oh God love them. Bless their hearts....gotta send them a thank you note....

Yes I just did........
Keep positive we got this one people.
I know it's haokey, but let's send out some
positive collective energy in our favor call it prayer visualization.
But let's send some energy as well seeing this Ab1500 going down
in defeat as it now stands.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Idaholandho

Gone Fishin'
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 8, 2012
7,379
23,171
Reading Naked
I'd prefer government would just keep its nose out of vaping entirely, neither prohibiting or mandating anything at all. Note that the concessions that sell things in airports and train stations are private businesses. Where does the notion that anyone can mandate that they must carry and offer to sell a particular category of products come from? Will you settle just for cig-a-likes or will you insist on a full line of stuff including mods, RBAs, Kanthal wire and wick? How many flavors of juice would you insist they offer? Sorry, but these businesses are perfectly capable of deciding what there's a market for without any help from our ever-benevolent government.

Unfortunately, this will never be the case. Look around you, the gov't regulates people which lends itself everything to include yourself. In regulating the sales of guns to vape gear ask yourself, are they regulating product or law abiding stand up citizens with no criminal history (us) from purchasing.
I, as well as many, feel we need Government. As veteran and law abiding US Citizen, I am not hell bent on bringing down the "suit curtain", just cleaning it up. The majority of the public sector is just tired of the bureaucratic mess. I support justice, unity, police protection and a Government set in place working within the laws of the Constitution.
But for ....s sake, look at the mess we have. When harden criminals walk the streets and rape and pillage at a high rate of speed and some ......... politician in Cali is concerned with e-juice or my son whom just graduated from West Point wasn't allowed to pray in high school, we have issues. We are an embarrassment to the world, financially and as once proud Nation that others looked to.
I just hope it gets cleaned up before Joe Q Public says, enough. is enough.
 
Last edited:

rothenbj

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2009
8,285
7,707
Green Lane, Pa
No way this stuff would pass in the places where the anti-vaping stuff is passing. But then, if they "split the difference" and vote for a "reasonable compromise" the compromise would be leave us the hell alone rather than build half a wall against us instead of a whole wall at once.

And they could not keep declaring our stories of vaping helping us irrelevant, or countering our arguments that vaping is good with "Well, we're not banning it, we're all for harm reduction, as long as ....[INSERT] half-wall [/(at least.)]

I'm reminded of how my sister routinely got rid of cops searching her house and poking around (she had a son on probation.)

Her usual method was to start asking them for all kinds of help and advice. One time when that didn't work she started trying to give them kittens. They always bailed real fast. THAT is what gov't does when you ask for help! (With the exception of Congressmen who help out military folks with the red tape.)

They've been building walls slowly ever since the first SG Report. They tried in '09 to build it all at once. Now they'll use the plan that's worked with cigarettes. A few bricks here and there each day and, in now time at all, you'll get where you wanyed to be in the first place. An indoor smoking ban here, a sales ban there, adult ID check somewhere else, some sin takes oxerthere. Fill in the gaps and they eventually get what they want, it just takes time.
 

soba1

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
May 27, 2013
2,257
1,949
65
Van Nuys Ca., USA
They've been building walls slowly ever since the first SG Report. They tried in '09 to build it all at once. Now they'll use the plan that's worked with cigarettes. A few bricks here and there each day and, in now time at all, you'll get where you wanyed to be in the first place. An indoor smoking ban here, a sales ban there, adult ID check somewhere else, some sin takes oxerthere. Fill in the gaps and they eventually get what they want, it just takes time.

It all worked because of a gullible population. Most people don't have a clue about the big picture. No one care really til their own ox is getting gored
 

DJLEC

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 12, 2013
2,230
9,341
Union City, California
Yes I just did........Keep positive we got this one people. I know it's haokey, but let's send out some positive collective energy in our favor call it prayer visualization. But let's send some energy as well seeing this Ab1500 going down in defeat as it now stands.

I also sent mine in.
 
Last edited:

MTFogger

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 3, 2014
157
208
North Carolina
I am happy to say that a major organization formally voted to oppose this bill today:

Motion for CAADE Board
Re: AB 1500 (Dickinson) Position: OPPOSE UNLESS AMENDED 1/18/2014: PASSED

AB 1500 seeks to ban all internet/mail order sales of tobacco products and electronic cigarettes while allowing for online sales of alcohol.

The California Association for Alcohol/Drug Educators (CAADE) opposes AB 1500 unless the prohibition of sales of electronic cigarettes is removed for the following reasons:

1. Because they are used primarily as a tool for smoking cessation, electronic cigarettes (“ecigs”) are a public benefit, rather than a public hazard, as the bill suggests.
2. Although there needs to be more research done, the current science overwhelmingly shows ecigs to be at least 99 times safer than tobacco cigarettes.
3. Current research shows that there is no evidence that ecigs pose a significant risk to the user or to bystanders.
4. As addiction experts on the front lines of fighting addiction to smoking we believe this will lesson our ability to help smokers switch to an alternative that is proving to be an effective harm reduction strategy and a win-win for smokers and society.
5. The tobacco and pharmaceutical industries will gain from the passage of this bill, and efforts to effectively help smokers quit will be diminished.
6. We support use other age verification methods that would keep minors from online purchasing of tobacco, electronic cigarettes and alcohol.

At the 4/18/2013 Board meeting CAADE reaffirmed our official position:
The California Association for Alcohol & Drug Educators (CAADE) supports efforts by the addiction treatment community to utilize its treatment expertise in developing tobacco cessation tools that include both abstinence-based and medication-assisted treatment, including the use of electronic cigarettes.

CAADE accredits addiction studies programs in over 40 colleges and universities in California, Arizona and Nevada. It also issues the highest level of addiction counselor certification in California, and currently represents more than 6000 counselors, college faculty members and students.

For more information please contact:
Fr. Jack Kearney, M.Div., CATC IV, CATE
frintervention @ gmail.com

I don't suppose this made headline news did it ? :thumbs: Take it to the next level !
 
Last edited by a moderator:

rothenbj

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2009
8,285
7,707
Green Lane, Pa
Unfortunately, this will never be the case. Look around you, the gov't regulates people which lends itself everything to include yourself. In regulating the sales of guns to vape gear ask yourself, are they regulating product or law abiding stand up citizens with no criminal history (us) from purchasing.
I, as well as many, feel we need Government. As veteran and law abiding US Citizen, I am not hell bent on bringing down the "suit curtain", just cleaning it up. The majority of the public sector is just tired of the bureaucratic mess. I support justice, unity, police protection and a Government set in place working within the laws of the Constitution.
But for ....s sake, look at the mess we have. When harden criminals walk the streets and rape and pillage at a high rate of speed and some ......... politician in Cali is concerned with e-juice or my son whom just graduated from West Point wasn't allowed to pray in high school, we have issues. We are an embarrassment to the world, financially and as once proud Nation that others looked to.
I just hope it gets cleaned up before Joe Q Public says, enough. is enough.

What I fear most for our youth is not whether may get access to e cig equipment, but that 50 years from now they'll consider these "the good old days.
 

Berylanna

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 13, 2012
2,043
3,287
south Bay Area, California
www.facebook.com
What I fear most for our youth is not whether may get access to e cig equipment, but that 50 years from now they'll consider these "the good old days.

One of the WORST things we can do is keep preaching that it does no good to contact your elected officials, they are all bought-and-paid-for, etc etc.

They are our employees. What they do is our responsibility. If we ignore their voting records in favor of their ads, WE are rewarding them for being bought and paid for (because they use the money to buy OUR attention!)

This generation needs to be taught, as those before should have been and those long-before WERE taught, that we need to keep track of what our employees are doing.
 

2coils

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 29, 2012
1,504
2,500
New Jersey
One of the WORST things we can do is keep preaching that it does no good to contact your elected officials, they are all bought-and-paid-for, etc etc.

They are our employees. What they do is our responsibility. If we ignore their voting records in favor of their ads, WE are rewarding them for being bought and paid for (because they use the money to buy OUR attention!)

This generation needs to be taught, as those before should have been and those long-before WERE taught, that we need to keep track of what our employees are doing.
Agreed! Problem is even as we vote the old "employees" out, the new ones come in. I reckon, not all of them start corrupt, though MANY of them are easily converted and leave corrupt! If you are not a fly on the wall, it is just so hard to know what is going on behind closed doors!
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
Agreed! Problem is even as we vote the old "employees" out, the new ones come in. I reckon, not all of them start corrupt, though MANY of them are easily converted and leave corrupt! If you are not a fly on the wall, it is just so hard to know what is going on behind closed doors!

True. Many a politician has entered office with lofty goals and determined to be "different," only to find out that they cannot get anything done unless they play the game. I've come to believe that the power rests not with our elected officials, but with unelected officials who keep their jobs year after year (judges, agencies, commissions, the federal reserve and the lobbyists who woo and cajole them.)

An Intelligible Principle To Restrain Unelected Government Officials - Forbes

From Administrative State to Constitutional Government
 

wv2win

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Feb 10, 2009
11,879
9,045
GA by way of WV
I can't think of how many posts I've said "Education of the general public is the key. And whether we like them or not, BLU has done more to educate thru commercials than any PV company" .. ....................

I think the new Njoy commercial about friends not letting friends smoke, is a much more effective commercial than any of the Blu commercials. It comes closes to many of our beliefs about vaping without crossing the line that Big Brother would stop:

http://adage.com/article/media/njoy-e-cig-tv-spot-insists-friends-friends-smoke/290886/
 
Last edited:

AgentAnia

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
May 22, 2013
3,739
9,455
Orbiting Sirius B
True. Many a politician has entered office with lofty goals and determined to be "different," only to find out that they cannot get anything done unless they play the game. I've come to believe that the power rests not with our elected officials, but with unelected officials who keep their jobs year after year (judges, agencies, commissions, the federal reserve and the lobbyists who woo and cajole them.)

An Intelligible Principle To Restrain Unelected Government Officials - Forbes

From Administrative State to Constitutional Government

This is SO true.... :facepalm:
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
I think the new Njoy commercial about friends not letting friends smoke, is a much more effective commercial than any of the Blu commercials. It comes closes to many of our beliefs about vaping without crossing the line that Big Brother would stop:

NJoy E-Cig TV Spot Insists 'Friends Don't Let Friends Smoke' | Media - Advertising Age

I caught a bit of that commercial the other day. I think it's great.

That article is so frustrating. E-cigarettes cannot make health claims in ads. E-cigarettes cannot make smoking cessation claims in ads. ANTZ say that e-cigarette should not be able to "glamorize" vaping in ads.

So what, exactly, is left for the e-cigarette companies to advertise about their product? Maybe if the Blu commercial had been done by a nobody actor (which was already pretty much the case, no offense to Mr. Dorff) they would have been OK with it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread