Can't see the Deeming forest for the Deeming trees?

Status
Not open for further replies.

OcalaFlGuy

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 4, 2015
1,194
2,017
Ocala, Fl
I'm sure most here have heard me agree with PB and Dimitris "theory" that the FDA Intended deeming to get mired down in lawsuits and Congress. That being the most sensical option as for one thing,that gets the FDA off the hook for actually having to Accomplish something with vaping while being able to say, Hey, we Tried.

I had yet another epiphany. <collective group eyeroll I'm sure>

Along those same lines. Maybe EVERYONE is missing the forest for the trees. What if the FDA really doesn't care At All what happens to juices and hardware in the end? What if that's not what this is even about At All?

What if the Real Objective was simply the part that says that liquid Nic is The Same as a Tobacco leaf, which it obviously is not. At least the same when it comes to TAXES.

The FDA knows they can't even keep the food we all HAVE to eat safe, how do they really think, IF they do, that they can keep all the vaping components safe. Maybe the answer is they really couldn't care less.

Maybe all they Really Want is the tax money. Seems they'll get That Wish no matter HOW The Main Part Of Deeming Everyone Is Paying Attention To pans out. Not even the Pro Vape advocates, Senators or Congressmen have said Wait A Minute, FIRST, E-juice ISN'T the same as a Cigarette... (Not in any serious numbers anyway.)

Another kicker I haven't heard yet on the Tax part of juice. If you're going to say juice is Tobacco for tax purposes than that makes a Patch a Taxable Tobacco leaf now Too doesn't it.
They AREN'T taxed now as they are an over the counter drug. Seems Big Pharm would be Very Unhappy to see the same taxes for E-juice applied to Nic patches and gum. The Pro Vape Senators and Congressmen should keep that in mind too. Maybe some Congressional memos need to go out to NRT Big Pharma to remind them of the New Taxes coming Their way...

Like they say, follow the money.
Bruce in Ocala, Fl
 

OcalaFlGuy

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 4, 2015
1,194
2,017
Ocala, Fl
I think the first Injunction needed is a few months away, for the age verification in Dec.

Unfortunately, I think the liquid Nic Isn't the same as leaf Tobacco "argument" Isn't an argument that's going to happen to any meaningful degree. That parts done IMO.

Probably not the time now to ask for the Immediate Injunction until it's clear the Agg Appropriations Bill Won't be law before the age check takes effect.
Bruce in Ocala, Fl
 
  • Like
Reactions: bnrkwest

ENAUD

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2013
9,810
64,089
Bordertown of ProVariland and REOville
A more frightening thought is that the FDA actually believes that e-liquid, batteries, software and accesories are actually tobacco products, and that they have the authority to regulate them however they "deem" appropriate.
 

OcalaFlGuy

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 4, 2015
1,194
2,017
Ocala, Fl
A more frightening thought is that the FDA actually believes that e-liquid, batteries, software and accesories are actually tobacco products, and that they have the authority to regulate them however they "deem" appropriate.
See? THAT part of Deeming is The Only Part that's already all but signed, sealed and delivered.

Have you heard ANY even Republican member of Congress stand up and say, Wait a minute, NONE of this applies to ECigs because juice isn't Tobacco? I sure haven't.

Forest for the Trees...
Bruce in Ocala, Fl
 

Max-83

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 11, 2016
116
299
61
What if the FDA really doesn't care At All what happens to juices and hardware in the end?

They don't because they won't exist in there current form after the deeming regs kick in fully.

how do they really think, IF they do, that they can keep all the vaping components safe.

All they're concerned about "keeping safe" are the closed system cigalike that pass they're PMTA process.

Maybe all they Really Want is the tax money.

Yes, they will apply the cigarette tobacco tax to the sealed cartos at whatever rate is "deem' appropriate.
 

bnrkwest

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 6, 2011
10,873
36,891
Somewhere out there
This is just a guess, but I think FDA only wants disposable ecigs on the market, sealed one time use throw away products. So BT can have their products approved and that is end of the story for vapor products. My advise is stock up now on things you like unless in the future all we can get is BT disposable, at $20.00 per ecig! Yikes!
 

daviedog

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Sep 2, 2013
3,297
3,966
Florida
W
This is just a guess, but I think FDA only wants disposable ecigs on the market, sealed one time use throw away products. So BT can have their products approved and that is end of the story for vapor products. My advise is stock up now on things you like unless in the future all we can get is BT disposable, at $20.00 per ecig! Yikes!
What goes around comes around.
Back in the day,,folks 'modified' the closed systems that were in vogue..
 
  • Like
Reactions: bnrkwest
More gibber jabber...

I cannot read minds or second guess :?: so the reality is I'll continue to spend btw $350 and $550 per month for the next year to buy supplies so as to keep the FDA out of my life. Abt two weeks ago, I got a $500 line of credit from PayPal for vape sales, and if any worthwhile sales happen I'm pushing all the chips in. That month alone I'll hit $1,000 in purchases. :w00t:

July 4th is coming up. I suspect :vapor: sales will be forthcoming. Save your pennies and dimes!

:matrix:
 

crxess

Grumpy Ole Man
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 20, 2012
24,438
46,126
71
Williamsport Md
I'm sure most here have heard me agree with PB and Dimitris "theory" that the FDA Intended deeming to get mired down in lawsuits and Congress. That being the most sensical option as for one thing,that gets the FDA off the hook for actually having to Accomplish something with vaping while being able to say, Hey, we Tried.

I had yet another epiphany. <collective group eyeroll I'm sure>

Along those same lines. Maybe EVERYONE is missing the forest for the trees. What if the FDA really doesn't care At All what happens to juices and hardware in the end? What if that's not what this is even about At All?

What if the Real Objective was simply the part that says that liquid Nic is The Same as a Tobacco leaf, which it obviously is not. At least the same when it comes to TAXES.

The FDA knows they can't even keep the food we all HAVE to eat safe, how do they really think, IF they do, that they can keep all the vaping components safe. Maybe the answer is they really couldn't care less.

Maybe all they Really Want is the tax money. Seems they'll get That Wish no matter HOW The Main Part Of Deeming Everyone Is Paying Attention To pans out. Not even the Pro Vape advocates, Senators or Congressmen have said Wait A Minute, FIRST, E-Juice ISN'T the same as a Cigarette... (Not in any serious numbers anyway.)

Another kicker I haven't heard yet on the Tax part of juice. If you're going to say juice is Tobacco for tax purposes than that makes a Patch a Taxable Tobacco leaf now Too doesn't it.
They AREN'T taxed now as they are an over the counter drug. Seems Big Pharm would be Very Unhappy to see the same taxes for E-juice applied to Nic patches and gum. The Pro Vape Senators and Congressmen should keep that in mind too. Maybe some Congressional memos need to go out to NRT Big Pharma to remind them of the New Taxes coming Their way...

Like they say, follow the money.
Bruce in Ocala, Fl

a) Big Pharma.............I have no doubt Califf has already assured them they are Safe under FDA Protection of Pharmaceuticals.
B) Tobacco Taxation in itself is unacceptable. This is a Risk Reducing Product and should Be Treated as such. No different than a Stick of Gum or Chewing on a Pencil. State Sales TAX and noting else.

No Sin Taxes on Harm Reduction!!!!
:censored: Greedy:censored::censored:
 

Two_Bears

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 4, 2015
7,045
16,673
Northern Arizona
a) Big Pharma.............I have no doubt Califf has already assured them they are Safe under FDA Protection of Pharmaceuticals.
B) Tobacco Taxation in itself is unacceptable. This is a Risk Reducing Product and should Be Treated as such. No different than a Stick of Gum or Chewing on a Pencil. State Sales TAX and noting else.

No Sin Taxes on Harm Reduction!!!!
:censored: Greedy:censored::censored:
You sure got that right.
 

rico942

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 12, 2013
1,444
3,057
Carlsbad, CA
Imagine an ideal world in which government followed a scientifically informed and benevolent course of action, utilizing tobacco tax revenue to promote vaping and subsidize innovation. In which public health followed their true mandate and used their media access to validate vaping as the ultimate development in smoking cessation. A world where corruption and self enrichment did not drive regulatory agencies, and the mass media reported proven fact rather than sensationalism and hysteria born of puritanical ideology and ignorance ...

Its not easy John, though we do try ...

images
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread