I really don't see the problem here. The world is big enough for both inventors and cloners. And each play their role.
Recently I was in the mood for Kayfun4. Original is around 200$, knockoffs from 20$ up. It's a no brainer because I live in a country where medium paycheck is less then 350$ (karma can really be a ....., I tell you). But let's assume I can afford the original.
I might easily say "This is a nice gear, reviews are great, I am going to use it for a year or two, my birthday is coming...", add to cart, checkout. Vapemail on the way - hooray! A week later I'd fill the tank and happily puff around. You get what you pay for.
Or I can be cheap (or poor) and go for a knockoff. That includes selecting several manufacturerers (some of them without the name), reading the reviews on the site and blogs, watching tons of reviews on youtube (which is another story - seriously guys, 45 mins of review with 2 mins of title and five mins of unwrapping is ridiculous), trying to connect reviews with models, weighting pros and cons, deciding who to trust... it's three evenings of work. Then make some decision which is still a gamble. And then wait for a month to get the product, wash it throughly and hope for the best. No guarantee, no support, no spare parts. You get what you pay for.
Both inventors and cloners have their markets and their role in the system and they (no matter what they say) complement each other. There wouldn't be Kayfun4 for 200$ if there was no clonned Kayfuns before. The whole scene and market would be severely limited. The whole vaping industry has this insane growth (both in money and invention sense) because there are cloners who make things affordable, expand the market and push the things forward. Not that they don't kill the profit of the original manufacturers, they actually make their business possible.