I just got home from a long day tutoring and then going to the movies with 4 of the 5 kids I tutor. As some of you already know, it was
The Jungle Book. We all decided to go to the 3-D showing, since none of us, including me, had ever seen a 3-D movie. Unlike old movies where you got cardboard glasses with one lens red and the other green, these were plastic frames, like real glasses, and the lenses were a tinted gray. I wonder how it works compared to the older 3-D. Anyone know? I'll probably not be able to resist looking it up online. I love computers, where you can get an answer to practically any question that pops into your mind!
The movie was pretty good, though the animals looked a little fake. Yes, they looked real mostly, but there was just something off about them that made me think they weren't real, whereas Mowgli was real. As expected, the plot varied from the book. I'll have the girl who has been reading the stories recall the differences and write about them. We sat down before the movie started, so we watched a lot of previews of other movies, and some of those were in 3-D, too. They even have a movie based on the video game, Angry Birds! I liked one that featured a little girl who's father didn't pay enough attention to her because he was so busy, and she wanted a cat for her birthday, so he dashed into a pet store to
buy one, and the creepy pet store owner (Christopher Walken) turned him into the cat his daughter got for her birthday. It was just weird enough to appeal to my
sense of the bizarre, even though it was a movie for kids. There was also a very strange Alice
Through the Looking Glass movie. The others were pretty lame, at least for adult tastes. I wonder what the kids thought of them. Did they get tempted by any of the trailers?
The littlest one and his sister were scared in places in
The Jungle Book, but no one was terrorized, and I think they all enjoyed it. Even their older brother, the original boy, said he liked it, that it was better than he thought it would be.
The oldest boy opted not to see it, but he almost has enough stones for a trip, and when I asked him what he'd like to do, he said he'd probably want to see a movie. I said it would have to be one I approved of, that I thought was educational.
Today, in his lesson he read about Steam, and he seemed to be enjoying it more than the usual boring stuff. He even chuckled in a few places. I asked him if he used it and if he played competitive online games, and yes to both. He didn't say anyone "owned" him, though I didn't ask. I guess he does OK, or he'd stop playing online with others. I should find out more about it. In fact, I should have asked him if there is another gaming subject he'd like to read about. Anyone (Trit?) have any ideas of a good, interesting subject?
His sister is still struggling through reading about the Mariana Trench, the deepest place in the ocean. She is really working hard to read it, but she is very, very interested in oceanography, so she wants to.
The original boy finished a book about how snowflakes form and read about Hurricane Katrina. I'm getting him to do exercises on drawing conclusions, i.e., reading between the lines, so he can figure out answers to reading comprehension questions that don't have the answer just written out for him. His reading comprehension is way behind where it should be.
His sister has finished her latest chapter on
The Jungle Book, and she opted not to read any more, if there even is another chapter -- I should check -- but I think, even if there is, it's time to move on to something more 3rd-grader-friendly.
The little one is starting to read sentences I concocted out of words I've had him learn, sentences like "The boy can do it." He's not ready for a real book yet. What amazes me is how people back in the old days used the Bible as a primer. It's tough reading for anyone, especially a beginner! How did anyone manage to learn? Also, the little boy is now doing very simple word searches all by himself, though he's still a little shaky about the ones that go on a slant.
We play concentration with a deck of alphabet cards, and he has a phenomenal memory for the positions of cards he's seen. He beats me, with my aged memory, and even his sister, who sometimes plays with us and is no dummy.
I've noticed with the kids that they all have a large capacity for memory. I wonder if that is genetically encoded somehow because Chinese is made up of lots of characters that you have to memorize, like sight words for the whole language. In fact, they have an easier time with sight words than with the concept of sounding out words. Maybe, since I'm only tutoring Chinese kids and have no other kids to compare them to, they aren't unusual, and most kids are the same, but my daughter and I were the opposite, I think. Then, maybe we're just the odd ones. Many times I wish I had more experience teaching English, so I could figure things out better, but I guess you have to start somewhere.
Interestingly enough, other things I've taught kids -- how to ride a horse, how to swim, how to tie their shoes -- don't provide much insight. I think it's because those other things are more physical and not so mental.