Woot! Tracking number from vapeNW. Both silver and black

Well Phil's review simply confirmed for me that the pair I have ordered will work perfectly for my intended use with Aspire BVC Nautilus mini's and or K1's.
I was excited to find this little device since I was looking for something small that would power the BVC line at or above 15 watts. I actually really like the Aspire carbon fiber batteries since they look like a very high quality eGo battery but I assume they have an 11w limit. 11w watts just don't quite cut it for the BVC line for me.
Can you just cancel your order and make a new order with the better price?Ew, I am really getting tired of all the price adjusting on eBay. I had no problems ordering my first iStick from vapeoutlet, so I pre-ordered from them again. Then they dropped the price so that the $31.99 I paid would include a charging cable. So I emailed them to ask if I could get the cable too since the current price includes it. I was told no, it's $3 extra! And now suddenly the price on the listing changes again, which isn't as low as it had dropped to 2 days ago, but still lower than what I paid w/o the cable.
Argh, I can see how some people don't want to deal with pre-orders, I just wasn't in a rush and wanted to save a few bucks. But obviously there's no "price protection" like on Amazon or something. I can't believe she wants to charge me $3.00 for the dumb cable when I already paid $1.29 more than they're currently selling for!!
My theory is that they had old leftover chips that were too outdated to sell anymore. IOW they're using Mean because it's cheaper to use chips that would have gone in the trash otherwise.Phil's conflict in giving the iStick an overall Thumbs Down is easily understandable. I feel the same way: I love my iStick and use it every day, but eLeaf's and JoyeTech's efforts to obfuscate the problem aggravate me enough that I won't buy another iStick unless eLeaf re-programs the chips to use Vrms in Version 2.
Just watched Phil's review. Wonder if he'd have been more satisfied if he knew to hit the arrow button again while it was auto-scrolling to accelerate it. And I noticed that delay as well. I think it is so you can hit the button quick to get the display up without firing it. The "stopwatch" doesn't start without that little pause. I wonder if there's a small program bug where it never fires after the pause, the "phanthom hit syndrome" some of us get once or twice a day.
It's hard for me to relate to the mean vs rms thing. I understand it somewhat when it refers to guitar amps. (I might be wrong with this, but peak watts vs rms watts. I ignore the claims of peak, the important value is RMS). Having said that, it doesn't mater to me in the vape. This is my first var wattage device, and first with a readout. With my Halo VV twist, I just turn it up or down. With this, I'm sorta doing the same thing. I haven't learned what wattage I like yet. With 4 new 510 tanks of various resistances and coil designs (bvc, bdc, the 30s thing).
For me, the numbers are like the volume number on my TV. I don't know what the number represents, nor do I care. And I'm not upset if the Sony is right at 11 and the Samsung is too loud at 11.
Of course, this will all change if I got a provari or other accurate device.
But for me, it's a great inexpensive step up from a VV twist into my first trip into VW digital.
I really like this thing.
The post you were responding to was referencing Alababi.com, not Alibaba.com. Totally different animal.Not saying this is Incorrect.
I just Don't consider things I read on Alibaba to be 100% Correct 100% of he Time.
And is it Relevant where an iStick is Assembled or Shipped from? Does the OEM Make the Chips/Boards that go in an iStick? Or are those Supplied to the OEM by a Sub?
That's about right - once per day for me. You might be on to something.I wonder if there's a small program bug where it never fires after the pause, the "phanthom hit syndrome" some of us get once or twice a day.
That about sums it up. Even the Vavg naysayers here might agree (myself included).I really like this thing.
Ah, Phil's video was pleasing vindication, not so much for confirmation of the iStick's use of Vavg (mis)calibration rather than Vrms---that was obvious to anyone with enough experience with PWM to know the difference---but because he was downright dumbfounded that eLeaf would choose Vavg two years after mean voltage had been discredited within the vaping community. Since then, pretty much every VV/VW APV manufacturer that uses PWM has switched to Vrms. It just doesn't pass the sniff test that eLeaf didn't know that.
I expressed pretty much the same surprised disbelief in post #1366 of this thread back on September 28th, after three days of using my iStick.
Phil's conflict in giving the iStick an overall Thumbs Down is easily understandable. I feel the same way: I love my iStick and use it every day, but eLeaf's and JoyeTech's efforts to obfuscate the problem aggravate me enough that I won't buy another iStick unless eLeaf re-programs the chips to use Vrms in Version 2.
I realize, of course, that my protest is meaningless to eLeaf, but Phil's might not be.
Ah, Phil's video was pleasing vindication, not so much for confirmation of the iStick's use of Vavg (mis)calibration rather than Vrms---that was obvious to anyone with enough experience with PWM to know the difference---but because he was downright dumbfounded that eLeaf would choose Vavg two years after mean voltage had been discredited within the vaping community. Since then, pretty much every VV/VW APV manufacturer that uses PWM has switched to Vrms. It just doesn't pass the sniff test that eLeaf didn't know that.
I expressed pretty much the same surprised disbelief in post #1366 of this thread back on September 28th, after three days of using my iStick.
Phil's conflict in giving the iStick an overall Thumbs Down is easily understandable. I feel the same way: I love my iStick and use it every day, but eLeaf's and JoyeTech's efforts to obfuscate the problem aggravate me enough that I won't buy another iStick unless eLeaf re-programs the chips to use Vrms in Version 2.
I realize, of course, that my protest is meaningless to eLeaf, but Phil's might not be.
Hi I am interested to know your thoughts on this thread and the corresponding chart.
Is it true the claim that the iStick cannot step down it's voltage?
This is an annoying problem for clearomizer users. For example, if I vape a Kanger Protank with a 1.5 ohm coil, the absolute minimum wattage I can output with a fresh battery is 12 watts. In my experience, Protanks work best at 6-12 watts, but to get that range on the iStick you would need a 3.0 ohm coil which Kanger does not produce.
Any thoughts on this? Any plans to add voltage step down in the future?
[]joyetechUSA [+1]12 points 13 days ago
We're aware of the claims that have been made--they're false. We'll be releasing a comprehensive video response to it in the coming days.
What did the cat say?!?
I think it's been mentioned on the thread at least once before. Why is Phil the first reviewer who has mentioned (if not noticed) the iStick is "firing hot"? This just proves that most vaping reviews are worth exactly what we pay for them. Perhaps a case of not wanting to bite the hand that feeds you?
I am really enjoying my iStick and look forward to v2. In time for Christmas?![]()
This is, by far, the biggest problem. The eLeaf has a serious flaw that needs to be addressed, but when confronted directly about it, they still claim that it is untrue. They did this in a thread on Reddit where Joyetech specifically asked for feedback on the device and how to make improvements with the version 2.0.
The response directly from Joyetech....