Eliquid Suppliers that can actually prove they have a chemist supervising, a video of Lab, and Independant testing

Status
Not open for further replies.

UncleChuck

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 20, 2011
1,581
1,812
38
Portland
I think your still missing our point. I completely understand the need for proper testing, but how much traversing do you need until it becomes redundant.

I was missing your point, I get it now. I guess it just depends on where you draw the line between useful caution and redundancy. As I said I don't expect all, or even the majority of juice makers to go through the effort, as it could cripple them as a business. But at the same time I know there are manufacturers out there that can do it, and I think it's a good idea.

It's not because I'm personally worried about it, as I'm well aware of, and accepting of the risk of putting anything into my body. I've been sucking down bottle after bottle of Pluid, and HHV juices. I know Pluid is made by a guy at his house, and have no idea where/how HHV crafts their juices and don't really care to find out. I love the juice, accept the risk, and vape it happily.

I'm just looking at it from an outside perspective, that one way to fight future regulation is to not give them any reason to enact it in the first place. More careful quality control could help with this.

Just because it's not a viewpoint I personally hold (that everything has to be regulated and official), doesn't mean I can't see legitimate concerns of others and discuss those issues. Boston just posted and said he worries about these issues, he isn't alone, not by a long shot. So it's a conversation worth having and I'm willing to play devils advocate, because I don't think it's fair to just tell people "don't worry about it" even if I don't happen to worry.

I think it matters from what perspective you view this from. If you view all juice makers as small scale boutique type specialty retailers, then everything I've been talking about isn't really feasible or needed. But not all juice makers fit into that niche. There are some out there that are relatively large companies, and who should be conducting themselves as such, and I think putting a little more effort into easing the minds of consumers would be in their best interest, and the best interest of all the community.

Look at Dekang as an example, very professional, legit, large company. While everyone seems paranoid about Chinese juice, just focus on the business aspect of it. It's very easy to see the difference between Dekang and small scale mixers. Because of those obvious differences I expect more out of Dekang than I would a small scale operation. I don't mean the flavor of the juice itself, just their business practices.
 
Last edited:

bigbells

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
Mar 3, 2013
2,466
56,005
60 mi east of Raleigh NC
soledoubtshow.com
As I said I don't expect all, or even the majority of juice makers to go through the effort, as it could cripple them as a business. But at the same time I know there are manufacturers out there that can do it, and I think it's a good idea.

It's not because I'm personally worried about it, as I'm well aware of, and accepting of the risk of putting anything into my body. I've been sucking down bottle after bottle of Pluid, and HHV juices. I know Pluid is made by a guy at his house, and have no idea where/how HHV crafts their juices and don't really care to find out. I love the juice, accept the risk, and vape it happily.

I'm just looking at it from an outside perspective, that one way to fight future regulation is to not give them any reason to enact it in the first place. More careful quality control could help with this.
These statements above don't fit together. You'd like some companies to voluntarily absorb the added expenses of additional testing in expectation that the other companies would then not be in danger of being burdened with mandatory requirements to do additional testing. And, your personal purchases are from the places that you don't want to see burdened by regulations.

Eventually, this would cause the big companies to raise prices, causing the smaller companies to be able to compete price-wise, causing the smaller companies to become big companies.
 
Last edited:

blackHelix

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 22, 2013
277
259
Ontario, Canada
Look at Dekang as an example, very professional, legit, large company. While everyone seems paranoid about Chinese juice, just focus on the business aspect of it. It's very easy to see the difference between Dekang and small scale mixers. Because of those obvious differences I expect more out of Dekang than I would a small scale operation. I don't mean the flavor of the juice itself, just their business practices.

I agree with this for sure. I always found it weird that some people make statements like "Oh who knows whats in that Chinese stuff"? Really? Have you ever been to china? Everyone wears paper masks and gloves when they go out. They are one of the most germophobic countries in Asia.
 

Vapoor eyes er

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Sep 13, 2011
11,028
8,945
Toronto, Ont.
I've worked at a place with an actual certified clean room. It wasn't food products being made, but it was still a certified clean room which specific policies that were supposed to be followed, and many times those policies were not followed, and in actuality the clean room was a "clean room" in name only.
I didn't personally work in the clean room as that wasn't my job, so I didn't participate in any rule bending, but I was well aware of it, as was everybody there.
So lemme get this straight…you knew of a clean room NOT following proper procedures and “looked the other way”?....yet you’re demanding vendors step up their testing, labeling and QC processes?
Ever heard of the saying “…..Glass Houses…..”?

Yes, the people who supply juice makers with their raw chemicals (nic, pg, vg, flavoring, etc) surely have plenty of skilled chemists working there. But mistake still happen. Who packaged those chemicals and sent them to you? Not a chemist. Probably a guy earning slightly over minimum wage slapping labels on barrels and moving them around with a forlift.
I am friends with a Pharmacist who owns a Pharmacy. You have no idea of the stringent controls that are in place within these companies that process and package the Food Grade/ USP PG and VG.

One more thing I wanted to mention, is the whole fear people have of China juice. I prefer to buy US made juice for two reasons, and safety is not one of those reasons. The first reason is that if something IS wrong with the juice, its quite easy to "go after"" the manufacturer that's selling the dangerous product if they are here in the US. Try going after a Chinese juice manufacturer if they poison you.
There was a case when XXXXX got a bad batch with a miniscule portion of ethylene in it from a Chinese supplier. That amount wasn't considered dangerous, but the FDA caught it (good thing) and now uses it as a propaganda tool..
You have no idea of how business is conducted in China. In the last year+ over 50 China based companies (RTO’s) have been delisted from the Nyse and Naz for falsifying revenue, holdings, etc. Because most of the BOD reside in China there’s really nothing that can be done in regards to lawsuits, court imposed penalties, etc. Some of these companies had Mkt Caps in excess of 5- 10 billion $$ and up. Try and find a legit company in China based on research…”Under Chinese law, it is illegal to remove audit work papers from China for national security reasons.” = Chinese Govt supports this policy of non disclosure. Sour grapes…no the last RTO I bought @$8 and sold at $20..last pps was 2 cents before it was delisted from ALL exchanges.
In regards to Patent Infringement and Trademarks it’s normal biz practice to ignore this section of the law in China. My sis sold Power Stations all throughout the world and she told me she dreaded whenever she had to close a deal in China. I buy U.S. manufactured juice because I know the standards here are high enuff for my liking. No China bashing- just telling it like it is and I’m sure there are many legit China based companies but based on the overall track record I choose to purchase U.S. made….am still a loyal HealthCabin customer though. The above relates to a certain standard or lack thereof in the area of ethics.
As for mixing in a Lab I run a non- profit vaping prog. Originally I mixed all juices at home under the cleanest and rigorous of conditions. When the amounts became far too overwhelming a Benefactor stepped up to the plate with a friend who owned a Lab and offered to do it for free. I observe the mixing and can tell you it’s worlds apart from my meager setup at home…impossible to replicate and I do see the definite advantage of Lab produced juice as EVERYTHING is tested. This procedure also removes a large portion of the liability assumed by myself and the Non Profit.
I'm just looking at it from an outside perspective, that one way to fight future regulation is to not give them any reason to enact it in the first place. More careful quality control could help with this.
Regardless as to how the Vendors handle this issue regulation will happen- not if but when.
 

bigbells

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
Mar 3, 2013
2,466
56,005
60 mi east of Raleigh NC
soledoubtshow.com
Do any of you know of any eliquid producers, other than Dekang, who can and will prove that they use a real chemist supervising the production of their eliquid, and will show you a video of their lab, and can prove that they use an independant lab to randomly test their eliquids?
To answer your question with no presumptions: I'm pretty sure there are no companies, including Dekang, that have a chemist supervising every opening of every container, every combining of ingredients, every bottling procedure and every labeling procedure. The exception would be if there is a one-person operation where that one person is a chemist. I'm also pretty sure that there aren't a lot of juice selling operations that employ a chemist at all. Those that do would have an additional set of eyes, and additional expertise in the field of chemistry, that the other companies lack. I do not know how large the sampling is that Dekang pays an independent lab to test, and am sure there are very few other companies if any that employ an independent testing lab. Just a personal opinion here, but when an independent lab is being paid by the company for whom it tests, the lab is not really independent.

Does Dekang cancel production if the chemist has a day off?

I'm sure they're a good company with more quality control than most if not all of the others.
 
Last edited:

PLANofMAN

Signature Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 9, 2012
4,147
8,070
45
Woodburn, OR
I think your still missing our point. I completely understand the need for proper testing, but how much traversing do you need until it becomes redundant.

Example:

I am a small business. I want to start selling mixing my own eliquid. I order my supplies from reputable manufacturers that have proper testing protocols in place. I KNOW that what i'm getting is exactly what it should be. That's like (in your example above) the convenience store owner opening all the coke bottles up, testing them, re-sealing them and then putting them back on the shelf. That doesn't happen because the store owner trusts that Coca-cola's testing procedures are in place. I think there's an argument about having chemists in place where they distill the nicotine and manufacture the PG/VG. I buy all of my PG as a pharmacy. I don't feel the need to have it tested. The same could be said about any other business.

Does the restaurant owner have a chemist come in and test all of the food for ecoli before cooking? No, he relies on the supplier to do that.

A while ago, there was a scare on the sticky sealing stuff made in envelopes. When people licked the envelope to seal it, they found out that there was some dangerous chemical on it and it was making people sick. I would expect my local stationary store to test this before selling it to me. I trust the manufacturer of the envelopes to make sure it's safe. It's a risk I guess we all take all the time.

While I see your point and understand that safety is definitely of the up-most important, I think your putting eliquid "mixers" at higher standard than you would any other small business.

I think everyone's fears are somewhat warranted, but just in the wrong place. It doesn't take a chemist to mix eliquid. It does however take a really good understanding to extract nicotine from tobacco leaves, manufacturer PG/VG, distill flavor extracts, etc. To the extent that a chemist and a proper lab is almost mandatory. There are companies that already have a reputable process for doing all of this. If you're concerned with a vendor's premixed liquid, I would just ask them where they get their supplies from. Chances are they will provide this to you. Then you can do the research on these suppliers to verify proper quality control. Asking the small vendors to do proper chemical "testing" is kind of overkill IMHO.

Finally, two people who get it! They understand me, they really understand me!:toast:

So lemme get this straight…you knew of a clean room NOT following proper procedures and “looked the other way”?....yet you’re demanding vendors step up their testing, labeling and QC processes?
Ever heard of the saying “…..Glass Houses…..”?


I am friends with a Pharmacist who owns a Pharmacy. You have no idea of the stringent controls that are in place within these companies that process and package the Food Grade/ USP PG and VG.


There was a case when XXXXX got a bad batch with a miniscule portion of ethylene in it from a Chinese supplier. That amount wasn't considered dangerous, but the FDA caught it (good thing) and now uses it as a propaganda tool..
You have no idea of how business is conducted in China. In the last year+ over 50 China based companies (RTO’s) have been delisted from the Nyse and Naz for falsifying revenue, holdings, etc. Because most of the BOD reside in China there’s really nothing that can be done in regards to lawsuits, court imposed penalties, etc. Some of these companies had Mkt Caps in excess of 5- 10 billion $$ and up. Try and find a legit company in China based on research…”Under Chinese law, it is illegal to remove audit work papers from China for national security reasons.” = Chinese Govt supports this policy of non disclosure. Sour grapes…no the last RTO I bought @$8 and sold at $20..last pps was 2 cents before it was delisted from ALL exchanges.
In regards to Patent Infringement and Trademarks it’s normal biz practice to ignore this section of the law in China. My sis sold Power Stations all throughout the world and she told me she dreaded whenever she had to close a deal in China. I buy U.S. manufactured juice because I know the standards here are high enuff for my liking. No China bashing- just telling it like it is and I’m sure there are many legit China based companies but based on the overall track record I choose to purchase U.S. made….am still a loyal HealthCabin customer though. The above relates to a certain standard or lack thereof in the area of ethics.
As for mixing in a Lab I run a non- profit vaping prog. Originally I mixed all juices at home under the cleanest and rigorous of conditions. When the amounts became far too overwhelming a Benefactor stepped up to the plate with a friend who owned a Lab and offered to do it for free. I observe the mixing and can tell you it’s worlds apart from my meager setup at home…impossible to replicate and I do see the definite advantage of Lab produced juice as EVERYTHING is tested. This procedure also removes a large portion of the liability assumed by myself and the Non Profit.

Regardless as to how the Vendors handle this issue regulation will happen- not if but when.
I can see the benefits of Lab production over "home brewed" juices. If nothing else, they have the tools to be very precise in their measurements. It wouldn't surprise me at all if they could make a 10 gallon batch using pre-measured components, and have a tolerance of + or - 5ml. I imagine that when you made small batches, (to use a very basic idea) the nicotine concentration might have been slightly off from batch to batch. Say, you were going for 10mg. One batch might have 9.75mg and the next 10.25mg.
Does the lack of a super tight tolerance bother me, not really.

For those of you who have been vaping Pluid, you all know that the basic strength is 20mg. Right?
Wrong. Murdock has said more than once, right from the beginning, that the true nicotine content of 20mg. Pluid is 20.8mg. Should we crucify Murdock for telling us each and every bottle of 20mg. Pluid is mislabeled? As others have stated before, Murdock is a one man operation. He has a full time job working in a military hospital. He was recently notified that his job is being cut and he will be receiving discharge papers this summer. Luckily for him he has a thriving business with 4 flavors to sell. He cannot keep up with demand at this point, but hopefully by next Christmas, supply will outstrip demand.

Talking about Pluid always makes my mind wander...
Back on track. If someone told all you people that cigarettes were being tested in labs and manufactured in cleanrooms under rigorously controlled conditions to ensure absolute purity from batch to batch, would that make you feel better? Safer? Because they basically are!

There's a reason Camels taste like Camels and Marlboro's taste like Marlboro's. It's because highly paid chemists and plant specialists blend each batch from specially selected tobaccos. If you guys can't draw your own conclusions from that, I don't know what else to say.
 

Vapoor eyes er

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Sep 13, 2011
11,028
8,945
Toronto, Ont.
Finally, two people who get it! They understand me, they really understand me!:toast:
I can see the benefits of Lab production over "home brewed" juices. If nothing else, they have the tools to be very precise in their measurements. It wouldn't surprise me at all if they could make a 10 gallon batch using pre-measured components, and have a tolerance of + or - 5ml. I imagine that when you made small batches, (to use a very basic idea) the nicotine concentration might have been slightly off from batch to batch. Say, you were going for 10mg. One batch might have 9.75mg and the next 10.25mg.
Does the lack of a super tight tolerance bother me, not really.


For those of you who have been vaping Pluid, you all know that the basic strength is 20mg. Right?
Wrong. Murdock has said more than once, right from the beginning, that the true nicotine content of 20mg. Pluid is 20.8mg. Should we crucify Murdock for telling us each and every bottle of 20mg. Pluid is mislabeled? As others have stated before, Murdock is a one man operation. He has a full time job working in a military hospital. He was recently notified that his job is being cut and he will be receiving discharge papers this summer. Luckily for him he has a thriving business with 4 flavors to sell. He cannot keep up with demand at this point, but hopefully by next Christmas, supply will outstrip demand.

Talking about Pluid always makes my mind wander...
Back on track. If someone told all you people that cigarettes were being tested in labs and manufactured in cleanrooms under rigorously controlled conditions to ensure absolute purity from batch to batch, would that make you feel better? Safer? Because they basically are!

The Lab actually measures by weight taking into consideration other variables. Really quite interesting....the first time :D
 

UncleChuck

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 20, 2011
1,581
1,812
38
Portland
So lemme get this straight…you knew of a clean room NOT following proper procedures and “looked the other way”?....yet you’re demanding vendors step up their testing, labeling and QC processes?
Ever heard of the saying “…..Glass Houses…..”?


I am friends with a Pharmacist who owns a Pharmacy. You have no idea of the stringent controls that are in place within these companies that process and package the Food Grade/ USP PG and VG.


There was a case when XXXXX got a bad batch with a miniscule portion of ethylene in it from a Chinese supplier. That amount wasn't considered dangerous, but the FDA caught it (good thing) and now uses it as a propaganda tool..
You have no idea of how business is conducted in China. In the last year+ over 50 China based companies (RTO’s) have been delisted from the Nyse and Naz for falsifying revenue, holdings, etc. Because most of the BOD reside in China there’s really nothing that can be done in regards to lawsuits, court imposed penalties, etc. Some of these companies had Mkt Caps in excess of 5- 10 billion $$ and up. Try and find a legit company in China based on research…”Under Chinese law, it is illegal to remove audit work papers from China for national security reasons.” = Chinese Govt supports this policy of non disclosure. Sour grapes…no the last RTO I bought @$8 and sold at $20..last pps was 2 cents before it was delisted from ALL exchanges.
In regards to Patent Infringement and Trademarks it’s normal biz practice to ignore this section of the law in China. My sis sold Power Stations all throughout the world and she told me she dreaded whenever she had to close a deal in China. I buy U.S. manufactured juice because I know the standards here are high enuff for my liking. No China bashing- just telling it like it is and I’m sure there are many legit China based companies but based on the overall track record I choose to purchase U.S. made….am still a loyal HealthCabin customer though. The above relates to a certain standard or lack thereof in the area of ethics.
As for mixing in a Lab I run a non- profit vaping prog. Originally I mixed all juices at home under the cleanest and rigorous of conditions. When the amounts became far too overwhelming a Benefactor stepped up to the plate with a friend who owned a Lab and offered to do it for free. I observe the mixing and can tell you it’s worlds apart from my meager setup at home…impossible to replicate and I do see the definite advantage of Lab produced juice as EVERYTHING is tested. This procedure also removes a large portion of the liability assumed by myself and the Non Profit.

Regardless as to how the Vendors handle this issue regulation will happen- not if but when.

Very familiar with the glass house saying! I'm a hypocrite! I'm not demanding anything, I'm not saying I want governmental regulation. I'm saying that some people have concerns about juice facilities, and I think they are legitimate concerns. I'm just suggesting possible routes that some companies could take on their own to ease those fears. If this wasn't an issue at all, there would be no push for the juice standards organization. Some people care, I don't personally, but I do care for my fellow vapers and the future of vaping as a whole.

As far as the naughty cleanroom: I was a Temp worker there, I had zero authority. As I said, everyone was aware of the issue. It wasn't lazy employees, it was shady management. These weren't food products, the clean room was there to avoid damage to small and sensitive components from dust and debris. I'll just come out and say it, they were producing Stainless Steel cylinders and bubblers for Dow Chemical. The type of thing used for storing, transporting, and mixing their various chemicals.

The valves on these pieces could be easily damaged if any dust or debris got into them, and the inside of the tanks had to be spotless, hence they had to be in the clean room until they were completely sealed. Except they weren't, and again this was management's orders, not just lazy employees. Some stuff we made for Intel was supposed to be completely assembled, and then double bagged with cleanroom grade plastic bags, all within the clean room as to avoid dirt or debris getting into the parts. They had a folding picnic table set up outside the clean room which the parts were assembled and bagged on. When I asked why the work order was not being followed, and the parts were outside the cleanroom, I was told it was too much of a hassle to send them through the cleanroom and to stop asking questions.

They were a shady company. Not only because of their lack of concern for following proper procedure, but the way they treated employees. What do you suppose I should have done? If I went to the customers and told them, I'd be sued for violating my nondisclosure agreement. It was pointless to tell management, or the owner, as it was THEM making the choice to do this.

After awhile of me taking issue with their policy, I was laid off. Then I was brought back a few months later at the request of a few people there who were sick of my replacement screwing up. A bit later on a customer had a faulty product sent to them, and I was laid off again because of it, even though the faulty part was a result of the company's violation of procedure, nothing to do with me. Not sure how I could have damaged a part I never touched or even laid eyes on.

I also worked for an electronics recycling company that would send tons and tons of primary and rechargeable lithium ion, lead acid, all sorts of batteries straight through a huge industrial shredder. No caution was taken, just toss them in by the pallet load. Batteries caught on fire in the shredder, the entire place smelled of burning chemicals, and we were told it was safe. They also had a mercury spill they had employees cleaning up with paper towels and no gloves.

This was another place I was sent to work for while with a temp agency. I walked out, told the temp agency about the dangerous working environment at the plant, and was then fired by the temp agency for walking out on a job, evidently they would have preferred I stay inside a building full of burning lithium ion, lead acid, etc batteries.

Does that paint a clearer pictures of the issue? Or am I still a bad guy because I'm (possibly) violating the NDA by explaining the situation to you? ;)

I'm not even one of the people that cares strongly about having juice made in a cleanroom, or having chemists on property, or anything like that. I'm personally very comfortable with how things currently work. I'm bringing up these issues because there are many people who DO care, and care quite strongly about such things. I think they have a valid point, even if it's not one I agree with personally, that's all.

I agree that buying US juice is good practice for the simple fact you actually have a course of action if you get poisoned, unlike in China. I mentioned this exact issue a few posts back.

The only reason I used Dekang as an example is because I didn't want to be seen as "calling out" any US based juice manufactures. And I wasn't very clear on what I meant by business practice. What I meant was that Dekang is relatively large, and they at least try to present the image of being a professional company that takes their job seriously. Releasing promo footage of a nice factory with stainless steel tanks and conicals all over, even if it's complete BS, at least shows they are trying to appear "legit"

Being proud of one's facilities and employees enough to show them off for the world to see is good thing, and reflects positively on the company and vaping in general. Just like what started this entire thread, the OP wanted to know what juice makers gave information, showed images/vid/etc of their facilities. If a company is making juice in a relatively clean area with obvious safety precautions they should be thrilled with the idea of showing this to everyone. If they keep their juice mixing lab a secret some people might wonder why.
 

UncleChuck

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 20, 2011
1,581
1,812
38
Portland
Talking about Pluid always makes my mind wander...

I can't blame you for that.... I think it happens to all of us ;) It's truly magical stuff.

I believe I understand your point of view well, after a little back and fourth took place. The thing that threw me off was the "it's tested at the supplier's lab so we don't need to test it again" thing. Someone like Murdock? No, I would never expect him to test all his incoming product. Pretty much everything I said was only about large scale juice manufacturers, who would have the means to at least test new batches.

If you are buying PG and VG by the 55gal drum, I think you are big enough that testing a new batch of raw materials when it comes in would be warranted. If for no other reason, if there is something wrong with that particular batch, that's a big financial loss the juice manufacturer would have to eat.

Really I don't think we are disagreeing on much. My personal feelings match yours, but not everybody feels the same way and I'm trying to address the concerns of other people.

As far as the cigarette thing, it is odd nobody seemed to care too much about what went into them, but people are picky about what goes into their juice. The only thing I could say is that we know cigarettes are dangerous, and will kill you in 30-40 years. But if a cigarette company made a mistake and put something in a cigarette that would literally kill you right after smoking the cigarette, that's a huge deal. And I'm sure BT has plenty of quality control measures in place to make sure that doesn't happen, we can't buy their cigarettes if we die TOO fast.
 

UncleChuck

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 20, 2011
1,581
1,812
38
Portland
Well everyone on this forum cared a little bit, since most of us have quit smoking lol.

Good call heh. Maybe that's why everyone is so paranoid about juice? They feel like they inherited a second life by switching to vaping, and don't want to screw that one up with poisoned juice.
 

PLANofMAN

Signature Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 9, 2012
4,147
8,070
45
Woodburn, OR
I found this earlier today when I was looking for something completely unrelated, so I figured I would post it up here for the OP to look at.

How does Johnson Creek control the nicotine percentages?

All of our production is controlled by cGMP standards. Johnson Creek’s Executive Vice President of Product Development carefully calculates every batch and then their Senior R&D Chemist verifies those calculations before sending the mix sheets to the lab for production. Once in the lab, their Lab Manager measures out and records all ingredients. Each of those measurements is then verified and signed by a second Lab Technician. The batches are then periodically tested with a GC-FID or GC-MS machine to verify accurate nicotine levels. Our test results show our nicotine levels are consistently within a 99.3% to 100.7% range.

Besides mix sheets and COAs, how does Johnson Creek ensure quality?

Johnson Creek follows cGMPs (current Good Manufacturing Practices), and SOPs (Standard Operating Practices). They also utilize a HACCP (Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point) program that includes full traceability and a recall program. They have both a Quality Manual and an Operations Manual that details the procedures.

And here's a link to a video.
Click here to take a video tour through Johnson Creek in Wisconsin.

So there you go, a vendor that other vendors can look up to and admire. :)
 
Last edited:

PLANofMAN

Signature Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 9, 2012
4,147
8,070
45
Woodburn, OR
I was gonna come and make a chemistry joke about sodium in this thread but then I thought, Na. Maybe I'll make a joke about potassium instead, K?
I was going to make one about gold in reply, but then I realized that since I don't know your name, I'd feel bad saying "Au."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread