You are wrong! Moreover, you are adding to the growing antipathy that the general non smoking population feels towards vapers with your arrogance.
Even if you were not vaping something obnoxious like bacon and eggs or essence of buffalo dung, you are still putting odors in the air of a restaurant. Restaurants have enough trouble contending with the normal stuff like perfume and body odor. ecig vapor does have a nasty habit of sticking to stuff; I have to clean the inside of my windshield a lot more often when vaping and driving.
The lack of patrons at that time does not give you the right to be disrespectful to the people working there.
(Emphasis mine.)
The OP wasn't just wrong; he was dead wrong. Short of refusing you service because of your gender or race, restaurant owners can do just about anything they want on their own property, reasonable or not. On the day that private businesses are disallowed from making their own policies regarding non-essential behavior, vaping will be the least of our concerns.
That said, let us not use the OP's rather exceptional ignorance on the matter of private-property rights to prop up an argument that vaping in restaurants is disrespectful per se. Perhaps I misinterpret you, but your post reads as though you are conflating the disrespectful argument the OP made vis-a-vis business owners' rights with the disrespect you believe to be tied to vaping in public places.
It's one thing to say that restaurants have an unassailable right to make anti-vaping policies; it's quite another to say that they're correct to enact those policies. The latter statement does not proceed from the former, just as a defense of free speech does not require agreement with any particular speaker. More power to you if you happen to agree with the restaurant's policy, but that's a hotly contested opinion that has nothing to do with the OP's situation.
As I am not particularly interested in having the vaping-in-public-places debate for the bajillionth time this month, I will reserve further comment. Suffice to say that although the OP's wrongness is beyond dispute, everything else remains very much in dispute.
Last edited: