- 1000 µg/25=40 µg per puff not 500
- 0.5 µg/puff at 25W vs 40 µg per puff at 480F cant be compared.
- You cant compare a study based on watts with a study based on temp, it is apples and oranges. I.e. that 0.5 µg/puff at 25W might have have been at 450F for all we know.
Correct. My bad. 40 µg not 500. Thank you. Still significantly higher than that seen in Kistler's work. And still, wattage and temperature do correlate. Here is a real world graph.
So, for a 450F temperature, my TC board put our 75W for 1 second (my preference to get to 450F fast) then maintained that temp at 30W for a period of time to keep it at 450F, then lowered the power the longer I held the fire button for to keep it from exceeding my set temperature. Without TC, the 30W would continue to be applied as long as I held the fire button, exceeding the 450F target, namely when your vape gets too hot at the end of a draw (the nice thing about TC).
Unfortunately, I can't capture temperature in Device Monitor when in power/watt mode. But I think it is reasonable to assume a continually rising temperature line as opposed to the curve above. Regardless, I was able to achieve a temperature of ~450F with 30W. That's not out of left field when looking at Kistler's results. It is difficult to imagine a Subtank coil of 0.5 ohm being dramatically different than my home brewed 0.5 ohm coil (the purple line above). Now if Kistler had tested the 1.5 ohm subtank coil instead and ran that at 26W without a lot of nasty stuff being produced, I'd be even more impressed.
We all agree here. High temp bad. Lower temp safer. Is TC required to assure you never reach unsafe temperatures? Unknown because TC was never actually tested. TC may certainly be a useful tool to prevent exceeding specific temperatures, but that does not automatically discount simply correlating temperatures to what can be achieved at a given power/wattage setting.