Are these still for sale at Smoktech? I can't find them.
Unfortunately batteries are not a one size fits all thing.
I just recently won a beautiful wood bottom feeder. In theory you can run it stacked at 6V, else use a single 18650. A no brainer for me, since I'm happy at 8 - 9W, so I use 18650 with a 1.5 ohm atty.
Then, chemistry. Protected ICR or IMR? Even fresh off the charger, 4.2V, the battery is only going to be called on to provide 4.2/1.5 = 2.8 amps. Since the PV has zero electronics protection, and sometimes atties do go short circuit, I went for protected ICR; I've got one each of 2600 and 3100 mAh, highest draw is only around 1C.
IMR can have a bad day, too. Please see: http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...ures-serious-battery-failure-imr-18650-a.html
So, for a boost VV I'd absolutely use IMR, but for an unregulated single battery PV my own choice is high capacity protected ICR, relying on the battery to cover the short circuit protection. My choice isn't necessarily right for anyone else, just that it was a conscious thought process.
Why can't I find it on the site?
Got a quick question re Battery,s I have the AW IMR 18350s in the Vmax right now ................
I have some Blue coloured 18350 IMR Batts & some Grey ICR ? 18350s are these "safe" to use in the Vmax ????
better to be safe than sorry !!!!
Are these still for sale at Smoktech? I can't find them.
Are these still for sale at Smoktech? I can't find them.
As posted in the thread by oldsoldier: "A failure is a failure. The battery vented with flame (aka exploded). Whether it was user error, a shorted mod or the moons aligned just wrong the battery did fail and vent with flame. "
And from Rolygate, "...A large rechargeable cell is like a small grenade. If you want to ignore that fact, it is up to you.
AW IMR cells are the least likely of all the various types to explode in the user's face, which is why we recommend them. But like any other type, they will burn up in some circumstances..."
I don't disagree that AW IMR are good. Use is situational, however. Even IMR can do things that would be really bad, an educated user is the ultimate protection. I explained it in my prior post, selection of the battery based on intended use and knowing the rest of the system (in my case a PV that had no electronic protection lead me to selecting protected ICR, to avoid the potential for a short.)
... with less safe chemistries (ICR, LiFePO4, etc.)

One of us needs to go back to Batt U to check this but I don't think this is even right...
Last time I checked LiFePO4 was the safest of the lot... better than IMR even.
I looked it up and it seems Batt U puts IMR and LiFEPO4 in same "most safe" catagory:Yes, I believe you are correct and that I confused LiPO with LiFePO4. I hope this does not negate all of my points.
The driver for Li-ion safety is decomposition temperature that releases oxygen. All of the Li-ion chemistries have plenty of energy density to be dangerous if they light off. The vapors aren't exactly healthful either. For LiFePO4, that temp is over 600C. LiMn2O4 is stable up to about 180C. LiCoO2 has shown thermal runaway at about 155C. However, LiCoO2 safety can be a tricky thing to quantify. It can start to react with its electrolyte at even 130C.
The Li-ion safety issue can be characterized as the cathode material "burning" the electrolyte. For LiCoO2, the cobalt is in a very unstable oxidation state and readily liberates oxygen, and then reacting with the organic electrolyte. Based on this, some researchers have proposed using oxygen chemical potential as a metric for cathode safety. LiCoO2 oxygen chemical potential is about +0.5eV and is thus "unsafe". LiMn2O4 is about -0.3eV and is "safer". LiFePO4 is about -1.6eV and is "safe".
Sometimes I just shake my head. I've been a EE for 30 years, sometimes people just don't want to hear things, are sure they know better after a couple months![]()
Yes, I believe you are correct and that I confused LiPO with LiFePO4. I hope this does not negate all of my points.