I'll check. Thanks turbo![]()
Would love to hear the resistance readings of those leads Supe. It'll put the VD results of your OliveR and Reo into better context.
I'll check. Thanks turbo![]()
I have unscrewed attys and placed them on that cartotometer and the results were pretty close to the readings with the RM2 and copper leads but now I'm anxious to check too![]()

. . . . . . I think he's psychic or something. 
. . . . . . little segue back to this morning's conversation. (been doing the final ship-sies .. . all done . . . everybody's coming . . .) . . . . . . ←
I totally agree with what most of y'all were saying re: I neither need, want, nor would know what to do with a reviewer (Supe being the exception to the rule). I'd sooner go out of my way to avoid reviews at this point than to facilitate them. There's just no room for that kin'a stuff in this wee little thang we got goin' on here. That said, there is this one guy, who just so happens to be a reviewer. He and I have been chit-chatting, over the months. I joined his forum back before I ever launched this thread. He said nice things about my mods on his fackbook page. Anyway, he also happens to be a person (not just a reviewer), a person whom I like and appreciate, and he had asked to be put on the list to buy a mod sometime back. He didn't know when; but he did know he was eventually gonna get one. So, I told him we'd figure something out (list/order-wise) when he was ready to "knock the McCraggedon" (. . . . . or whatever they do . . . . .): i.e. I gave him a floating spot on the list months ago. To be filled NOT by bumping someone else; but when it works out, with a drop-out or something.
btw: he does seem to have a propensity to drop by whenever people talk about him. . . . ... . . . . . I think he's psychic or something.
(either that, or he understands how 'mputers work)![]()
. He needs a dibi anyway and should buy oneEven though no sig required, once again I get that ridiculous no authorized recipient denial. Guess tomorrow is the day...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
. . . . . . little segue back to this morning's conversation. (been doing the final ship-sies .. . all done . . . everybody's coming . . .) . . . . . . ←
I totally agree with what most of y'all were saying re: I neither need, want, nor would know what to do with a reviewer (Supe being the exception to the rule). I'd sooner go out of my way to avoid reviews at this point than to facilitate them. There's just no room for that kin'a stuff in this wee little thang we got goin' on here. That said, there is this one guy, who just so happens to be a reviewer. He and I have been chit-chatting, over the months. I joined his forum back before I ever launched this thread. He said nice things about my mods on his fackbook page. Anyway, he also happens to be a person (not just a reviewer), a person whom I like and appreciate, and he had asked to be put on the list to buy a mod sometime back. He didn't know when; but he did know he was eventually gonna get one. So, I told him we'd figure something out (list/order-wise) when he was ready to "knocker the McCraggedon" (or whatever it is they do): i.e. I gave him a floating spot on the list months ago. To be filled NOT by bumping someone else; but when it works out, with a drop-out or something.
btw: he does seem to have a propensity to drop by whenever people talk about him. . . . ... . . . . . I think he's psychic or something.
(either that, or he understands how 'mputers work)![]()
Todd probably checks for his name every day. He needs a dibi anyway and should buy one
.
I'm going to start stalking the mailman now... even tho it's raining in Florida right now and we might be next to get washed away.
oh . . . .. well, take advantage of the opportunity . . . put all your vaselined stuff out on the sidewalk for a shower .. . .![]()
![]()
. . . . .. .. .. . .
. . . . . . .![]()
Even though no sig required, once again I get that ridiculous no authorized recipient denial. Guess tomorrow is the day...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Next run: big box 'o hamster bedding. Retail value: 12 cents.So, I've sent out 3 runs now, and the USPS label printing continues to stupify me. I'm guessing (because it really does seem erratic, and I really am paying attention when I do it), that if a person wants to guarantee a "carrier leave", they need to ask me to put in a false value on the site (like, under $50). What this would mean, i imagine, is if the package was damaged or lost, insurance or no, the person would have absolutely no recourse with the P.O. Man. . . . . .. (or Woman). I'm not willing to downplay the value of the contents of someone else's package, and waive any rights to compensation that they may have unless I am specifically and clearly asked to do so.
bear in mind . . . .
thunder punch? in the richard? . . .. . .
wow, poetic.