How did we go from talking about Phillip Morris ( PM ) to British Telecom ( BT ) ??
To be repeating the obvious- one does not Need " a gun to one's head" to feed a severe addiction, though by manipulating the addiction BT did "close enough" to exactly that. Not being content with how addictive they already were, they made sure to increase the addictive properties as much as possible. It was not some "accident" it was well planned (and even well documented in their own records) .
Just wanted to chime in to say I share your passion on the issues Jim Bob. Reading though some of the past posts I find it ironic. The majority of us here on ECF were so strung out on cigarettes, so addicted and taken from our "choice" we supposedly could just stop, we discovered PVs to set us free.
I'm not saying I don't agree with many about personal responsibility. Absolutely. People should take that for their own lives and choices. Yes I take responsibility for my 11 year old self's ignorant choice of that first cigarette. However the addiction that followed wasn't exactly choice. All I know is everyone is going think what they want to think and more power to you. I really don't want to become a "high n mighty" sort of ex-smoker. The kind that forgot the struggles I faced and tell other smokers "Oooh well you made the choice to buy it, just stop" If it was that easy no one would smoke and I would of quit cold turkey.
It would also be great if folks would actually read before offering a nonsense rebuttal ..
When PM or any other other maker holds a gas mask on your face and forces cig smoke down your throat, when Mickey D's force feeds a Big Mac down your gullet, or, use any other example you can think of .. then come back and whine about how you were forced to become an addict .. otherwise, excercise the basic human concept of "free will" ..
Those that complain that they were somehow roped into doing something allowed that to happen .. they excercised "free will" .. however, now, it's the big bad establishments fault .. THEY made me do it, somehow ..
I'm an addict and I admit it .. no one forced me to do anything .. I smoked because it was cool .. and I kept doing it for over 40 years, knowing full well I should not .. now, I'm still sucking on a nicotine delivery device .. and I'm still an addict ..
I'm still just as addicted as I was before without all those "addictive" chemicals.
To be repeating the obvious- one does not Need " a gun to one's head" to feed a severe addiction, though by manipulating the addiction BT did "close enough" to exactly that. Not being content with how addictive they already were, they made sure to increase the addictive properties as much as possible. It was not some "accident" it was well planned (and even well documented in their own records) . My health was good (as far as I know) it was discovery of what lengths they'd gone to without my knowledge (or permission) why I made the difficult choice to stop supporting such a business, it was HARD but a wise decision. When we know that > 90% of those who try to quit won't make it no matter how much they try to quit, well that IS bad any way you slice things IMO.
As for what it "turned into" I don't see how we could discuss the possibility of BT getting into this business without bringing out what they Have already done with their current products and WHY we don't want that in PV supplies/niquids (and it's not assumptions or speculation it is very well known)
I will be surprised if BP doesn't at some point get into "paying for some studies " which will "prove" that PV are less effective than the patch to suit their own goals. ONCE you know what folks have done you can easily see what they MAY do.... IMO
Yeah not a conspiracy theory. I had a guy come in to buy an ecig for his father one day when I used to work at an ecig retail shop. He asked how quickly his father could step down the nicotine and I mentioned that he should probably stay at a higher level at first until he's detoxed from the other additives in tobacco.
When I started to mention that tobacco has other things in it that are addictive, he said "Oh, I know! I work at PM and we put all kinds of things in there...sugar, cocoa, etc"
To be repeating the obvious- one does not Need " a gun to one's head" to feed a severe addiction, though by manipulating the addiction BT did "close enough" to exactly that. Not being content with how addictive they already were, they made sure to increase the addictive properties as much as possible. It was not some "accident" it was well planned (and even well documented in their own records) . My health was good (as far as I know) it was discovery of what lengths they'd gone to without my knowledge (or permission) why I made the difficult choice to stop supporting such a business, it was HARD but a wise decision. When we know that > 90% of those who try to quit won't make it no matter how much they try to quit, well that IS bad any way you slice things IMO.
As for what it "turned into" I don't see how we could discuss the possibility of BT getting into this business without bringing out what they Have already done with their current products and WHY we don't want that in PV supplies/niquids (and it's not assumptions or speculation it is very well known)
I will be surprised if BP doesn't at some point get into "paying for some studies " which will "prove" that PV are less effective than the patch to suit their own goals. ONCE you know what folks have done you can easily see what they MAY do.... IMO
<---- Richmond, VA lol I pass by the big smokestack frequently.
the company that makes the goods are within their legal right to do so ..
nor did it buy me the right to peer into the business practices of any company that may have gone out to make me an addict .
Ha, we are neighbors! LOL I didn't even see the richmond location under your avvy when I replied. Mine says DC but I have since moved.