Random DIY mixing and More

FranC

Long time vaper.
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
  • Oct 1, 2010
    195,594
    646,086
    New Hampshire
    :w00t: I made a tester recipe (completely bypassing the single flavor test) and OMG! It's 10 days old and I decided to give it a shot because it did say to age 1 week.

    Wow! It's really really good! I know you're going to laugh at this but it tastes just like smoking an American cigarette. Canadian cigarettes taste different (which you may or may not know). I really like this - it's scratching an itch for me.

    I only bought one NET Stixx Mixx - the A+ Blend. I may need to buy a few more now. ;)
    Back in my late childhood I did have a few Canadian cigs.. My Aunt had a camp on Lake Champlain,NY. Lots of across the border travel back then. Good to hear on the Stixx. I want the Whiskey one.
     

    ceeceeisme

    Ultra Member
    ECF Veteran
    Aug 30, 2016
    2,204
    9,095
    62
    Niagara Region, ON CANADA
    Back in my late childhood I did have a few Canadian cigs.. My Aunt had a camp on Lake Champlain,NY. Lots of across the birder travel back then. Good to hear on the Stixx. I want the Whiskey one.

    Would that be the Whiskey Cavendish?
     

    JCinFLA

    Vaping Master
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Oct 21, 2015
    9,397
    44,584
    I think you're right. NR, or whoever they get their 120 ml bottles from labelled TFA as Fa.

    That doesn't make it right. It doesn't even make sense. Like someone else here said, if you insist on making it into only 2 letters instead of 3, PA would make more sense.

    But, I like TFA instead. It just makes more sense and has always been that way. Fa and FA just confuses the issue. There's no need to force extra confusion unnecessarily.

    Linda said they started using the Fa logo approx. 3 years ago, but only on the 4oz. and 16oz. size bottles of flavorings that do not require special GHS labelling. GHS labelling became a requirement for flavorings that might cause skin sensitivity, or are flammable, or several other reasons. It was because of some new government regs. that they had to start using different labels for those that did require it, and those that don't. Those that do need GHS labelling...have a bunch of extra wording about those things above, written on them.

    So, if vendors like NR, ECX, etc. buy and rebottle her company's flavorings...it comes with the proper label on it when they get it from her company. She has no control over how they label it though, when they rebottle it.

    The 4mL and 15mL bottles bought from her website...all have the Flavor Apprentice logo.

    I am not bothered by changing to Fa as that is now the brand name. This is the name the vendors have started using and I personally think the forums should use it for new mixers so they don't get confused as to what they mean to order.

    According to Linda...Fa is not now their brand name. It's just used as their logo on some of their labels (per the above post). Their brand name is still The Flavor Apprentice and/or The Perfumer's Apprentice.

    The only vendor I have seen using the 'Fa' for TFA is NR. Apparently they are re-labeling TFA bottles that they sell. To me that is just plain wrong and a bit shady in my book. Its just like ecigexpress labeling TFA their 'Signature' line. That caused so much confusion that they now put TFA in the description exposing the real source.

    See my post above about the Fa and NR.

    Linda wasn't aware of the "Signature" line being sold by ECX until I told her about it. However, she said that any vendor can buy TFA flavorings, rebottle them, and call them whatever they want to call them. She has no control over that. But, she went on to say that the only way a consumer can find out if the rebottled "Signature" flavorings are indeed the same original TFA flavorings, or not...would be to buy a small bottle from both places and compare them.

    "Vendors can unfortunately pretty much label flavors as they choose"

    I didn't know that vendors had that kind of power/control over another companies product. Somehow that just doesn't seem right to me.

    Answered in above post.
    She did agree with my own guess as to why ECX for example, might call their TFA flavorings "Signature" or something else. I told her I thought it was because it would give customers the false idea...that the only place to get a favorite "Signature" flavoring, was from ECX, as if it was their own proprietary flavoring! If they didn't make it known that it was a TFA flavoring carried by many vendors = more repeat customers for them.

    A guess as to why ECX is now putting TFA in the description: They were losing customers who wanted to buy TFA flavorings...and they were going elsewhere to buy them, since ECX didn't carry them! That sort of forced their hand to make it be known that their "Signature" line is TFA.

    I don't claim to be an authority on the matter but from the information that I have seen to date, it was indeed the company ( The Perfume/Flavor Apprentice ) itself that introduced the new logo 'Fa' and not specific vendors.

    Bingo! We have a winner!

    NR and OSDIYS are the two that pop into mind without looking. Fa or FA is on the invoices as well.

    I've only ordered a couple times from NR, but on their invoices I just pulled out of my file...for the TFA flavorings I ordered, they've spelled out the brand name like these 2 examples below:

    Flavor Apprentice Blueberry Candy (PG) - 10mL
    Flavor Apprentice DX Coconut Candy - 2oz

    OSDIY has used fa on their invoices I've gotten, since at least early 2016, as part of their SKU identification numbers, ie.
    fa-citp-10 (then beside it) Flavor Apprentice - Citrus Punch II - 10mL

    For Flavour Art...my invoices have fl in their SKU identification numbers, ie.
    fl-frc-15 (then beside it) Flavour Art - Fresh Cream - 15mL

    *******************************
    Linda did say that at the time they were choosing how to differentiate the labels on flavorings that did or didn't require the special GHS labelling...they had no idea that using the Fa logo would cause any confusion with Flavour Art. In fact, she said they didn't even know about websites like ELR or others, nor that people who make their own eliquids often share recipes online and use abbreviations in those recipes. She said if she HAD known, they'd have probably opted to just stay with the TFA logo, and just make it smaller on the GHS labels, to allow the necessary extra room for all the specifics needed on them. Said as it is now...there's little chance they'll be switching back to it though, because of existing inventory, the need for redesigning logos and labels to do it, etc. She is sorry it's causing any confusion for us who DIY and thanked me for calling her.
     

    ceeceeisme

    Ultra Member
    ECF Veteran
    Aug 30, 2016
    2,204
    9,095
    62
    Niagara Region, ON CANADA
    At what % did you mix?

    I went for 5%. It's pretty strong so I think it can be used anywhere from 3% to 5%. This is probably going to get mellower with some time - it's got a bit of ye olde "throat hit" right now but to me that's not a bad thing. Scratching that itch, you know.

    What I made up is:

    Nutty Stixx
    Stixx Mixx A+ Blend 5%
    FW Creamy Hazelnut 4%
    INW Custard 1%
    FLV Milk & Honey 1%

    No sweetener, which is quite unusual for me. Turns out it doesn't need any.
     

    FranC

    Long time vaper.
    Supporting Member
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
  • Oct 1, 2010
    195,594
    646,086
    New Hampshire
    I went for 5%. It's pretty strong so I think it can be used anywhere from 3% to 5%. This is probably going to get mellower with some time - it's got a bit of ye olde "throat hit" right now but to me that's not a bad thing. Scratching that itch, you know.

    What I made up is:

    Nutty Stixx
    Stixx Mixx A+ Blend 5%
    FW Creamy Hazelnut 4%
    INW Custard 1%
    FLV Milk & Honey 1%

    No sweetener, which is quite unusual for me. Turns out it doesn't need any.
    Ty. Made note of that.
     

    DaveP

    PV Master & Musician
    ECF Veteran
    May 22, 2010
    16,733
    42,646
    Central GA
    My Nicotine River Butter Pecan 10ml bottle has a stylized Purilium logo printed vertically on the side of the bottle label. The TPA/TFA RY4 Double bottle just has Fa inside a block on the bottom of the label, left side. Maybe the TPA/TFA name was too long to fit and the initials were the only option.

    I'm sure they'll figure out a compromise.
     

    FranC

    Long time vaper.
    Supporting Member
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
  • Oct 1, 2010
    195,594
    646,086
    New Hampshire
    My Nicotine River Butter Pecan 10ml bottle has a stylized Purilium logo printed vertically on the side of the bottle label. The TPA/TFA RY4 Double bottle just has Fa inside a block on the bottom of the label, left side. Maybe the TPA/TFA name was too long to fit and the initials were the only option.

    I'm sure they'll figure out a compromise.
    I'm hoping so. All I plan on getting at NR is the Stixx mixes and the Pur Raspberry. BCF for all else.
     

    NolaMel

    ECF Guru
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Nov 17, 2012
    12,815
    80,994
    New Orleans
    Is the INW Raspberry worth getting?
    It’s a tart sweet. I remixed at 1% and tasted a bit in a tank. It’s slightly perfumy... not sugary sweet, but maybe berry sweet, if that makes sense. I’ll keep using it. A little goes a long way. 2% was wayyyyyyy too strong, and I mix with more flavor than most of y’all
     

    FranC

    Long time vaper.
    Supporting Member
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
  • Oct 1, 2010
    195,594
    646,086
    New Hampshire
    It’s a tart sweet. I remixed at 1% and tasted a bit in a tank. It’s slightly perfumy... not sugary sweet, but maybe berry sweet, if that makes sense. I’ll keep using it. A little goes a long way. 2% was wayyyyyyy too strong, and I mix with more flavor than most of y’all
    Probably just stay with the Pur Raspberry.
     

    PJReid

    Ultra Member
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Jun 2, 2013
    2,929
    14,436
    Virginia
    Is the INW Raspberry worth getting?

    I don't use a lot of raspberries but the INW Malina is, IMO, the best one out there. I like FA's but it tends to get a little floral and I really don't like floral notes. INW Raspberry (Malina) is, to my taste, a perfectly ripe raspberry, with full-bodied flavor.
     

    PJReid

    Ultra Member
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Jun 2, 2013
    2,929
    14,436
    Virginia
    It’s a tart sweet. I remixed at 1% and tasted a bit in a tank. It’s slightly perfumy... not sugary sweet, but maybe berry sweet, if that makes sense. I’ll keep using it. A little goes a long way. 2% was wayyyyyyy too strong, and I mix with more flavor than most of y’all

    Our taste buds really are individualized. :) I get perfumy, floral from FA's Beryl Raspberry but not from INW.
     

    Myk

    Vaping Master
    ECF Veteran
    Jan 1, 2009
    4,889
    10,658
    IL, USA
    they had no idea that using the Fa logo would cause any confusion with Flavour Art. In fact, she said they didn't even know about websites like ELR or others, nor that people who make their own eliquids often share recipes online and use abbreviations in those recipes.

    LOL, people abbreviate on the internet? And vapers seem even worse about it. I don't know half the stuff being talked about in this thread.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: FranC

    Users who are viewing this thread