I think you dropped this in the wrong thread, bro.
indeed I did.. lol. I have so many windows open it isn't even funny.. I think I need a third monitor! 8-o
I think you dropped this in the wrong thread, bro.
Ok, I'll shoot out a few questions.
1.) was there an actual email sent out telling people to not buy from suppliers that are not part of their association?
2.) Does this association know what each of the businesses outside of their current members are doing?
3.) If yes to question 1, Can I get a copy of this email, I'd love to see if they are making false claims.
No one has ever asked me to be part of an association, and if they are now telling people "hey dont buy from him all of his stuff is tainted and doesn't have our approval" that would b e interesting to see.
* I have NOTHING against putting guidelines into place, nor do I have a problem with associations to further our goals as a community, but if your telling me I have to belong to your association or you'll run me out of town, and by the way I have to do thing 1 thing 2 thing 3 to belong. It's only a short hop to you telling me, sell at this price or your out. There is a line and it would need to be drawn, also are you planning on making people pay fees to be part of the "association".
I'll go out of my way to support independents if they can provide me with certification that the quality of their goods is unsurpassed. Associations are OK as long as they aren't overbearing. In my area, there is a group that attempts to make sure no vendors at farmers markets sell below a certain price.
P*sses me off to no end to see associations trump free market pricing.
I would suggest that if you are interested in continuing your business that it would be in your best interests to be a part of this association.
I'm saying this as a nobody consumer who doesn't have a dog in this fight other than wanting to continue to have access to this product.
Here's the reality the regulatory hammer is hanging over all your heads. And the forces arrayed against you are both well funded and politically powerful. There is no way that individually any of you can stand against them. There is very little chance that even by pooling your resources you might prevail. But a little chance is better than no chance which is the alternative.
If you are not a member of this association you should probably get some details on what would be involved in joining it. Sure you don't have too but if you benifit from their activities with out contributing yourself then you are simply a freeloader much like all those people who ..... about unions while enjoying their 40hr work weeks.
As a consumer I can't want to see a list of the suppliers who are a part of this organization I only hope that the two I currently use are on it otherwise I'm going to have to find someone else to buy from.
So no I don't think anyone is telling you that you have to join this organization but if you were smart you would.
No...he was trying to be serious.
It is pretty funny, though.
.
To all concerned about the ECA.
all of the above concerns are valid. The ECA is a newly formed association. There will be a statement...There are some very big players involved and the groundwork is being laid out.
We will need everyone's support (and I do mean everyone's)....
For the act of getting together to battle impending FDA restrictions as a group, I applaud these vendor's efforts.
Hopefully the effort won't slide into the dark-side with efforts of price-fixing, and forcing members into limiting their inventory to please the consortium.
Could you imagine if the ECA decided to impose a blanket restriction on their members...
Like what if they said "The markup is WAY better on little bottles. Hey, let's ALL just sell little 15ml bottles instead of 30 or 50ml. As long as we are at it, let's limit it to 24 mg, that'll take care of those "DIY diluters" cutting into our margin. Anyone who doesn't comply is OUT."
Would the ECA have to power to do that?
Perhaps the statement of intention should be brought forth prior to asking for support...
Thoughts anybody?
.
.
.
No ECA member wants to respond to my question ?
I would suggest that if you are interested in continuing your business that it would be in your best interests to be a part of this association.
Well, I wasn't trying to be serious; I WAS serious. Maybe it won't be so funny when you see a few vendors shut down. I think many of us do not know or intentionally mislead people to believe that we are "campaigning" to prevent e-cigs becoming illegal. Folks! IT IS ALREADY ILLEGAL, pursuant to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act, Section 505 (21 USC 355) and other provisions therein.
We are campaigning to make the illegal product legal by, among other things, demonstrating that we ourselves can address the genuine public health concerns by ourselves, wihout government regulations.
However, as a consumer and vaper, I am so fed up with some of the "suppliers." So much, I am looking forward to the day when Chris Jensen at NBC shows up at one of these suppliers, show a video of 12-year boy ordering and receiving a syringe and a bottle laced with nicotine, but labeled as "Strawberry 11mg." Let's see how many senators going to stand next to us on that.
You know if anyone gets sick or die due to misuse of e-liquid, what's going to happen to the vendor? Reckless endangerment, criminally negligent homocide, ring any bell? We are talking about a real jail time. I and many customers are so fed up that in fact I am willing to file amicus curiae or affidavit to the sentencing and parole hearing, indicating that these vendors were fully aware of the danger and they had been amply warned multiple times.
Just to clarify, fraud is covered in RICO, but not reporting and complaining about somebody selling illegal products. Ongoing criminal enterprise, forfeiture of assets, sound familiar to you?
Selling illegal products anyway they see fit in wanton disregard of public safety for quick-bucks--American Dream Scarface edition? Tobacco and alcohol are tightly regulated BY government under the penalty of fine and jail term. We want to regulate e-cigs with harsh words and dirty look? Yeah right. Do you want government regulations (with permit and JAIL TERM)?
Frankly, I don't think many suppliers and their "alter-ego" on ECF understand the genuine frustration that many customers feel about them (some of them). Many of us are this close, this close to go to our senators, FDA, parent advocacy groups, and big pharmaceutical companies and ask them to regulate this industry and shut down many of you. Some of you are dragging down the whole PV community.
So what can I say? Keep that up and see what happens. Maybe government will give everyone a free pass to sell e-cigs anyway you want....... NOT! (okay, that was a joke).
Sounds like you took your persuasive writing tips from the Early Teamsters/Mafia guidebook.
Fuggetaboutit!
Can I start calling you Paulie Fatlips?
IT IS ALREADY ILLEGAL, pursuant to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act, Section 505 (21 USC 355) and other provisions therein.
***
Many of us are this close, this close to go to our senators, FDA, parent advocacy groups, and big pharmaceutical companies and ask them to regulate this industry and shut down many of you. Some of you are dragging down the whole PV community.
So what can I say? Keep that up and see what happens. Maybe government will give everyone a free pass to sell e-cigs anyway you want....... NOT! (okay, that was a joke).
Sounds like you took your persuasive writing tips from the Early Teamsters/Mafia guidebook.
Fuggetaboutit!
Can I start calling you Paulie Fatlips?
And I maintain suppliers who sit on the sidelines during this fight and don't step up and help out don't deserve my business because you're just another freeloader.
3) ECA needs to be willing to police and work with government to SHUT DOWN ANY US E-CIG VENDORS WHO DO NOT HAVE THE CERTIFICATION.