So why is mixing by weight better than mixing by volume?

Status
Not open for further replies.

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,588
1
84,625
So-Cal
  • Like
Reactions: DaveP

PeterKay

Super Member
ECF Veteran
May 1, 2020
743
1,170
Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,588
1
84,625
So-Cal
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: kas122461

PeterKay

Super Member
ECF Veteran
May 1, 2020
743
1,170
Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Here is another word to research... "Denatured" Alcohol.

What Is Denatured Alcohol?.
I also have a bottle of "methylated spirit" in the house, seems to be similar to the stuff you posted earlier. Been using it as a degreaser prior to painting metals and wood, stinks terrible, violet/purple clear in color
 

PeterKay

Super Member
ECF Veteran
May 1, 2020
743
1,170
Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
The Long and the Short of it is for Atomizer Cleaning (or doing DIY Diluting) Vodka is a Safe Choice.

And when you're done, you can put a Glug or Two into a Glass of OJ. If you're are into that.
Not much of a vodka person, I'm more into scotch and bourbon.
I'm pretty sure that pure isopropanol is also safe since I rinse it really well with water. And it's cheaper than vodka down here
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,588
1
84,625
So-Cal
Not much of a vodka person, I'm more into scotch and bourbon.
I'm pretty sure that pure isopropanol is also safe since I rinse it really well with water. And it's cheaper than vodka down here

When I drank, I Didn't drink a lot of Vodka. Rum was my Poison of choice. But I Always drank Screwdrivers when I was in an Airport. Or on a Plane.

No Exceptions.

LOL
 

PeterKay

Super Member
ECF Veteran
May 1, 2020
743
1,170
Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Well I guess they aren't required to list everything because my bottle of 91% Isopropyl alcohol states:

Active ingredients: Isopropyl alcohol (91% conc.)
Inactive ingredients: purified water
Might be simply because yours is not what's called in US rubbing alcohol. From the brief research and my understanding, manufacturers are only required to add the coloring and all those nasty chemicals if ethyl alcohol is in the solution.
 

UncLeJunkLe

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 29, 2010
10,617
2
28,643
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Might be simply because yours is not what's called in US rubbing alcohol. From the brief research and my understanding, manufacturers are only required to add the coloring and all those nasty chemicals if ethyl alcohol is in the solution.

Maybe.

In the USA, at least where I'm from, the terms "rubbing alcohol" and "isopropyl alcohol" are used interchangeably.

I haven't seen "rubbing alcohol" on a label for ages. "Rubbing" is, however, mentioned as a use case on the label sometimes (depends on the brand).

For instance (see second bullet point),

IspropylAlcohol_800x.jpg


Maybe it's only Ethyl alcohol that has other chemicals in it?
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,588
1
84,625
So-Cal
As if this can be More Confusing. And a Hodge Podge of Generic and Chemical terms.

Isopropyl alcohol - Wikipedia

They Don't need to Add Anything to Isopropanol to make it Taste Bad. Or to make you Sick if you Drink It. Or to Exclude you from a Liquor Tax.

Because it Does. And it Will. And it Isn't Taxable.

LOL
 
Last edited:

DaveP

PV Master & Musician
ECF Veteran
May 22, 2010
16,733
42,645
Central GA
I've been mixing liquid for close to a year now and have been mixing by volume, with various graduated cylinders, and recently, syringes for the small measurements.

Full disclosure: I'm a water/wastewater engineer and calculate feed rates, dilutions, volumes, and weights all day long, using metric and English units. I can figure out how many liters/hour of a chemical of a given concentration must be added to treat a stream of millions of gallons/day of water to achieve the required final concentration. Calculations with water based systems are convenient because one liter of water has a mass of one kg. Certain shortcuts can be employed due to this fact. Not so fast with English units.

We buy nicotine liquid that is measured in mg/ml (mass/volume) of solution, not mg/kg (commonly called % by weight) of solution. The final product is also expressed in mg/ml (mass/volume) not mg/kg of solution. As long as the total mg of nicotine is properly measured and calculated, and the total volume of product is properly measured and calculated, the results are perfectly accurate (at least in the spreadsheet).

The only aspect where % by weight would be useful would be in calculating VG/PG ratio. Since the specific gravity of VG and PG are pretty close, the results of a volumetric calculation seem close enough. Who really cares whether the VG/PG ratio is 75/25 or 75.3/24.7? Measuring by weight, and making the conversions just seems like so much mental masturb@tion.

I haven't read much about the process of mixing by weight, so perhaps mixing by weight is EASIER than mixing by volume, maybe less messy, and maybe its easier to make accurate measurements by weight than by volume. Graduated cylinders CAN be hard to read if the lighting is wrong, they have to be level, and you have to look at it on a horizontal plane, etc. And then you have to clean and dry them. If that's what this is all about, then, fine, we don't have an argument.

I suppose that mixing by weight also has a certain mystique about it, and I wouldn't doubt that this can result in hype.

Comments?

IMO, what counts is that you get the mix right as the recipe states. I've always mixed using a scale and I find it easy, but lots of people like mixing by volume.

I add the PG and VG first, then the flavors followed by the nic base, taring the scale to zero after each addition. Order isn't critical as long as you get each one fairly accurate. A good shake at the end of a mix is crucial. I shake until I see tiny bubbles that fill the bottle. As those bubbles rise, they help to homogenize the mix.

If you think about it, both produce identical results. Whether you are looking at lines marked on a bottle or the display on the scale, it all comes out right. Past that, it's whatever method you enjoy more.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Letitia

CMD-Ky

Highly Esteemed Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 15, 2013
5,321
42,395
KY
I would use vodka but I fear my tears watching vodka go to waste would add unwanted salt to the mixture.

I don't doubt it works. But, my recollection is that rubbing alcohol is not exactly friendly to us except in rubbing. It has toxic chemicals added so we don't drink it. Don't drink it!
So, I'd be concerned about any residuals remaining after the alcohol has evaporated.
I think vodka works very well and is harmless.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Letitia
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread