The Self Juicing Box way to quit Analogs

Status
Not open for further replies.

ACM

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 11, 2009
371
7
You modders probably know who I am referring to, but have you seen the woman on here with like every Mod? She has pictures of them all together... It is unbelievable how many she has...:vapor:

I saw that. It's kind of mind-blowing, actually. She must have a ton of money tied up in them, considering I don't think she's an avid reviewer who received many freebies for review purposes. It's pretty cool seeing them all together. Did she mention what her favorites were? I can't remember.
 

ACM

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 11, 2009
371
7
i was kinda curious about those, do you have any problems with the juice leaking back into the case?

I'm a little curious about that, too. I saw one video review on the UMP, which is similar in appearance and materials, and the reviewer said that it did leak back into the case more than he liked. At least one wood mod, the Ali'i, has a catch cup that collects any overflow and diverts it back into the bottle (or serves as a reservoir to feed the atty a bit more.) I'd like to know how the REO Grand handles that. With a bottom feeder, t's not an uncommon thing to overdo it when squeezing the bottle, especially when you're first getting used to the system.
 

MXBNW

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 15, 2010
10,355
6,745
NW Washingtion
www.e-cigarette-forum.com
ACM: Most Mod reviews do not get there mod for free, there mod collecters or vaping enthusiasts. well at leas the ones that have a lot of mods.
Me I am a Collertor and vaping enthusiest. The more I now the more I can help others.

Just a FYI :)

I saw that. It's kind of mind-blowing, actually. She must have a ton of money tied up in them, considering I don't think she's an avid reviewer who received many freebies for review purposes. It's pretty cool seeing them all together. Did she mention what her favorites were? I can't remember.
 

ACM

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 11, 2009
371
7
ACM: Most Mod reviews do not get there mod for free, there mod collecters or vaping enthusiasts. well at leas the ones that have a lot of mods.

Many reviewers do provide the disclaimer that they paid for the product they reviewed, which I personally think is the best way to go to ensure the most honest, unbiased reviewing. In fact, most of the video reviews I've watched do include that disclaimer. But some reviewers get comps, and that's ok, too. Even those reviewers have been, from what I've seen, pretty much fair and unbiased in their comments.

Regardless, I didn't mean to imply that I thought reviewers were moochers :blush: I was just so blown away by the number of PVs the person I was referring to had, that I could not fathom the expense that went into that impressive collection.
 

Rhapsodies Fire

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Oct 18, 2010
26,180
41,035
Bow, WA, USA
www.reosmods.com
I'm a little curious about that, too. I saw one video review on the UMP, which is similar in appearance and materials, and the reviewer said that it did leak back into the case more than he liked. At least one wood mod, the Ali'i, has a catch cup that collects any overflow and diverts it back into the bottle (or serves as a reservoir to feed the atty a bit more.) I'd like to know how the REO Grand handles that. With a bottom feeder, t's not an uncommon thing to overdo it when squeezing the bottle, especially when you're first getting used to the system.

Hi ACM...
So, the juice bottle system on the REOs is a closed air system, so the excess goes back into the tube and bottle or is drawn into the atomizer on the next draw. If one squeezes too much, it will pool in the cup until it is used. The only time my REOs have ever leaked was due to my laziness....I didn't screw the bottle back in place correctly, and a positive seal was never made....and then I squeezed half my juice into the body of the REO before I knew what was going on. Not one of my more brilliant moments to be sure. It took only a couple of minutes to clean it up and start using it again. No harm done.
 

MXBNW

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 15, 2010
10,355
6,745
NW Washingtion
www.e-cigarette-forum.com
All is good some do get there mods for free but have the disclaimer (By law)

I have a lot of mods more then I can list now or on my profile. And it can get expensive.

for me it was my search for the right mod or ecig now that I have found it its not so bad. just juice batts and attys.


Many reviewers do provide the disclaimer that they paid for the product they reviewed, which I personally think is the best way to go to ensure the most honest, unbiased reviewing. In fact, most of the video reviews I've watched do include that disclaimer. But some reviewers get comps, and that's ok, too. Even those reviewers have been, from what I've seen, pretty much fair and unbiased in their comments.

Regardless, I didn't mean to imply that I thought reviewers were moochers :blush: I was just so blown away by the number of PVs the person I was referring to had, that I could not fathom the expense that went into that impressive collection.
 

ACM

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 11, 2009
371
7
I am hoping to find my ultimate vaper in the Ali'i, but it's pretty clear to me that a person almost couldn't go wrong with a REO, a Phidias, or a Kaji. All of these mods are reviewing as the best out there in the category of bottom fed juice boxes. I can certainly see how easy it could be to rack up a sizable collection.

It's interesting how vaping has become a hobby for many people, in a way that makes me think of what smoking must have been like in the 1950s and 1960s. Today, we all get into trying out different models and variations, different accessories, different juices. Back then it was all about different cigarettes, pipes, tobaccos, Zippo lighters, collectible ashtrays, etc. The "Golden Age of Smoking". I wonder if this could be called the "Golden Age of Vaping", or if the best is yet to come.

But if we all start discussing where to buy the best vaping jackets, I think I'll call it quits! :laugh:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread