The "Well its gotta be bad for you!" Mentality

Status
Not open for further replies.

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,654
1
84,850
So-Cal
Vendors that voluntarily disclose contents and provide 3rd party testing results. If the listed ingredients seem kosher then they would see my money. I would be perfectly fine with them also having a blue colored liquid in their line. I just wouldn't pick that particular one.

I think Posting Independent 3rd Party Verification of what is in an e-liquid would be a Fantastic Step in the Right Direction.
 

AndriaD

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 24, 2014
21,253
50,807
64
LawrencevilleGA
angryvaper.crypticsites.com
"Funny, I consider the current situation to be a middle ground. Most vendors disclose the primary ingredients to some extent. If a consumer has concerns that are more specific, they can search that information out. If a vendor puts something in a liquid that is recognized as legally harmful, they can be found liable for any damages/injury that results. If vendors are found to be dishonest in their disclosure, consumers can choose to purchase elsewhere. Just because they don't HAVE to disclose, doesn't mean that they WON'T."

If a vendor makes a claim, that is found to be false, I believe they are subject to litigation or could be if a case for harm can be made.


Yes, I think the current regulations protecting consumers are entirely sufficient. I strenuously object to this idea that e-cigs are somehow "special," requiring their own laws, committees, regulations, TAXES, or whatever else TPTB want to throw into the mix. That is just WRONG, that the gov't can just designate some consumer product and say we're going to regulate/tax that, it's sinful -- that's a religious judgment which has no place in our gov't, and it's also moral and economic fascism.

And yes, for whoever may bring it up, I've long felt that way about tobacco and alcohol, too, though I no longer partake of either.

Andria
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,654
1
84,850
So-Cal

caramel

Vaping Master
Dec 23, 2014
3,492
10,735
I agree.

I just Posted AEMSA because I was Unsure if You or anyone else knew what they Are. And what they Do.

I heard about them and a controversy about WTA.

I am sure that there is a place in the market for a vendor that is not AEMSA affiliated but practices disclosure / testing / WTA as an option. Or you could get your liquid from AEMSA vendor and add WTA yourself. Or something to that effect.

The problem is when the govt stomps in, removes all options, and thou shall vape Vuse or nothing.
 

englishmick

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 25, 2014
6,674
36,270
Naptown, Indiana
If given 2 Black and White Choices, Vendors can put ANYTHING they want in an e-Liquid and not have to Disclose Anything, verses Government Regulations as to what Ingredients are considered GRAS, I would have to go with the Later.

Tuff Choice. But I is what it is.

A Shame a Middle Ground can not be Found.

Trouble is the list of ingredients considered to be GRAS compliant might be really short.
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,654
1
84,850
So-Cal
Trouble is the list of ingredients considered to be GRAS compliant might be really short.

Maybe. Maybe Not.

Flavoring Percentage in an e-Liquid is going to Play a Big Role.

And if a Flavorings is Shown to be a Problem, Isn't this something that people should Know About? Kinda that Informed Choice thing.

And Besides. People can Add Any Flavorings (or Colorants) via DIY if they want. Right?
 

Lessifer

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 5, 2013
8,309
28,986
Sacramento, California
Trouble is the list of ingredients considered to be GRAS compliant might be really short.

I'm pretty sure the number of items on a list of ingredients considered GRAS for repeated daily inhalation in a personal vaporizer is exactly 0. Not because they aren't "safe" but because they haven't been fully tested in this application.

Maybe. Maybe Not.

Flavoring Percentage in an e-Liquid is going to Play a Big Role.

And if a Flavorings is Shown to be a Problem, Isn't this something that people should Know About? Kinda that Informed Choice thing.

And Besides. People can Add Any Flavorings (or Colorants) via DIY if they want. Right?

Just because something is not on the list as GRAS, does not necessarily mean it is a problem, that is the point.
 

skoony

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jul 31, 2013
5,692
9,953
70
saint paul,mn,usa
So it keeps getting back to a Vendor can put ANYTHING they want in an e-Liquid. And it is up to the Consumer to Choose if they want to Inhale it. Knowing or Not Knowing what they are Inhaling.

Not going to Debate Right or Wrong on this. But in the USA that we live in Today, I don't think this is Going to Fly.

no they can't put anything they want in e-juice.
if they make e-juice by definition they are using
FDA approved food or pharmaceutical grade
PG,VG,nicotine,flavors,colors and distilled water.
anything else is not e-juice per say.
some are extracting flavors and steeping tobacco
leaves but readily admit to doing so.
there is no vendor to date just dumping any old thing into e-juice.
mike
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,654
1
84,850
So-Cal
I'm pretty sure the number of items on a list of ingredients considered GRAS for repeated daily inhalation in a personal vaporizer is exactly 0. Not because they aren't "safe" but because they haven't been fully tested in this application.



Just because something is not on the list as GRAS, does not necessarily mean it is a problem, that is the point.

Didn't say it was. Didn't say it Wasn't.

But wouldn't it be Nice to Know that a Flavor has been shown to be GRAS for Direct Inhalation in the Amounts that are seen Daily by Vapers?
 

AndriaD

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 24, 2014
21,253
50,807
64
LawrencevilleGA
angryvaper.crypticsites.com
Didn't say it was. Didn't say it Wasn't.

But wouldn't it be Nice to Know that a Flavor has been shown to be GRAS for Direct Inhalation in the Amounts that are seen Daily by Vapers?

It would, but considering how things are going, it wouldn't surprise me one bit for the FDA to come out and say that all those GRAS food flavors (safe for DIGESTIVE INGESTION!) are poisonous for inhalation! :facepalm: That would be right up there with Dow selling PG to anyone who wants to use it -- except ejuice makers. :facepalm:

Andria
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,654
1
84,850
So-Cal
no they can't put anything they want in e-juice.
if they make e-juice by definition they are using
FDA approved food or pharmaceutical grade
PG,VG,nicotine,flavors,colors and distilled water.
anything else is not e-juice per say.
some are extracting flavors and steeping tobacco
leaves but readily admit to doing so.
there is no vendor to date just dumping any old thing into e-juice.
mike

Not sure where this Definition came from?

As to putting Odd things in e-Liquids? Do you consider Titanium Dioxide a Odd Thing.

Don't get me wrong. I don't see Most Retailers Intentionally using something that is Known to be a Problem. The Vast Majority I believe want to put out a "Safe" product.

But the Vast Majority of Retailers do not have In-House Chemist or do Outside Verification of the Ingredients they use. They just rely on what their Vendors say in (or Not In) a 55 Gallon Drum of PG, VG or Nicotine Base.
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,654
1
84,850
So-Cal
It would, but considering how things are going, it wouldn't surprise me one bit for the FDA to come out and say that all those GRAS food flavors (safe for DIGESTIVE INGESTION!) are poisonous for inhalation! :facepalm: That would be right up there with Dow selling PG to anyone who wants to use it -- except ejuice makers. :facepalm:

Andria

It may be that Many Food Flavorings are Not GRAS for Direct Inhalation in the Levels found in many e-Liquids.

And DOW doesn't want to sell to the e-Cigarette market because they want to Limit their Liability. When a Smoker switches to e-Cigarettes and then gets Sick, can they argue that it was the e-Liquids that made them Sick? An then Sue the Ingredients Makers?
 

DaveP

PV Master & Musician
ECF Veteran
May 22, 2010
16,733
42,646
Central GA
By definition...Really? :facepalm:

I guess Dekang and Liqua aren't really making e-liquid. Their ingredients aren't always FDA approved or pharma grade... Dekang even uses something which they call 'tar'...

Tar sounds like something akin to a tobacco extract, like NET. It isn't broken out in their FAQ. In fact, they specifically state that all ingredients are USP. The truth may depend on their honesty. I'd like to see the FDA require proof of ecig ingredient purity and safety. That would cost slightly more to the consumer, but I'd feel better about my future health.

Dekang juice purity FAQ
FAQ

They talk a good game about their products in this link.
http://www.dekangbio.com/
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread