I can show you threads on ECF where people are saying other things. Ones I've seen you participate on.
Constantly comparing ecig saftey to smoking safety, doesn't really answer a whole lot, and instead just reminds anyone paying attention that these people likely engaged in some form of smoker's guilt. I know I have (many many years ago).
Let the likes of Dr. F. do what he does and while people may always be able to say, "it's not as bad as smoking," I think some will change their tune from, "this saved my life" to something along lines of, "this is hurting me and others who I do it around. I really have to stop."
Let me google that for youI guess the question that popped into my head when I read this was .... "Well what is good about it?"
Birth: The major cause of death...![]()
I couldn't even begin to list all the things I've done that are "bad" for me over the years and I am still here. Life is full of choices. Seems like there are an awful lot of people that want others to make those choices for them and even more that believe it is their calling to oblige.
To dispute this diagnosis is not a productive endeavor, the opinion of guilt has been formed and once formed has become unshakable.
So in a Nutshell, are you Saying that you Believe that there are No Risks involved in Inhaling Food Flavorings, Colorants and Artificial Sweeteners in the Dosages and Frequencies that an Average Vaper does?
I can't even imagine how you got this from what I said, but am used to you not reading posts accurately, asking a loaded question, and only filling your response posts with questions.
So are you Saying that there Is some Risk associated with Vaping?
Because you Kinda Dodged the Question.
Well, ok then........I guess.You want to take that as, "Vaping is bad for you". I suggest to repeat basic elementary school, Grammar. Not that mine is any good.
That's ANTZ position after unsuccessfully trying to find a real scare. If people felt for it then the ANTZ reached their goal.
Vaping is classified as tobacco harm reduction, by researchers who vape in the vaping community, and by vape-friendly advocacy and science groups.
And all you do by repeating what you said here is give yourself license to call people ANTZ if they see vaping as "harm reduction" rather than "harm free".
Well the antz policy is working a treat isn't when "is vaping really safe" threads are popping up on most vaping forums seriously people if your not sure research it like I did when I started vaping these threads are becoming tiresome and counter productive not to mention the field day opponents could have linking to the vaping community questioning itself. As for smokers\vapers guilt I've never heard anything so ridiculous in my over forty years of life a sure sign of people with nothing better to do with their time. It's really simple if your going to take any activity up research it and find out about it and make an educated decision for yourself if you can't or won't do that good for you don't start threads on forums asking about it. I smoked for over thirty years tried everything out there to quit and couldnt heard about vaping looked into it and decided whatever else it was better then tobacco smoking over two years in lungs are clear, breathing problems gone and I dont smell disgusting so there you go.
You can twist yourself inside out on any issue on an internet forum and never get any nearer to the truth or a reality you can live with go look up the research read through it and make your choice.
there has to be some inherent danger/safety risk..
That's ANTZ position after unsuccessfully trying to find a real scare. If people felt for it then the ANTZ reached their goal.
Saying that something MAY have inherent danger/safety risks is one thing.And all you do by repeating what you said here is give yourself license to call people ANTZ if they see vaping as "harm reduction" rather than "harm free".