Thanks for researching this skoony. Tragic story! My concern lies in the fact that the article says "liquid nicotine" and then the author immediately references e liquid and/or e cigarettes. Because of my vaping experience, "liquid nicotine" to me means concentrated nic or pure nic not e liquid. I don't think that the general public or legislators would make that distinction. We don't know yet what exactly caused the child's death other than nicotine poisoning. I know e liquid is dangerous. But, I don't know how dangerous it is. There in lies the problem. How dangerous is e liquid? How many ml ingested would be considered life threatening? different strengths? I think it be to our advantage to find these things out. I also think it would be a good idea to have some larger vaping organization try to educate the general public about the difference between e liquid and concentrated nicotine liquid. I'm not against reasonable legislation and safeguards. However, I would like to see someone get "in front of" any misconceptions about vaping, for our own good.