That's misleading. With VV, you also need to do the same things, in addition to whatever VW would have automatically done for you.
Also misleading. You can adjust VW. It's even easier than VV because you don't have to waste time dealing with resistance. You don't have to stick with the same vape. That's nonsense.
No, it always compensate for resistance, no matter how you use it. What makes you think VW needs the same juice, wick, airflow, and atomizer to work?
No one has ever said anything like that. All I'm saying is VW is better than VV, for the purpose of maintaining power.... because power, by definition, is heat transfer per second and we're heating a wire and that takes, duh, heat. Why do I even need to state the obvious?
I'll keep this short. People touted the set and forget of VW all the time on here when it first came out, you know, before March.
So let's recap what you have said, in VV and VW you still have to adjust the setting for different variables or preferences at that time. But VW is better because you don't have to account for resistance. You'd still adjust for taste and other things.
I don't think anyone who has had a VV for more than a day needs a calculator to know at what voltages they like different resistances , so that part is automatic. The rest is adjusting to taste and other variables... kind of like you do in VW.
So basically, you are saying that VW is better because someone doesn't have to learn their preferences for one particular variable? Now you can blah blah about how it's better because it compensates for resistance (I've never said it didn't but you apparently took it that way) but that is not really a practical, real world advantage. It can be a preference and it's certainly a nice principal but I don't really think not spending the 4 seconds it takes when you screw a new atty on to read the resistance yourself is a real advantage. If you're rebuilding, you'd already know the answer to that anyway.
Since you are just going to argue principals against practice...let me ask you this...in your 4 months of vaping how many and which vw devices have you had...how many provari's...what is your impression of both? Did the VW make a big difference between these VW devices and your provari? The thread is really about china VW's vs provari's (though it pretended to be about manufacturing costs)...since we actually use these devices and don't just talk about what they calculate, let me know your thoughts.
Different juices, different wicks, different airflow, even different drip tip lengths...all cause adjustments either way. Real world difference is changing a different number to adjust the output either way. Maybe one way a little more often than the other but it's not really an issue for most people. Plus, again, the provari is more accurate than any of these devices under load with a single battery.
I lied about the short part