They'll also develop some sort of blood or urine test that will tell them if you are getting your nicotine by vape or by cigarettes.
The rules as they stand today. It's the death by a thousand cuts. One day it will be illegal to vape. They won't outright ban it, but it will be illegal to vape in rental properties, government housing, outdoors, etc. insurance companies will deny coverage. FB and Twitter will ban it, and everyone else will follow suit. It started back with FDA v Solterro and continues today.
They'll also develop some sort of blood or urine test that will tell them if you are getting your nicotine by vape or by cigarettes.
Hmm. I wonder if that could actually be done.
They did in India. Illegal to simply possess vape therefore anyone who stockpiled before the ban is illegally possessing.
The Unfolding Tragedy of India's Vape Prohibition
They also did it in Thailand. Illegal to possess under the grounds that it is illegal to import. If you possess it you must have imported it therefore you are in violation of illegally importing a restricted product.
Vaping in Thailand is Illegal. The Laws and Penalties in 2020.
But I get it, this isn't Thailand or India. But it's not the USA anymore either.
Well, maybe not a brand new mod or a brand new atty, but what about nicotine? Could they not train dogs to stiff-out nicotine freebase and salt?
Just playing devil's advocate here.
Are you being serious? Who is they?They'll also develop some sort of blood or urine test that will tell them if you are getting your nicotine by vape or by cigarettes.
If I visit Thailand can I bring my gear or is this for locals only?
Are you being serious? Who is they?
Then I will probably avoid it.I have no idea, not an expert. But if that article is telling the truth, then I don't see why it would not apply to everyone since it's illegal to import. If it were legal for a foreigner to import, then that intentionally (or idiotically) creates a black market.
Ok. Who is they?I'm very serious.
Ok. Who is they?
OK. So if that test could be created would an insurer put cig people and vapers in the same boat or one better than the other. From my experience I see both in the same boat right now and punish them the same way.If I may interject, "they" would be the same "people" who figured out how to check for cotinine.
If the powers that be want to know who is vaping as opposed to smoking (for insurance purposes or whatever other reason(s)) they would commission "them" to figure out how to figure that out...IF it's even possible.
OK. So if that test could be created would an insurer put cig people and vapers in the same boat or one better than the other. From my experience I see both in the same boat right now and punish them the same way.
Interestingly now my insurance only puts a punishment tax on tobacco products so I use synthetic nic if and when I decide to vape nicotine.
OK. So if that test could be created would an insurer put cig people and vapers in the same boat or one better than the other. From my experience I see both in the same boat right now and punish them the same way.
My insurance states tobacco products not nic. If they test for nic then people trying to stop on "approved" products and heavy vegetable eaters may test positive. I am not too concerned about that. It would only come up if I had a big bill.But if they decide to test you, it's for nicotine use, not tobacco use. You'd fail even with synthetic nicotine.
That post led me to picture a group of pod totin' seniors being led out of a nursing home into a paddy wagon. It made me laugh during these dark days.
My insurance states tobacco products not nic. If they test for nic
When my mom who is 84 went into a nursing/assisted living facility last year in the rules it stated vaping was prohibited but smoking was allowed outdoors