Bartender Says Its Against the Law

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vapor Pete

The Vapor Pope
ECF Veteran
Mar 14, 2009
2,847
2,134
Rochester, NY
This new batch of e-smokers popping up seem to have a different perspective on the subject

New batch? Popping up???


and if you guys don't start to speak up for your right to vape, that will get trashed too
They want to ban e-cigs
The government wants your money but they don't want you to have any rights

Speaking up, my friend, usually does not include acting rebellious. And as Tropical Bob has said over and over, we do not have a RIGHT to vape. Yes they want to ban them... and acting like a child who thinks he has the right to do as he pleases may very well lead to said ban. So thank you, kind sir in advance. And I absolutley agree with what you just said about the government.
My best,
-VP
 

Vapor Pete

The Vapor Pope
ECF Veteran
Mar 14, 2009
2,847
2,134
Rochester, NY
Truth is you don't have the right to vape on private property, and trying to would alienate people.
I vape in smoking areas only.
I believe the key to ecigs acceptance is through actual smokers not through challenging people.


You posted it as I was typing it!!! Appearently you too sir are a brick wall also... see that krew persons post calling me a brick wall because of that exact stance.
My best,
-VP
 

Vapor Pete

The Vapor Pope
ECF Veteran
Mar 14, 2009
2,847
2,134
Rochester, NY
he understands your posts
he just thinks that you are wrong

As do I

Nope, I dont think he does. And I am sorry you feel I am wrong. Especially when this isnt about being right or wrong. I have read some of your posts, and I can find things you say that I agree with. You dont have to ageree with me. You are free to vape like an ape my friend, wherever your little heart tells you to. I am just saying that may not be the best way to gain backing for our cause. Im sorry you are not of that opinion.
My best,
-VP
 

Avid

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
I don't give a flying fig about insulting anti-smokers. I despise them. Non-smokers are fine, but the true anti-smoker is someone I never want to be within two feet of. SO, if vaping or smoking near them drives them away, that is a bonus.

Sadly, the little buggers vote :(

Maybe we should wait until e-cigs and niquid are in the clear before we alienate them all? :shock:

Until then, let's try to work and play well with others :)
 

Vapor Pete

The Vapor Pope
ECF Veteran
Mar 14, 2009
2,847
2,134
Rochester, NY
I don't give a flying fig about insulting anti-smokers. I despise them. Non-smokers are fine, but the true anti-smoker is someone I never want to be within two feet of. SO, if vaping or smoking near them drives them away, that is a bonus.

I see what you are saying. However, who do you think got the smoking bans put in place? Not non-smokers. ANTI-smokers. It will drive them away... right to the voting booth. So they can continue to elect the likes of Sen. Leutenberg, who is pushing to ban your (and mine) PV's.
My best,
-VP
 

TheEmperorOfIceCream

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 1, 2008
1,092
8
62
London, UK
I appreciate your input. And again, I agree with you on some points. However, I am talking about gaining public respect and backing for PV's. Please understand Emp... my stance is simply that Saying "Nanenanenana...look what I can do... I can GET AROUND the smoking bans...and continue to "smoke" in front of, and next to, all you smoke haters!! hahahaha!!!" is NOW NOT the way we as respectable vapers should be conducting ourselves. PERCEPTION.
My best,
-VP

Hi Pete,

I doubt if anybody's doing that, regardless of the heat in the conversations on here (which I am occasionally guilty of turning up).

I saw a post of yours on another thread along the lines of "if you can't SMOKE here, I won't VAPE here". Not really arguing with your choices, wouldn't impose mine on you. (Choices, that is - I would impose my harmless vapour on ya)

However, given that I bought the thing precisely to vape where I used to smoke, my position is different. My primary socialisation is in bars and the ban was a big deal for me (and most of the regular patrons).

Guilty as charged as far as getting round the ban, and I think the core of any disagreement we might have is right there. I do use my e-cigs publicly because I want people to become accustomed to seeing something that looks like smoking without assuming it's a hot cig and having a fit (I go redline if someone screeches at me). Hanging with the smokers won't achieve that (non-smokers don't go near the smoking shelters and tend not to look at them, in my experience). As I said earlier (maybe another thread), smokers aren't the people who need to be convinced. In my experience, most non-smokers don't really give a crap about vaping, or smoking, one way or the other. The evangelists do, though, and they're the people I welcome vocal disagreement with.

Somewhere up the line Lu posted about not vaping in a library. I got all arsey about her use of the term flaunting but I think in retrospect I should have made a more obvious point, ie who would smoke or vape in a library?

I vape in bars, theatres, sports stadia, trains and aircraft. All places where I used to smoke.

The meat of the several threads on this issue seems to be:

a) don't vape in public because it will be badly received which may motivate blissfully unaware disapprovers to actively push for a ban / don't vape in public to be considerate to other people because they may be upset by the appearance of smoking.

b) Vape in public as is your right with a (currently) legal device / I'm not doing anything wrong, in fact this is healthier for me and the bystanders so screw the dissenters.

What it comes down to for me is I see more value (and more chance of acceptance) in doing it openly than in trooping off with the poor sods still stuck on analogs.

I also think the proponents of either viewpoint are pretty much polarised - and never the twain...

All the best

Emp
 

Vapor Pete

The Vapor Pope
ECF Veteran
Mar 14, 2009
2,847
2,134
Rochester, NY
Hi Pete,

I doubt if anybody's doing that, regardless of the heat in the conversations on here (which I am occasionally guilty of turning up).

I saw a post of yours on another thread along the lines of "if you can't SMOKE here, I won't VAPE here". Not really arguing with your choices, wouldn't impose mine on you. (Choices, that is - I would impose my harmless vapour on ya)

However, given that I bought the thing precisely to vape where I used to smoke, my position is different. My primary socialisation is in bars and the ban was a big deal for me (and most of the regular patrons).

Guilty as charged as far as getting round the ban, and I think the core of any disagreement we might have is right there. I do use my e-cigs publicly because I want people to become accustomed to seeing something that looks like smoking without assuming it's a hot cig and having a fit (I go redline if someone screeches at me). Hanging with the smokers won't achieve that (non-smokers don't go near the smoking shelters and tend not to look at them, in my experience). As I said earlier (maybe another thread), smokers aren't the people who need to be convinced. In my experience, most non-smokers don't really give a crap about vaping, or smoking, one way or the other. The evangelists do, though, and they're the people I welcome vocal disagreement with.

Somewhere up the line Lu posted about not vaping in a library. I got all arsey about her use of the term flaunting but I think in retrospect I should have made a more obvious point, ie who would smoke or vape in a library?

I vape in bars, theatres, sports stadia, trains and aircraft. All places where I used to smoke.

The meat of the several threads on this issue seems to be:

a) don't vape in public because it will be badly received which may motivate blissfully unaware disapprovers to actively push for a ban / don't vape in public to be considerate to other people because they may be upset by the appearance of smoking.

b) Vape in public as is your right with a (currently) legal device / I'm not doing anything wrong, in fact this is healthier for me and the bystanders so screw the dissenters.

What it comes down to for me is I see more value (and more chance of acceptance) in doing it openly than in trooping off with the poor sods still stuck on analogs.

I also think the proponents of either viewpoint are pretty much polarised - and never the twain...

All the best

Emp

Well said my friend, and I cannot find anything that I disagree with. I understand if you started vaping in order to continue your social life. I can now see why you take the stance you do. Others on this thread are not so eloquent or repectful in their position. And some here have admitted that they will vape wherever, come hell or high water, no matter what anyone says.
I came to PV's because I sought a way to stop smoking. And found the safety of them to be the better option to tobacco. So I naturally am taking the stance of, let THAT be the way we get to the public, not vaping away in a no-smoking area, where one KNOWS eventually, someone will question and/or confront you. So Im glad you replied.
Maybe Lu will close this thread soon. Redundancy is a killer.
My best,
-VP
 

sherid

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 25, 2008
2,266
493
USA
Just returned from our friend's bar. We live in a smoking ban state, BUT many locally owned bars stopped following the smoking ban about six weeks after it started being enforced two years ago. They were going out of business and decided the defiance was worth it. I always smoke real cigs there in appreciation of their stand against ban tyranny. Tonight, there were about 12 people there....9 of them were smokers. The three non-smokers simply did not care. This bar has had two reports and no fines in over two years. Hiding in the shadows and saying "yes, sir" does not work. Open defiance appears to work, at least where I live.
 

ZambucaLu

ECF Guru
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 23, 2008
10,262
22
Central NY, USA
Somewhere up the line Lu posted about not vaping in a library. I got all arsey about her use of the term flaunting but I think in retrospect I should have made a more obvious point, ie who would smoke or vape in a library?

Do people around here work? LOL

For work, I am sometimes in a library 2-3 hours at a time. I am a heavy vaper. So I should do what? Go outside and vape??? I vape anywhere I need to....as long as I do so discreetly, it has never been a problem. Mind you...I am not much of a bar person....haven't been out to a bar since I started vaping actually.

See, I don't agree that ecigs were invented so people can get around the smoking bans. I believe that was part of it....but I also believe they were invented as a "healthier" alternative to smoking.

And by the same token, I believe a lot of vapers started vaping for that reason, and not mainly because of the bans. But really, what difference does it make why they were invented? Each person has their reason for vaping. Mine is because I see them as a healthier alternative to analogs. Maybe yours is to get around the bans. So?

So you keep doing what you need to do to get around the bans....and I'll keep doing what I have to do to stay away from the analogs. That works, doesn't it?

Lu
 

ZambucaLu

ECF Guru
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 23, 2008
10,262
22
Central NY, USA
Just returned from our friend's bar. We live in a smoking ban state, BUT many locally owned bars stopped following the smoking ban about six weeks after it started being enforced two years ago. They were going out of business and decided the defiance was worth it. I always smoke real cigs there in appreciation of their stand against ban tyranny. Tonight, there were about 12 people there....9 of them were smokers. The three non-smokers simply did not care. This bar has had two reports and no fines in over two years. Hiding in the shadows and saying "yes, sir" does not work. Open defiance appears to work, at least where I live.

And that might work where you live. We had a small bar/restaurant here, family run, since I was a kid. They kept defying the ban. They were fined so many times, they ended up going out of business. I really felt bad for them....but they took their stand. So be it. But that doesn't work out favorably for everyone.

Lu
 

TheEmperorOfIceCream

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 1, 2008
1,092
8
62
London, UK
Just returned from our friend's bar. We live in a smoking ban state, BUT many locally owned bars stopped following the smoking ban about six weeks after it started being enforced two years ago. They were going out of business and decided the defiance was worth it. I always smoke real cigs there in appreciation of their stand against ban tyranny. Tonight, there were about 12 people there....9 of them were smokers. The three non-smokers simply did not care. This bar has had two reports and no fines in over two years. Hiding in the shadows and saying "yes, sir" does not work. Open defiance appears to work, at least where I live.

Here in the UK pubs are falling like leaves in Valombrossa. Slightly off-topic, but what kept them open was those of us with human failings. I used to scoff up beer and fags in Homeric quantities. The loyal opposition to life-easing anodynes were always banging on about how they'd practically live in pubs if only they could cut their way through the fug to the bar.

We swallowed it HL&S. And the pubs are as empty as a hermit's address book...

Emp
 

TheEmperorOfIceCream

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 1, 2008
1,092
8
62
London, UK
Hi Pete,

Somewhere up the line Lu posted about not vaping in a library. I got all arsey about her use of the term flaunting but I think in retrospect I should have made a more obvious point, ie who would smoke or vape in a library?

@Lu

I don't seem to be having much luck posting to / about you, Lu. The above should have said 'who would smoke or vape openly in a library?'

Emp
 

sherid

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 25, 2008
2,266
493
USA
Here in the UK pubs are falling like leaves in Valombrossa. Slightly off-topic, but what kept them open was those of us with human failings. I used to scoff up beer and fags in Homeric quantities. The loyal opposition to life-easing anodynes were always banging on about how they'd practically live in pubs if only they could cut their way through the fug to the bar.

We swallowed it HL&S. And the pubs are as empty as a hermit's address book...

Emp

I have read much about the UK smoking ban and find it appalling that it has destroyed your pub culture and seems to have overtaken your government. I believe that in certain parts of the US we are headed in the same direction: CA, NY, Boston, to name a few. I live in a small town where people do not easily accept such controls. I have no idea how long that will last, but if we do not fight back with everything we have; we will be in the same position. Bars in cities follow the ban. Bars in small towns here have the advantage of being spread out and difficult for the HD to enforce. Another friend of ours owns a bar that continues to allow smoking. A health department official visited recently for a routine inspection. When she came in, several people were smoking. The HD official continued her inspection, and when she left, she declared no violations. Many people in my area are totally against the ban, apparently even some within the health department. Funny story...even the local health department got a smoking violation. Pure and utter nonsense.
 

sherid

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 25, 2008
2,266
493
USA
And that might work where you live. We had a small bar/restaurant here, family run, since I was a kid. They kept defying the ban. They were fined so many times, they ended up going out of business. I really felt bad for them....but they took their stand. So be it. But that doesn't work out favorably for everyone.

Lu

I would rather go out as they did than fail slowly as I gave up what I believed in.
 

ZambucaLu

ECF Guru
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 23, 2008
10,262
22
Central NY, USA
I would rather go out as they did than fail slowly as I gave up what I believed in.

The ban started here in 2003 (pretty sure that was the year). The bar owners had to make choices....keep allowing smoking and eventually go broke on fines (as that one owner did)....or "follow the rules" and stay in business...or whatever was left of it. Once they were targeted, they were constantly checked.

It was quite shocking (and sad) to see these businesses decline and lose so many customers....people just stopped going out. I guess each person has to make a choice on what they are willing to give up to stand by their beliefs. For some owners, this was their livelihood....so I guess they chose to follow the rules and stay in business. In any event, I wouldn't fault them either way.

Lu
 

Oldnamenomore

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 1, 2009
304
0
VP I am not a smoker any more I do not smoke I don't use tobacco products anymore why the should I pretend like I am. Its not illegal for me to do it where ever I want. if the person in charge of that place told me not to do it there I will respect their place and not do it. I have read all your posts and you are a idiot, WE ARE NOT SMOKERS so we shouldn't follow SMOKING LAWS.

edit: removed 7 f-bombs
 
Last edited:

Kimpetuous

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 22, 2009
180
21
57
Dever
yeah i have had this problem too. They are worried that people think you are smoking an actual cigarette and they will light up in the bar too. They are definitely not illegal. He is just incompetent.


"How come Andrew gets to get up? If he gets up, we'll all get up, IT'LL BE ANARCHY!" ---Breakfast Club
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread