Deeming Regulations have been released!!!!

BillW50

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 23, 2014
3,429
34,412
US
It seems the "on the market" date is still in force for PMTA applications, so those products that came on the market after 8/8/16 don't qualify for PMTA or any extensions, right? Only "substantial equivalence" to approved products at some future date would apply if I recall correctly.

Any product after 8/8/2016 can't be sold period without a prior PMTA approval (which to date, nothing after 8/8/2016 has been). Prior products can be sold today and must submit a PMTA by the 9th.
 

Territoo

Diva
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
  • Jul 17, 2009
    7,703
    37,993
    Texas
    It seems the "on the market" date is still in force for PMTA applications, so those products that came on the market after 8/8/16 don't qualify for PMTA or any extensions, right? Only "substantial equivalence" to approved products at some future date would apply if I recall correctly.

    Actually all US products came onto market in 2016. That's when the first US patent for Ruyan was released. So every product may apply for PMTA, with no guarantee of approval. While waiting for approval, the product may be continued to be marketed until either the application is rejected, or one year later, if the PMTA is failed to be granted. Although it sounds like it could take longer than a year. If after a year, the PMTA is accepted, the product may be sold indefinitely.
     
    • Informative
    Reactions: MLEJ

    BillW50

    Vaping Master
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Nov 23, 2014
    3,429
    34,412
    US
    Actually all US products came onto market in 2016. That's when the first US patent for Ruyan was released

    Umm... patents protects the owner from others selling clones. And having a patent means nothing to the FDA's PMTA. All the FDA cares about is when it was first marketed and if a PMTA was filed.
     

    Territoo

    Diva
    Supporting Member
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
  • Jul 17, 2009
    7,703
    37,993
    Texas
    Umm... patents protects the owner from others selling clones. And having a patent means nothing to the FDA's PMTA. All the FDA cares about is when it was first marketed and if a PMTA

    I was wrong on the patent, 2006, not 2016, and the deeming grandfather clause reaches back that far. I mentioned the patent because there are no pre2006 products available for us to fall back on.
     
    • Informative
    Reactions: mikepetro

    Seiggy

    Super Member
    ECF Veteran
    Feb 1, 2012
    343
    1,564
    Irwin, Pennsylvania
    ECBlend has some good information on where they stand with the PMTA. "About & FAQ's" is where to look. Seems they have submitted over 100 eliquids, talks about status, pricing, lists of what was submitted and what is discontinued (or going to be). Some more information.
     

    Katya

    ECF Guru
    Supporting Member
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Feb 23, 2010
    34,804
    120,147
    SoCal
    That is one of the Best Things I have ever heard Mitch Zeller say.

    The best thing Zeller has ever said is this:

    "If we could get all of those people [who can't or won’t quit smoking conventional cigarettes] to completely switch all of their cigarettes to the non-combustible products that would be good for public health."

    "It is not the nicotine that kills half of all long-term cigarette smokers. The nicotine creates and sustains the addictions, but it's not the nicotine that kills people."

    I start every letter to legislators with this quote. Never did us any good. :lol:
     

    Katya

    ECF Guru
    Supporting Member
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Feb 23, 2010
    34,804
    120,147
    SoCal
    Any product after 8/8/2016 can't be sold period without a prior PMTA approval (which to date, nothing after 8/8/2016 has been). Prior products can be sold today and must submit a PMTA by the 9th.

    That reminds me--I need to buy a few more things. :facepalm:

    BBL. :lol:
     

    BillW50

    Vaping Master
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Nov 23, 2014
    3,429
    34,412
    US
    I mentioned the patent just to indicate that there are no pre2016 products that we can fall back on.

    Sure we can. There are lots of pre 8/8/2016 products still being sold. The DNA60 Billet Box is a huge example. Then there are many others things like from Aspire, like Nautilus, Atlantis, Triton, etc. still being sold. Kanger Subtank OCC coils are still common. I am not up on Smok stuff, but I am sure they still sell a few. Same I bet for iJoy, Joyetech, and for many others. Heck fasttech even still sells the Vamo v2.
     

    Katya

    ECF Guru
    Supporting Member
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Feb 23, 2010
    34,804
    120,147
    SoCal
    Sure we can. There are lots of pre 8/8/2016 products still being sold. The DNA60 Billet Box is a huge example. Then there are many others things like from Aspire, like Nautilus, Atlantis, Triton, etc. still being sold. Kanger Subtank OCC coils are still common. I am not up on Smok stuff, but I am sure they still sell a few. Same I bet for iJoy, Joyetech, and for many others. Heck Fasttech even still sells the Vamo v2.

    Unfortunately, everything I use now is post-2016. I have tons of older gear in my Vapocalypse box, but not in use any more. Not going back to Vision Spinners with T3 clearomizers. :facepalm:
     

    CMD-Ky

    Highly Esteemed Member
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Sep 15, 2013
    5,321
    42,395
    KY
    Funny? Yes, it is. True, that, too, is true. Sad, the corruption of the government is astounding in its audacity, its breadth and its depth.

    Well knowing how much Big Tobacco and the Government hates vaping, I fully expect the FDA will be mailing millions of Refusal to Accept (RTA) letters on Monday, September 10. My understanding is the FDA doesn't have to state the reason for the refusal. Of course there will be lawsuits, but the Government will get the taxpayers to pay for it all anyway. And then drag it out until the e-cig community is bankrupted. :(

    Then we enter into the new post September 10th era.

    View attachment 904749
     

    BillW50

    Vaping Master
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Nov 23, 2014
    3,429
    34,412
    US
    Unfortunately, everything I use now is post-2016. I have tons of older gear in my Vapocalypse box, but not in use any more. Not going back to Vision Spinners with T3 clearomizers. :facepalm:

    Well the great thing is the PMTA doesn't affect what you own, so we're safe there. It also doesn't affect sales outside of America. So purchasing outside of the US should continue to be without a problem. But it is a huge burden on sales within the country. :(
     

    UncLeJunkLe

    ECF Guru
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Nov 29, 2010
    10,626
    2
    28,683
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    Sure we can. There are lots of pre 8/8/2016 products still being sold. The DNA60 Billet Box is a huge example. Then there are many others things like from Aspire, like Nautilus, Atlantis, Triton, etc. still being sold. Kanger Subtank OCC coils are still common. I am not up on Smok stuff, but I am sure they still sell a few. Same I bet for iJoy, Joyetech, and for many others. Heck Fasttech even still sells the Vamo v2.

    I'm confused.

    Last I checked a few days ago the grandfather date for PMTA is Feb 15, 2007, not Aug 8, 2016. If the 2007 grandfather date has not changed, that means that virtually every product out on the market today, including 510 and 808 cigalikes and eGo batteries and their tanks/cartomizers all need a PMTA to remain on the market. This would even include CE series clearomizers.

    Please correct me if this has been updated because if anything on the US market before 8-8-2016 is allowed to be sold without PMTA then that changes the level of doom I would feel about PMTA and deeming.
     

    Territoo

    Diva
    Supporting Member
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
  • Jul 17, 2009
    7,703
    37,993
    Texas
    I'm confused.

    Last I checked a few days ago the grandfather date for PMTA is Feb 15, 2007, not Aug 8, 2016. If the 2007 grandfather date has not changed, that means that virtually every product out on the market today, including 510 and 808 cigalikes and eGo batteries and their tanks/cartomizers all need a PMTA to remain on the market. This would even include CE series clearomizers.

    Please prove me wrong because if anything on the US market before 8-8-2016 is allowed to be sold without PMTA then that changes the level of doom I would feel about PMTA and deeming.
    You are right. I typed pre2016 when I meant pre2006. There wont be any resurrection of old technology to save us.
     

    puffon

    Vaping Master
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
  • Sep 18, 2014
    5,928
    15,765
    Florida
    I'm confused.

    Last I checked a few days ago the grandfather date for PMTA is Feb 15, 2007, not Aug 8, 2016. If the 2007 grandfather date has not changed, that means that virtually every product out on the market today, including 510 and 808 cigalikes and eGo batteries and their tanks/cartomizers all need a PMTA to remain on the market. This would even include CE series clearomizers.

    Please correct me if this has been updated because if anything on the US market before 8-8-2016 is allowed to be sold without PMTA then that changes the level of doom I would feel about PMTA and deeming.
    You are correct. The "grandfather" date is 2/15/07.
    Deeming rules took effect 8/8/2016
    The Deeming Rule: A Brief History and Timeline of the FDA’s Vaping Regulations - Vaping360
     

    BillW50

    Vaping Master
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Nov 23, 2014
    3,429
    34,412
    US
    I'm confused.

    Last I checked a few days ago the grandfather date for PMTA is Feb 15, 2007, not Aug 8, 2016. If the 2007 grandfather date has not changed, that means that virtually every product out on the market today, including 510 and 808 cigalikes and eGo batteries and their tanks/cartomizers all need a PMTA to remain on the market. This would even include CE series clearomizers.

    Please correct me if this has been updated because if anything on the US market before 8-8-2016 is allowed to be sold without PMTA then that changes the level of doom I would feel about PMTA and deeming.

    No, no! The grandfather date of Feb 15, 2007 is very real and is something else completely. Anything prior to this date is exempt from the PMTA completely.

    And anything marketed between Feb 15, 2007 through Aug 8, 2016 can still be sold legally and must file a PMTA by Sep 9, 2020. Anything marketed after Aug 8, 2016 can't be sold legally until a PMTA is filed and approved. Which basically means everything marketed after Aug 8, 2016 and sold in the country is illegal. Because nothing has been approved yet except iQOS and snus.
     

    440BB

    Vaping Master
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Apr 19, 2011
    9,227
    34,009
    The Motor City
    After 28,000+ posts and 1400+pages it's easy for the basic deeming dates and rules to get lost in the shuffle.

    Perhaps many got lulled into complacency and forgot that that cool new shiny from last couple years is not among things that can get PMTA approval.

    Depending on the when and how of enforcement, many vapers are in for a big surprise.
     

    Territoo

    Diva
    Supporting Member
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
  • Jul 17, 2009
    7,703
    37,993
    Texas
    No, no! The grandfather date of Feb 15, 2007 is very real and is something else completely. Anything prior to this date is exempt from the PMTA completely.

    And anything marketed between Feb 15, 2007 through Aug 8, 2016 can still be sold legally and must file a PMTA by Sep 9, 2020. Anything marketed after Aug 8, 2016 can't be sold legally until a PMTA is filed and approved. Which basically means everything marketed after Aug 8, 2016 and sold in the country is illegal. Because nothing has been approved yet except iQOS and snus.

    That clears it up. What specific technology came after 2016 are they gunning for?
     

    Users who are viewing this thread