Deeming Regulations have been released!!!!

Lessifer

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 5, 2013
8,309
28,987
Sacramento, California
I thought the Deeming regs were supposed to be repealed by now? :blink:

Isn't that what we were told on another thread?
Maybe they are, but the blackout on agency communications is preventing them from telling us?
 

MacTechVpr

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 24, 2013
5,725
14,412
Hollywood (Beach), FL
It's 12-14$ a pack in the NE I read round here recently. Lot of spread 'tween that and vape prices for the taxman to latch on to. No joy 'till vaping's extracted from tobacco legislation. There's always a pen handy for the man.

G'luck. :)
 

Bronze

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 19, 2012
40,240
188,012
I'll hold off my celebration for something in writing that spells out exactly how vapor products will be handled.
I wont be celebrating anything until the regs are upended. But I will be paying attention to anything said or done that moves in the right direction.
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,675
1
84,918
So-Cal
I'll hold off my celebration for something in writing that spells out exactly how vapor products will be handled.

That would be a Good Idea.

And I think we will have to wait for a New FDA Commissionaire for something like that to Happen.

Barring a Very Favorable Court Ruling that is.
 

Lessifer

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 5, 2013
8,309
28,987
Sacramento, California
That would be a Good Idea.

And I think we will have to wait for a New FDA Commissionaire for something like that to Happen.

Barring a Very Favorable Court Ruling that is.
So... I have a question. With this new "one step forward, two steps back" policy, would the deeming regulations be considered one regulation? Or, is it an amendment to the FSPTCA? Would we only get a repeal if the FDA wants to issue another regulation?

"Simple" policies always sound good, but the devil is in the details, and I don't see any details...
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,675
1
84,918
So-Cal
So... I have a question. With this new "one step forward, two steps back" policy, would the deeming regulations be considered one regulation? Or, is it an amendment to the FSPTCA? Would we only get a repeal if the FDA wants to issue another regulation?

"Simple" policies always sound good, but the devil is in the details, and I don't see any details...

JMO...

But just like Restricting things like Existing Green Cards and Visa's wasn't very thought out, this 2 for 1 scheme Doesn't seem very thought out also.
 

Eskie

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 6, 2016
16,087
77,744
NY
So... I have a question. With this new "one step forward, two steps back" policy, would the deeming regulations be considered one regulation? Or, is it an amendment to the FSPTCA? Would we only get a repeal if the FDA wants to issue another regulation?

"Simple" policies always sound good, but the devil is in the details, and I don't see any details...

They can treat it as a single regulation. Then all they have to do is toss the two regulations, one banning cyanide, and the other strychnine from baby food, which would also eliminate the whole "what about the children?" stuff.

We've got some good news from Indiana at least!!



I wonder what the 3 provisions were?
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,675
1
84,918
So-Cal
They can treat it as a single regulation. Then all they have to do is toss the two regulations, one banning cyanide, and the other strychnine from baby food, which would also eliminate the whole "what about the children?" stuff.

Or they could do the Opposite.

Throw Out 2 Meaningless/Obsolete Regulations so they can Enact a New Regulation. I that case, Nothing has really been Accomplished.

Not sure who is Advising Trump on Regulations?

But it seems that it Isn't so much a Numbers Game. Seems like it is more about Good and Bad Regulations. And 2 Bad's doesn't make 1 Good.
 

Users who are viewing this thread