Will the judge know or discover the bogus nature of these "studies" and other propaganda that this response seems to rely on as its defense though?At first read the filing appears to be no more than tabloid journalism disguised as a legal document.
The FDA's arguments as presented are nothing more than a rehash of the same thoroughly debunked ANTZ propaganda we've been seeing all along. Now the FDA will have to defend their claims under cross examination.
Further, the oh-so-graphically described exploding device injuries reek of desperation.
Fortunately, most judges can see right through this sort of 'If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with BS.' nonsense.
The oral arguments should be very entertaining to say the least.
I need some comfort food...