You can sue over anything.And do you think that market will have mandatory disclosure?
Yeah, I already know your response.
But curious what those who have allergies will do in that market? Or what they have done pre-FDA deeming in current market?
Like I have allergy to pretty popular product that may or may not be in something I will choose to eat today. If it's in there a lot, it'll affect me (could arguably be deadly), and then I'll know not to eat that again. Or I guess I could sue the manufacturer for not proving exact amount on there and causing me to have adverse reaction. I dunno even know if that last sentence makes sense cause I don't understand how people reach that sort of conclusion, but probably makes it easier to conceive of when you see million dollar lawsuits awarded on similar grounds.
You do indirectly raise an interesting point. If it is true that BO is a rare condition (say .5% of population will get it if exposed to high amount of diketones, when inhaled), then I wonder what the 99.5% of the population that wouldn't get the condition are to do if say the substitute is actually worse for them?
And you just made my case for FULL ingredient labeling.
thanks.