This bill:
Prohibits a person from ordering electronic cigarette products by mail, phone, or Internet without a license
So how the hell does Utah keep their people from using the internet? Or does everyone in Utah need an internet license now?
This bill:
Prohibits a person from ordering electronic cigarette products by mail, phone, or Internet without a license
Really, we ought to just extend this reasoning to alcohol, too. There are a couple of bills that seek to raise the legal age for cigarettes to 21, just like with booze. Well, then, if kids aren't old enough to smoke a cig and drink a beer, then they sure as hell aren't old enough to be in the military.
* Learning how to rebuild atomizers. Kanthal and cotton will not be restricted. Lithium-Ion batteries won't be either.
* Putting a substantial stash of 100 mg/ml ("High-Test") nic base in the freezer. A liter is of that is enough to last even a hard-core nicotine addict like me a couple of years. In glass bottles with the air in the head-space displaced with an inert gas like argon, and stored in a dark freezer, it should last pretty much forever. PG and VG won't be restricted. Food flavorings won't be either.
If you wait until then, you'll pay through the nose during that window. Just look at what happened with guns and ammo about one year ago, when the politicians were posturing about new restrictions.
In Boston, MA, we're prohibited to vape in any smoke-free venue (meaning, we can't even vape in a bar) and are regulating e-cig sales in gas stations and smoke shops. I haven't heard anything about banning online sales, but how would a state even go about that?
Likely the same way gun vendors can't sell 30 round magazines to folks your state (and others). The vendors will straight out be prohibited from shipping them into your state. But first, they'll have to be outright banned in your state (the vape equipment).
Lol, whaaaat? An e-cig is not even anywhere as close to deadly or harmful as a gun or ammunition. They can suck my non-existant. I am sorry for people who live in states who might ban online buying.
Lol, whaaaat? An e-cig is not even anywhere as close to deadly or harmful as a gun or ammunition. They can suck my non-existant. I am sorry for people who live in states who might ban online buying.
Well it's both and neither to an extent.
It's the rebellion to the anti-smoke group think. On both 'conservative' (pot view) and 'liberal' (Nic=cancer) thete views.
Unfortunatley I don't see any solutions. Even if we bend over there's not a lot that will stop the legislatsorous
How so? I believe what keeps "Gun Vendors" from shipping magazines to states like California is a fear of losing their FFL (Federal Firearms License) because losing it would effectively put them out of business. But I don't think there's anything that prohibits a private individual in a free state from sending (for example) a 30-round magazine to someone in California, where that magazine is illegal. A magazine is not a gun and is not regulated by the feds. California can arrest the recipient for being in possession of that magazine, but as long as the sender doesn't set foot in California, there's not a bloody thing California can do to him for sending it.Likely the same way gun vendors can't sell 30 round magazines to folks your state (and others). The vendors will straight out be prohibited from shipping them into your state.
I swear our government officials first see what will generate income (Huge taxes on luxury goods) then pick a side without much research... Then it's jump in front of a camera or a mic and push push push their agenda...