You wouldn't want to have a constant stirring with the lid off. You'd get too much oxidation.
I don't think the "hide the liquid from light" is what you guys think. UV light typically breaks down chemicals, like direct sunlight. I might be wrong about that, but I have had medication come in the mail before and then gotten another batch of the same medication because the manufacturer said mine had been left in direct sunlight and the UV light in sunlight breaks down the active ingredients. I doubt that the light coming from any typical light bulb would have any effect on e liquid.
As for the nicotine being part of the final mix and that I should have that mixed while steeping, I think you may be right about that. I will need to do some research into nicotine (as well as the other ingredients) and find at what temperatures they break down. I need to learn about nicotine oxidation. I suspect that heated steeping will lessen the flavor potency, but I am just assuming that because I prefer to assume the worst and be pleasantly surprised when I'm wrong. Another reason I didn't add the nicotine is that I've not worked out a flavor level I like yet and I don't want to waste nicotine if I screw it up.
When I said "evaporate" I meant break down. I have a few motors that I may repurpose to constantly stir the liquid as it is being heated. Any pc fan could do that with only slight modifications.
If you want to do this Right. Why don't you buy one of those Nicotine Testers so you can Know Exactly what Nicotine you have and what you End Up with.
I wasn't going to leave the cap off to stir it. Just drill a small hole which I might get a grommet for and put the fans pin through it. It would be air tight, but not able to remain air tight under any kind of pressure. But I don't think that would be an issue. Just an idea.
Yeah I know I sound like I'm over thinking all this stuff, but really can you over think anything? Really? lol No, I'm doing the slow steep in the closet as well. I just like to test multiple variables so as to get a clearer picture of what is really going on. I an ofc a noob, but I don't stay a noob at anything I'm interested in for long. That didn't sound at all arrogant or egotistical. =) I got nothing but time on my hands and have a love for science and logic.
I see a lot of ppl just parroting things they've heard others say, and they don't give me the impression that they know for a fact what they are saying is true. I think this is to be expected in such a young enterprise. People tend to make up their own facts when there aren't any actual facts to be found easily. NOT talking about anyone in here. Mostly ppl I've seen on youtube and some of the common ideas like, keep ur ejuice out of light stuff. I'm almost positive that got started by someone saying it once but meaning direct sunlight, and everyone just latched on to it and now you have to hide ur juice in the cellar. I might be wrong on that. I just know that the light emitted from light bulbs doesn't have the power to initiate any meaningful chemical change. (I said "know", but I don't actually know that to be a fact either. Just an educated guess)
Thanks a lot dannyv45 for the links. I will for sure be reading those. Oh I did see a redit post where a guy heat steeped some ejuice with nicotine in it then sent it off to a lab to be tested and it had only reduced in nicotine content by .1%, so that does seem to support the previous statement that the loss of nicotine would be very small.
I have nothing to compare my heat steeping method to at the moment, but I'm going to keep doing it as it seems highly likely that it would work. Be on the look out for my OOPS I F'd UP thread. lol
I did that! No change in nic level at 170 or less in a 4 hour crock pot heating. Didn't test higher temps than that.
I know you mentioned that you were not referencing people who have commented here, but yes, it's happens often. It's easy to take an idea from someone and turn into pseudo-factual. With that said, quite a few people have done nic degradation testing, including myself, and I don't take anything on here as factual data until I have done the research and tested the methods.
...
Observation: The traits of people are interesting or disturbing (however you look at it) as they will argue/defend/promote whatever they perceive to be factual and 99.9% of the time it is pure hearsay. People by nature are very gullible, they read and believe and go about spreading hearsay in such a manner as to give the impression that they are an authority on the subject...gullibility morphs into vainness.
Steeping: Things that seem monumental to some are insignificant to others. Some folks just love to tinker doing things, testing...there's nothing wrong with this in/of itself, if that's what they like to do...personally it would be bordering on an obsessive-compulsive disorder if I felt it neccessary to heat steep my juice at 149.975 degree for 4hrs, 3minutes and 46seconds vs 152.575 degree for 4hrs, 9minutes and 15seconds because my nicotine degraded 1.16699 % using the ladder method.
Now, don't no one go and get all offended because I'm perfectly satisfied with the majority of my fresh mixes. I just don't find the minuscule differences that ascertainable.
On The Lighter Side: Steeper's Anonymous Is Here To Help...Your Personal Information Is Kept Private and Confidential.