I've had the recent experience of being able to see max watts and max temp after each puff. Depending on coil saturation my rda produces useful amounts of vapor at much lower coil temperatures than I would have predicted. I have gotten vapor comparable to my Nautilus mini at an indicated coil temperature of 210 F, far far below 470 F. I'm using 3 watts to get a saturated coil to 210 F and getting okay vapor. It's cool and tootle puffer amounts but vapable. The results i'm getting aren't going to be common knowledge. Who is playing with this? There could be more people besides me exlporing low temperature vaping to see what's repeatable. My hunch is tootle puffers are vaping at reletively low temps, lower than they might guess. I got out my Nautilus mini for the first time in 2 years last week. I'd forgotten it's a pleasant experience. I going to learn how to duplcate that with my rda so I can take a lot of puffs on inactive off days without the irritation of hotter denser vapor.And it is that very temperature that we're all wondering about of can you get enough of a vape at a temperature low enough to not cause thermal breakdown. That means replicating the temperatures the Wang study appears to find results in thermal degradation and see if they match up to what we can accomplish with a temp controlled board, as well as the question of can you translate this into wattage mode for folks not using temp control. If it holds up that 400F as measured and controlled by current generation boards that there is no thermal breakdown but there is at 500F, then we have a basis for arguing 400F (or 450F or whatever it turns out to be) is "better for you".
The final step, which I think is extremely important, is will a vape at a safe temp be satisfying? If it's not, we've got a problem.