Got that earlier today, but been mostly off the 'puter. But, I did email them all this:
I am writing as a voter and taxpaying Washintonian to express extreme
concern and opposition to HB 1645. This bill would severely limit
adult access to low-risk, smoke-free vapor products that are helping
millions of former smokers like me maintain a safe distance from
combustible cigarettes. Such an extreme price hike imposed on
products that help people quit smoking simply makes no sense. Although
I agree with the states desire to limit access to these products to
minors, this bill will limit adult access and, in fact, put myself and
others at risk of returning to smoking. Rather than endangering the
lives of adults that have made a conscious choice to improve their
health, the state should enforce the existing law that prohibits sales
of vapor products to minors.
Vapor products contain NO tobacco and are significantly LESS harmful
than smoking tobacco. MY health has improved since I made the switch,
MY doctor and MY dentist have both remarked on it. Taxing it out of
viable reach as a HARM REDUCTION method makes absolutely no sense.
Simply stated, vapor products should not be treated the same as
traditional combustible cigarettes. While nicotine may be what causes
many smokers to continue to smoke, nicotine use in and of itself is
not particularly hazardous. Rather, it is smoking -- lighting
something on fire and inhaling the products of combustion -- that
causes the whole host of very serious health problems associated with
smoking. E-cigarettes do not involve combustion and are estimated to
be 99% less hazardous than smoking.
Ostensibly, taxes on traditional cigarettes are intended to discourage
use and offset expenses incurred by taxpayers due to health problems
attributed to smoking. However, due to the fact that e-cigarettes
have not been shown to be a threat to public health (and, in fact, are
a health boon to those who have made the switch or who have reduced
their smoking using e-cigarettes), discouraging use is counter to
goals of reducing smoking rates. Taxing e-cigarettes in a manner
similar to how cigarettes are taxed sends a confusing and inaccurate
message to would be adopters that these two very different products
present similar risks. The result of this message is that more
people, those that otherwise would have switched to a smoke free
product, will be encouraged to continue smoking -- 1.1 million
Washington residents will actually be encouraged to continue smoking
instead of making the switch to low-risk product like e-cigarettes.
HB 1645 creates unnecessary, complicated, and expensive hurdles for
businesses (onerous requirements regarding licensing, shipping, etc.).
This is not only bad for businesses, its bad for consumers. These
requirements will dramatically increase costs, force many (if not
most) businesses to close, and severely limit my access to the
products I rely upon to remain smoke-free.
Banning internet sales appears to be an infringement of my rights to
interstate commerce.
Banning all components (Section 15) includes, among many other common
items, the screws that hold vaping devices together. So are Home Depot
and McLendon's going to have to get waivers? Flashlights were used to
build some early vaping devices. Are they to be illegal to buy on the
internet?
I look forward to your response on this issue. I, along with my fellow
members of CASAA (Consumer Advocates for Smoke-free Alternatives
Association), thank you for considering my comments and hope you will
oppose misguided attempts to limit adult use of smoke-free
e-cigarettes. Please keep me informed of the progress of these bills
as they move through the legislative process and feel free to contact
me with any questions you might have regarding this issue.
(Feel free to use, cut and paste, etc

)
Only one reply - from my State Senator's office:
David,
Thank you for taking the time to share your concerns about HB 1645. We can appreciate your perspective and have printed out your email for Senator Becker to read. This bill has not had any action in the Senate. However, that could change at any time.
This has been a widely discussed issue here in Olympia and across the state. Senator Becker has not favored taxes in the past, and will be paying close attention to these bills as the session comes to a close this month.
Thank you for your input and your involvement.
Best regards,
Stephanie DeHart - Session Aide to
Washington State Senator Randi Becker
Keep writing and calling!