Thank you voltaire, not sure why those didn't come up in my searches. Sorry for the OT.
Not trying to be outright mean here, but ehow is not a reputable source of information.
QUOTE]
Since ehow is not a reputable source of info (really I dont mean for that to sound snarky)...
Here are some other resources that might prove helpful
Time:
Medicine: Air Germicide - TIME
Journal of pharmacology:
TESTS FOR THE CHRONIC TOXICITY OF PROPYLEXE GLYCOL AND TRIETHYLENE GLYCOL ON MONKEYS AND RATS BY VAPOR INHALATION AND ORAL ADMINISTRATION ? JPET
British Medical Journal- occupational and enviromental medicine (have to sign up for free)
Sign In
CDC - Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry
Ethylene Glycol and Propylene Glycol Toxicity: What is Propylene Glycol | ATSDR - Environmental Medicine & Environmental Health Education - CSEM
Hopefully these are more reputable resources for you..I know that based on these and the lack of any real substantial research in VG ..that for me, my preference is for PG..
EDIT:
oh and one more reference:
NASA - published by the National Academies Press
http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12529&page=314
I was wondering if any diabetics have had problems with their blood sugar levels with using either PG or VG. The info I have found is that both are converted into glucose in the body. I am a type 2 diabetic and I am not on medication, trying to control it naturally (one of the reasons I want to stop smoking analogs! ) anyway I searched for about an hour now and can't find anyone discussing this, so was wondering if there are any other diabetics vaping? I saw one lady say she was a type 1?
Not trying to be outright mean here, but ehow is not a reputable source of information.
QUOTE]
Since ehow is not a reputable source of info (really I dont mean for that to sound snarky)...
Here are some other resources that might prove helpful
Time:
Medicine: Air Germicide - TIME
Journal of pharmacology:
TESTS FOR THE CHRONIC TOXICITY OF PROPYLEXE GLYCOL AND TRIETHYLENE GLYCOL ON MONKEYS AND RATS BY VAPOR INHALATION AND ORAL ADMINISTRATION ? JPET
British Medical Journal- occupational and enviromental medicine (have to sign up for free)
Sign In
CDC - Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry
Ethylene Glycol and Propylene Glycol Toxicity: What is Propylene Glycol | ATSDR - Environmental Medicine & Environmental Health Education - CSEM
Hopefully these are more reputable resources for you..I know that based on these and the lack of any real substantial research in VG ..that for me, my preference is for PG..
EDIT:
oh and one more reference:
NASA - published by the National Academies Press
Spacecraft Maximum Allowable Concentrations for Selected Airborne Contaminants: Volume 5
its not snarky,
what you posted are reputable sources.......
ehow, still is not.... whether what was stated ends up being correct or not.
V4Lis4me, I don't want to sound like too much of an ... here, but we're only consuming a very small amount.those are very small quantities....
vaping entails a direct consumption of the pure product.
I don't even think that that much is actually being deposited to our lungs internally..this was taken from the NASA research:V4Lis4me, I don't want to sound like too much of an ... here, but we're only consuming a very small amount.
First, consider your daily intake. How many mLs are you consuming? I personally vape 2-3mLs daily.
Secondly, consider how much of those 2-3mLs are actually being deposited internally. I'm not sure of the percentage, but if you're blowing out vapor it's not all of it. For these purposes, lets say 50% is being deposited. We are now at 1-1.5mLs/day.
Third, we have to ignore the amount vapor deposited in the mouth, as that will likely be mixed with saliva and swallowed(a known safe route:reference). Again, this amount is a total guess, but 25% of the remainder sounds fair(I know I'm doing this backwards, mouth deposition would be before exhaling). We're now looking at .75-1.125mLs/day.
At this low of a level, I wouldn't perceive any major health effects, apart from people who may be sensitive to PG. The NIH seems to agree based on a preclinical test of inhaled cyclosporine in PG. You might be better served putting more thought into the flavorings used, or even the nicotine, which is proven to be highly toxic.
* Propylene glycol is used in various foods, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical products.
* Propylene glycol toxicity is not expected in normal environmental or occupational exposures.
* Propylene glycol toxicity is metabolized to compounds that are normal constituents of the citric acid cycle.
* Large doses and unusual circumstances are necessary for the development of propylene glycol toxicity.
...[Then] the researchers found that the propylene glycol itself was a potent germicide. One part of glycol in 2,000,000 parts of air would—within a few seconds—kill concentrations of air-suspended pneumococci, streptococci and other bacteria numbering millions to the cubic foot.
I exercise now (I didn't when I was smoking).
I'm losing weight and feeling fit. I even climb the stairs at work instead of using the elevator.
I lost my chronic cough (of 22 years) within 2 weeks of vaping.
I haven't been sick since I started vaping and stopped smoking.
I no longer stink of smoke.
I'm eating healthier, I feel much much healthier.
In the right amount, water can kill you.
Same with Oxygen.
I also agree there should be tests on prolonged use of eliquids and ecigs. I don't think you'll find anyone that disagrees with that.
And, brother, I can GUARANTEE the FDA is/has been testing. They WANT to ban ecigs. In a really really bad way. I'm sure their pockets are lined by tobacco and we all know they are funded by the government. All three of these groups have made nothing but negative remarks concerning ecigs and yet can't produce a single shred of evidence that even comes remotely close to the facts concerning the effects of cigarettes on the human body.
OK,
because I was aware where this post would head, I must play devil's advocate.....
I will cite this finding:
Nature Clinical Practice Nephrology | Acute kidney injury, hyperosmolality and metabolic acidosis associated with lorazepam | Article
please read the whole article for the complete information.
last June Dr. Robertson began studying the effect of glycol vapor on monkeys imported from the University of Puerto Rico's School of Tropical Medicine. So far, after many months' exposure to the vapor, the monkeys are happy and fatter than ever. Dr. Robertson does not expect mankind to live, like his monkeys, continuously in an atmosphere of glycol vapor; but it should be most valuable in such crowded places as schools and theaters, where most respiratory diseases are picked up.
I think many people get upset for the same reasons I stated - we were SMOKING before. We were exposing ourselves to thousands of toxins and hundreds of carcinogens in high levels. It seems ridiculously demanding to expect ecigs to not only be 4,000 times less toxic than tobacco smoke, but to also be 100% safe. There is no such thing, not even in FDA-approved medications. There will always be side effects of putting anything foriegn in the human body, some people will experience worse rather than better.
If anything is a legitimate concern, it's the flavorings - THOSE are the great unkown. But whatever the risk, it's still a hell of a lot less than smoking tobacco.