Thanks, guys. I'm really trying to simplify the science for those without interest or aptitude.
I spent some time in Steam Engine with what seems to be a common coil build across multiple wire types (keeping KA1 for reference).
26awg (0.405mm), 8 wrap @ 2.5mm∅, 0.5mm spacing - this geometry provides a heat flux of 8.88/watt, regardless of wire type. As Heat Flux is geometry dependent, we generally should be building our coils for geometry.
Wire Type / Ω / Heat Capacity / TC Precision
Sorry. Forum software doesn't retain formatting...
KA1 / 0.996 / 37.24 / 2
SS 316 / 0.530 / 45.61 / 466
SS 430 / 0.412 / 40.59 / 569
Ti - Gr1 / 0.323 / 26.42 / 1182
Ni200 / 0.066 / 46.22 / 396
NiFe30 (Resistherm) / 0.227 / 42.07 / 725
Nifethal 52 (NiFe 48) / 0.254 / 46.75 / 1026
On paper, Grade 1 Titanium seems to be the winner across all metrics, with resistance just about median/average. It's handling, oxidation and corrosion characteristics may mitigate the above numbers for many vapers, however. The other wires are simply trading off resistance for higher TC precision. This may be important in multi-coil builds, etc.
As TheBloke pointed out much earlier in the thread, Ni200 seems to be our worst choice for TC vaping across the board. It still may be a good choice for single-coil builds with straight 30awg wire, from purely a TC perspective.
Given identical geometries, all builds should show the same relationships as the above chart, in regards to different wire type. It seems up to us to choose the appropriate wire for our targeted geometries.
How the Heat Capacity effects ramp time is unknown to me. I understand that the lower the Heat Capacity, the lower the ramp-up/cool down. However, does twice the Heat Capacity simply double the ramp-up or is the scale logarithmic, etc?
Am I missing anything here?
I spent some time in Steam Engine with what seems to be a common coil build across multiple wire types (keeping KA1 for reference).
26awg (0.405mm), 8 wrap @ 2.5mm∅, 0.5mm spacing - this geometry provides a heat flux of 8.88/watt, regardless of wire type. As Heat Flux is geometry dependent, we generally should be building our coils for geometry.
Wire Type / Ω / Heat Capacity / TC Precision
Sorry. Forum software doesn't retain formatting...
KA1 / 0.996 / 37.24 / 2
SS 316 / 0.530 / 45.61 / 466
SS 430 / 0.412 / 40.59 / 569
Ti - Gr1 / 0.323 / 26.42 / 1182
Ni200 / 0.066 / 46.22 / 396
NiFe30 (Resistherm) / 0.227 / 42.07 / 725
Nifethal 52 (NiFe 48) / 0.254 / 46.75 / 1026
On paper, Grade 1 Titanium seems to be the winner across all metrics, with resistance just about median/average. It's handling, oxidation and corrosion characteristics may mitigate the above numbers for many vapers, however. The other wires are simply trading off resistance for higher TC precision. This may be important in multi-coil builds, etc.
As TheBloke pointed out much earlier in the thread, Ni200 seems to be our worst choice for TC vaping across the board. It still may be a good choice for single-coil builds with straight 30awg wire, from purely a TC perspective.
Given identical geometries, all builds should show the same relationships as the above chart, in regards to different wire type. It seems up to us to choose the appropriate wire for our targeted geometries.
How the Heat Capacity effects ramp time is unknown to me. I understand that the lower the Heat Capacity, the lower the ramp-up/cool down. However, does twice the Heat Capacity simply double the ramp-up or is the scale logarithmic, etc?
Am I missing anything here?