Yeah, that was your single mistake!
Such a shame....
Garbled OP nobody could follow:
$5.
Endless stream of rationalizations:
$8.
Two-bit psychotherapy:
$1.75.
Failure to own a confusing, poorly-worded, clumsy OP, and the torturous pretzel-logic required to maintain the writer's self-righteous superiority:
Priceless!
Roaring thunderously via Tapatalk...
Let's go over your post, shall we? At least one person actually bothered to read my post and get it. Perhaps I failed to communicate to the target audience at large effectively. Your average newspaper is targeted at a 3rd to 5th grade reading level, and military technical publications are targeted at a 7th. A remarkable number of people still misunderstand both of those, so my expectations of much better here were probably very unrealistic.
Now, do you deny that provari owners take a lot of abuse? Do you think said abuse is justified? Do you think systematic abuse lacks impact on it's target?
Unlike my position of not expecting anyone to provide detailed explanations/justification for their position... I have had to incessantly reiterate and paraphrase to correct misconceptions brought on by either a lack of reading comprehension, or intellectual laziness/failure to actually read all that is being commented on.
What is torturous, is all of the resultant bs... From merely asking if threads that were designed to provoke provari owners, and as a result made happy provari owners come out of the woodwork to say they are great had a positive impact on their (provari owners) choice to purchase a provari.
It's really a pretty simple question, down to the point of being truly binary. It either influenced you to do it, or not.
The ensuing debacle was not anticipated, or desired.