My apologies for how long this post is, but some irl got in the way... Well that and I had to sift though about 20 pages of posts that included geese?!?!?!
I stated pretty much from the beginning that my interest is not about the provari itself, but rather why there is such controversy over a battery tube. As long as people are satisfied that bought it, awesome. I'm more intrigued as to why some many people feel the need to poke provari owners with a stick.
I simply had a moment of curiousity, and thought it worthwhile to ask
why people provoke provari owners with such regularity, as it seems to be pretty systematic.
I believe that provari owners are being singled out and provoked. I'm trying to figure out why. Many of the answers I recieved in this thread so far go waaaaay beyond what I asked, which baffles me a bit. I don't need/want/expect justification as to why people buy provaris.
I just want to know how much the bevvy of declaratory positive statements from provari owners in the threads that question the relative value of the device impacted their choice to purchase one.
If only a sigh could adequately be expressed online. I never in this thread, not once, even remotely implied that the provari is not a quality device. That is not what this thread is about. It is about doing a bit of research to see how the treads that do ask you to justify the purchase impact people (and as a result, their purchasing habits). I thought there just might be a practical purpose behind it, since they seem to happen like clockwork.
Then again, it just might be to make people with a chip on their shoulder twitch... Who knows.
Is there any other device that the owners of get poked/prodded/ridiculed with in such an aggressive way, and with such regularity? My sincere apology, if you take it as a desire to provoke anyone.
No need to justify anything to me, I simply asked a question about whether or not threads such as the ones I was describing (and that probably anyone that has been here over a week has seen several times) had any impact on their purchase of the device. Nothing more, nothing less.
Please, do not attempt to say that I said things that I did not or attempt to twist what I did say into something it was not.
I stated multiple times that the relative quality of the device itself is completely irrelevant to this thread. I'm only asking about whether or not threads that provoke provari owners influenced others to become provari owners.
Ignoring what is right before your eyes, in this very thread mind you, is beyond simple naivete and trods into the realm of intellectual dishonesty and/or willful ignorance.
Look at what has happened here.
I stated in very plain English, from the inception of this thread, that this thread has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not the provari is a quality device.
Look at how many declarations I have recieved already about just how awesome it is.
I don't care if it slices, dices, hovers in front of its respective owner and automatically depresses the power button for you by proxy via psychic link (you gotta admit that would be pretty cool)... I don't care if it will automatically sense the chemical properties of your ejuice, and adjust your wattage to make your vape the precise temperature that you like (you gotta admit, that would be pretty cool, too)...
I wasn't even trying to get anyone to say it rocks, and look how many provari owners came forth to say it is the most inceredible thing in the world to them since the very idea of vaping was presented to them.
Now, do you really think it would be all that hard to get that same group that is oh so sensitive to any form of criticism to not only defend their purchase, but to go to the extreme of saying it is the best thing that ever happened to vaping, with willful intent?
Indeed.
I'm not a member of the Provariat, it didn't seem apropos. Besides, those sub forums (such as the one this thread was moved to) don't get much traffic. How often do you bother to dive into the sub forums, unless you are looking for a specific piece of information?
I left this one intact. Primarily because it is such an impressive body of inane and irrelevant text. It is an amazing example of a strawman argument, though. Either that, or you completelty and utterly misunderstood my opening post in such an epically catastrophic manner... That I can not do justice to its magnitude, and must simply bring it forth again so others can observe it.
Let's be clear on something. I did not imply that you submitted to peer pressure, that is your own inferrence so either man or woman up for it (whichever is apropos, and take responsibility for your own thoughts).
The only way that I rather clearly indicated that I distinctly believe is a possibility for provari owners to be manipulated by, is by the chip on many of their shoulders that could only maybe be eclipsed by some of the larger redwoods available in California's forests (slight hyperbole there, not by much though).
I don't care if it is the most awesome regulated battery holder in the universe. I only am interested in whether or not provari owners were influenced by the threads that critique them, and more specifically all of the provari owners that come out in unison to proclaim its profound greatness (as previously stated, whether it is valid or invalid is irrelevant to this thread).
You complain about the behavior of those that critique the device itself in ignorance, and then critique another who says that you are a victim of their behavior. Unless you find it pleasant, then you would be getting exactly what you wanted (and as a result not a victim).
That is because you are just one of many that failed to either read or comprehend my opening post in this thread. The only factor I inquired about, was the impact of negative threads about the device.
So, just out of curiousity... Did you just not read it, or did you just not understand it? The only reason I am intrigued about the impact of the negative threads, and their impact on purchasing habits... Is that I am curious to see if they could potentially be a motivator to poke provari owners with a stick.
Considering the propensity some have to project intent into others around here, you can't be too careful. Apparently I was not sufficiently foresightful, anyway.
I defy you to find a single instance in this thread where I critiqued the provari itself. Should you find such a thing, please link back to the post (and quote it). Until such time, your entire post is a complete fabrication made of whole cloth and bears not even a striking resemblance to the truth. Go ahead, happy hunting. See if you can make me eat crow.
Well, at least one person that admitted that there was some influence from negative threads about the provari. But, please don't blame me for everyone (including you) that decided to come in here to defend their purchases in detail. I didn't ask for it, didn't want it, and actually find it detracts/distracts from the primary intended focus of the thread.
Fair enough, I could have used clearer punctuation... But, the following does clearly make a request for quantification of people that had their purchasing habits impacted by a specific source of stimuli.
I want you to ask yourself something... How many of you bought your provari about the same time as one of those "why did you trade your firstborn child for a provari" threads. How many bought one after a few provari owners essentially either told someone "buy a provari, you'll eventually do it anyway", "it's no more 'just a battery tube', than a Porsche is just a car" or something else along those lines.
No, that is completely incorrect and was addressed earlier in this rather verbose post. Thanks for trying, though.