Why certain regulations and bans make perfect sense

Status
Not open for further replies.

Claudia P

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 19, 2013
4,137
23,651
Dayton, TN, USA
No your cigalike does not do clouds of vapor, but if there were 10, 15, 20 people all sitting there using their cigalikes it would become clouds of vapor. This is not about one person vaping in an enclosed space, it is about a lot of people vaping in an enclosed space, and if one is allowed to do it the rest will follow. The whole thing is about being considerate of others, and the people with dragon breath are as inconsiderate as the smoker, vaper, cologne bather, etc.

I know you do not even think cigarettes are bad, but I think every smoker at some point in their lives should have to spend quality time with someone who is choking to death in the final stages of lung cancer and realize that cigarettes DO kill many if not most of the people who smoke them over a long period of time and the second hand smoke, while the health problems from same is debatable, does addict the children of parents who smoke around them every day.

I would be interested in hearing how much your opinions change when you are sitting there hacking up a lung in your late 60's if you do indeed live that long.

Unlike.

My cigalike doesn't do clouds of vapor.
Been around enough non-vapers in 2 years of vaping to realize my stuff don't stink / smell. Or stinks in same way person who had food for lunch now has something on their breath that smells. I'm thinking I could make bold claim that says when they enter room, I can smell exactly what they had for lunch, just from their exhaling.

Hmmm, maybe we need to ban public exhaling? Yeah, that's the ticket.
 

Jay-dub

Moved On
Oct 10, 2013
934
1,607
Kansas City, MO
I'm pretty sure we disagree, just not sure how much yet.
:)

I despise the Nanny State, and I'm not sure I'm all that fond of the whole "it takes a village" idea.
But I guess you could consider things like a police force to be "community" or maybe teachers who report suspected child abuse.

There is a line somewhere in there, and I doubt we would draw it in the same place.

Usually, people who despise the nanny state complain that "there ought to be a law against it" when they themselves get burned. I'm more concerned about weeding out the justified claims from the fraud, greed and stupidity. I see what you call the "nanny" state as a result of self-righteous do-gooders who make a lot of noise and get media attention to gain and exercise a disproportionate amount of leverage on the system. Something that, for our hobby/habit's sake, we find a way to temper the system against.:2cool:
 
Last edited:

toddrhodes

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 15, 2012
592
632
45
United States
Sorry, but I believe you are being unfair... nobody said they wanted unlimited freedom... but on the other hand, we surelly do not want unlimited prohibition !! Particularly when that prohibition does not arise from legitimate and proper health concerns, but rather from ideology and economic concerns... revenue above the well-being of real people out there!

If the e-cig ended up banned in Europe, I would not buy my liquid in the black market. Because, of course, then there would be no regulations at all about safety and quality. I would have to start buying the ingredients at pharmacies and such, and start DIY.
I also agree that e-cig, as well as tobacco, should not be sold to minors. See? No 'unlimited freedom' there... BUT, if there are laws already to regulate selling tobacco to minors, and laws to ensure the safety and quality of consumer products, I believe that is enough... there's no health-related need to over-regulate the e-cig! In the EU, it is the second time in just a month and an half that the lobbies have tried a de-facto ban... first, they tried the 'medicalization' route, which failed. Now, they're trying to lump the e-cig with tobacco. As if the two products were equally hazardous.



No, I do not think so. Trouble is, we are discerning adults, who do not want our right to vape be taken away because of supposed concerns about 'child safety'... no refillable atomizers, only sealed, child-proof atomizers containing no more than 10 mg nicotine (that would be 0.5 ml of 20 mg/ml juice, which would also be the maximum concentration allowed) is just ridiculous, when you think that you can buy a bottle containing 5 liters of bleach in the supermarket... with no 'child-proof' cover!

Parents should be responsible for taking care of their children, and storing cleaning products and e-juice out of their reach - as clearly stated on both product's label. What I cannot stand is lobbies using the "parent's alleged irresponsability to take care of their children" excuse to convince governments to treat me as if I was a child myself!

If my post was taken that I want our right to vape as adults limited or eliminated due to child safety concerns, then I did not do a good job of getting my point across.

We both agree that unlimited freedom is a fairy tale. And unlimited prohibition is unnacceptable. So, what's in between those two extremes? Regulation. Rules that define who can buy things and where they can be used. If I could create an industry that was lightly regulated by local government (e.g. not the Feds) and business owners, but out of the hands of BT and BP, I'd be absolutely 100% all for it. I doubt it's going to play out that way, but that would be my "perfect ending." Make every vendor, hardware maker, juice supplier, etc... conform to the same set of standards for quality and safety, retain the innovation of the community, and educate the non-users about what PV's *really* are and are not, I don't think anyone would complain. Of course you're still going to have people at the extreme ends of both sides - "Ban it all!" and "No regulation at all!" but those people are not being realistic. But, it's why the bell curve is shaped the way it is, every group in every industry has outliers, you just have to learn how to deal with them.
 

Jay-dub

Moved On
Oct 10, 2013
934
1,607
Kansas City, MO
No matter what laws get enacted; no matter what any of us think; people tend to do what they know they can get away with. I get a season pass to the local amusement park every year. It's one way to get my lazy ... out of the house and walking around. Same with the zoo and parks in my area. Anyhow, I haven't been in public anytime in recent memory without seeing people smoking where ever the hell they feel like smoking. I'm prolly not much different. I'll vape where I want to vape but I'll also consider the circumstance and my mood in the situation. Stealth vape, in-your-face vape, informative vape or vape later, depends.
 

wv2win

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Feb 10, 2009
11,879
9,045
GA by way of WV
I actually agree with the ban in places where smoking is not allowed, I didn't smoke in the grocery store, movie theater, etc. why should I vape there. I visited a vape shop where people were blowing clouds and I was not comfortable in there, for me it has nothing to do with whether the vapor is harmful to others or not it bothered my eyes. I also agree with regulation of both the quality of the liquid and the hardware, it should meet some standards of safety.
I actually think cigarettes should be banned completely since they kill so many people, but that's just me. I don't think it is a good idea to be vaping around children because they do what they see adults doing and I don't think vaping is something they need to be doing, I see vaping as a way to stop smoking, even though I enjoy it very much and hope I don't ever have to quit.

Not everyone enjoys or can even tolerate clouds of vapor that does have an odor to many if not most people. I can't smell what I am vaping but others can and forcing others to smell what I am vaping is inconsiderate, whether it is harmful or not.

I also think there should be some regulation of perfume and cologne in public places, too many people must bathe in the stuff and it is more offensive to me that cigarette smoke, which I find very offensive.

And there are many who are offended by just seeing someone vape in their car or in a park or on their front porch even though they can't smell anything. It sets a bad example, renormalizes a behavior they detest and they should not be subjected to it. We shouldn't forget their rights. You really aren't thinking this through when you don't consider their side of the issue.
 

bluecat

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jun 22, 2012
3,489
3,658
Cincy
Then I am currently living in a dream world. Which, philosophically speaking, I don't dispute, but I'm thinking you weren't making a philosophical assertion and instead thinking there aren't places that will permit open vaping. Currently, there are. Hence the Golden Era that I'll reference in my posts from time to time.

Yet, if the fear mongers amongst us get their way, vaping and smoking will always be linked and both will be kept in the column of always bad, and very likely dangerous to children and those who inhale the secondhand stuff.

If by some miraculous event, vaping is not publicly banned, I will be overjoyed. Not just because I vape, but because many of the regulations being put into place have no reason being put there by our government. As a human being I can form my own opinion and do not need a government, who I may add makes mistakes, telling me how to live my life. I personally would rather make my own mistake than being forced to make mistakes under the guise of it is better for me.

Finally a judge ruled against the NSA. It is about freaking time. Our government needs to get a couple notches taken out of it. The House, the Senate and the White House needs to know we are not a monarchy.

It is always about the kids. Any politician that brings up "it's for the children" again will never get my vote.
 

bluecat

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jun 22, 2012
3,489
3,658
Cincy
Caffeine is produced in plants for the same reason nicotine is produced in plants, to act as a natural insecticide.

I don't know if I can produce any documented use of caffeine as an pesticide, but I can produce this...
CAFFEINE IS NATURAL INSECTICIDE, SCIENTIST SAYS - NYTimes.com

Fair enough... it looks like they need more studies done from reading it. Although nicotine is a proven pesticide used since what the 18th or 19th century... doesn't look like caffeine is fitting that. Although it does state that when used in conjunction with a pesticide it enhances the effect. It may be similar to the 5 hour energy and alcohol relation from a prior post.
 

Robino1

Resting in Peace
ECF Veteran
Sep 7, 2012
27,447
110,404
Treasure Coast, Florida
If I'm uncomfortable in a place for whatever reason, I can choose not to visit that place. Let me use malls, at this time of year, as an example. I can choose to shop online and avoid that which makes me uncomfortable. I have a choice. Say there is something I want that can only be bought at that same mall. Yeah, I will go there but do so knowing what the atmosphere will be like. If I am so uncomfortable that this is not an option, I can choose to not buy said item and find something else.

Remember the Cabbage Patch Doll craze? Uh no I did not join in the madness. Should they have banned those dolls? Didn't think so.

On the other hand, maybe I like the excitement of crowds and watching people. I can choose to visit those malls.

Point is, we have choices right now. If the ANTZ have their way, we will NOT. I would not like a world where choices were not an option. The Zealots are so bound and determined to have nicotine not an option for anyone. They see it as a drug that is as addictive as a drug that cannot be named on ECF. Which by the way is a total fallacy. It is their way of further scaring Joe Public into getting rid of smoking/nicotine.

Some of you are too young to remember what it was like back in the days where smoking WAS socially acceptable. We watched what happened with smoking and we are seeing the same patterns today with vaping. This time around, we aren't just blindly believing the lies that they are trying to put out there. This time we DO know the truth and shame on us if we let it happen again.
 

bluecat

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jun 22, 2012
3,489
3,658
Cincy
Jman types into google search "Caffeine AND pesticide" and of the many hits finds this one

Slugging It Out With Caffeine | ScienceNews

Quote from the article


Bold emphasis by Jman

Slugs? You come up with slugs! Common.. Okay I was a raised for a bit on Long Island New York. Back in my teenage years, my dad and step mom had slug issues in there garden. My step mom made the best Spanish coffee in the world. Drank a ton of it. So what did we use to kill the slugs? Let's see salt works but my favorite was beer. It was hilarious to kill them little and not so little thing with NaCl or beer placed in little dishes. My guess.. some pepper or cinnamon or anything will kill a slug.

But yeah I didn't google that.. Apparently caffeine is a pesticide for slugs. Thanks to you and DC2 for correcting me. Now I wonder if it near the same toxicity as nicotine.

What I do find interesting from the article is this

"After working their way through soaps, surfactants, and off-the-shelf pesticides–all without antifrog effects–Campbell's group started to evaluate products in the grocery store, including acetaminophen (Tylenol) and cigarette nicotine. "We had very poor results with almost all of these," "
 
Last edited:

nmackan

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 3, 2013
459
328
Turkiye
My friend, smoking is free. They are freely sold. They dont attract children, They are not harmfull, E-cigarette is. Does this make sense? E-cigarettes provided us to quit smoking yet they say they can make children addicts. But should not they ban cigarettes for the same reason? You may say children under 18 cant buy (I laugh at that) so make them cant buy e-cigs too.
No sir it is the money tax problems they are thinking (and bribery I am afraid). Anyone considering e-cigarettes are harmfull would not allow cigarettes to be produced.
Lets be frank what would you prefer your kids do? Smoke or vape? None is all our choices of course, but since we were smokers and now vapers one way or other they will imitate us.
In my childhood there were chewing gums in the shape of cigarettes. (They would not attract children eh? or was the purpose attract them?) Were they fool then? governors I mean. No my friend look at the money, they say in my country than you can understand what is what. They dont want us to be vapers they want us to be smokers kids grown ups. all other statements are baloney.
 

Baldr

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 14, 2011
1,391
1,671
Dallas, Tx

So the first one is unsubstantiated, the second article is about intentional use as a suicide attempt, and the third isn't about nicotine at all, but someone who OD'd on Fentanyl patches.

The first one is not substantiated. I wouldn't risk it though with my kids, but feel to allow yours to play with your nic bottles.

I would like to point out that I have not advocated handing small children bottles of undiluted nicotine, the way you are pretending. But if the only way you can make your argument is to lie, I suppose that's what you have to do.
 
Last edited:

Anjaffm

Dragon Lady
ECF Veteran
Sep 12, 2013
2,468
8,639
Germany
@jpargana:

No, I do not think so. Trouble is, we are discerning adults, who do not want our right to vape be taken away because of supposed concerns about 'child safety'... no refillable atomizers, only sealed, child-proof atomizers containing no more than 10 mg nicotine (that would be 0.5 ml of 20 mg/ml juice, which would also be the maximum concentration allowed) is just ridiculous, when you think that you can buy a bottle containing 5 liters of bleach in the supermarket... with no 'child-proof' cover!

Parents should be responsible for taking care of their children, and storing cleaning products and e-juice out of their reach - as clearly stated on both product's label. What I cannot stand is lobbies using the "parent's alleged irresponsability to take care of their children" excuse to convince governments to treat me as if I was a child myself!

Thank you!

And I still have more important things on my mind - concerning my own health, my own life and the Big Money of Big Tobacco and Big Pharma to pay Big Bribes to Big un-elected politicians with very deep pockets. So I have no time to bother with "clouds / no clouds - vape here / no vape here - vape there / no vape there - me good / you bad" and things like that.

And those who still have time and leisure to "argue about the emperor's beard" can be very glad that there ARE people who are fighting like crazy, at this very moment, to retain their right to choose a much less harmful way to take nicotine. Against the greed of corrupt politicians. And their deep pockets.

I say it again:
This is war. Right now.
If Europe falls, then the US will fall next.

And then - there will be no reason to argue about the emperor's beard. Because the emperor will have no beard.

Argue about THAT for a while, people. If you wish.

......
And as to "vinegar" - Well, what would you feed people who want to feed you poison? Poison as in tobacco cigarettes? - I know what I would feed them. Precisely what I AM feeding them. We were nice for too long, we were reasonable for too long - and they spit right in our faces. Spreading lies. Feeding their greed at our expense. Enough!

...
edit:
This is, of course, not going against those who are reasonable. You know who you are. :)
But I am sick and tired of victim-blaming and whining.
If Europe falls, then you will all have something to whine about. In the US. Very soon.
Mark my words.

.. And a big THANK YOU for those great vapers in the US who have been supporting our fight in Europe! You rock!

.......
and now.... argue on... while you still can.... bye for now
 
Last edited:

Fulgurant

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 21, 2013
677
2,581
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Some of you are too young to remember what it was like back in the days where smoking WAS socially acceptable. We watched what happened with smoking and we are seeing the same patterns today with vaping. This time around, we aren't just blindly believing the lies that they are trying to put out there. This time we DO know the truth and shame on us if we let it happen again.

It really wasn't that long ago, either. I think that's actually the major disconnect in a lot of discussions like this one; some of us regard widespread public-smoking bans as consequent to an unassailable cultural norm. Others of us believe the opposite -- that the supposed norm came as a result of the bans, without which smoking was, and still would be, the cultural norm.

The former group might understandably question why a vaper can't just abide by the rules governing smokers. It's not like we aren't used to all of the restrictions, and vaping's just an act of self-indulgence anyway. Best not to court controversy, given that the bulk of society now most likely finds smoking offensive, or so the reasoning goes.

The latter group questions the authenticity of the smoking-ban norm, because it's basically only ten years old, and because public support for smoking bans, at least at the outset, was decidedly mixed. Most of us have come to accept the new state of affairs (not including all of the crazy outdoor bans and employment/housing restrictions that are just now starting to rear their ugly heads), but that doesn't mean we believe the state of affairs to be natural or even appropriate in all cases.

Personally, I don't view the presence of cigarette smoke as an a priori nuisance to bystanders. Cigarette smoke may very well be unhealthful, and therefore we can reasonably argue that smokers should avoid exposing people needlessly -- but that's a (subtly-but-crucially) different argument.

I draw the distinction between evidence-based health concerns and presumed principles of courtesy because ultimately we're not discussing cigarette smoke. We're discussing vaping. And there is no evidence to suggest that second-hand vapor hurts anyone except in extremely exceptional corner cases. Quite the opposite, in fact; the evidence suggests that second-hand vapor is harmless.

At some point, we as a society have to decide once and for all whether any smoke-like substance is unacceptable in public regardless of its safety -- whether the in-principle act of indulging in the age-old rite of smoking tobacco (or something like it) really has been or should be denormalized -- or whether we're just concerned about health, which was the basis for pushing denormalization in the first place, after all.

Believe it or not, we haven't settled that issue yet, as a culture. Ten years really isn't a long time; it took much longer for the automobile to kill off the horse buggy, for example, and that was a clear-cut case of technological superiority, not a subjective matter of collective preference. So if you think that vaping in public places is rude, then that's fine; you're entitled to your opinion, and I can't say with any degree of certainty that you're wrong. But please, let us not pretend that the correctness of your opinion is self-evident.
 

patkin

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Nov 6, 2012
3,774
4,141
Arizona USA
Just as I started to post a story came on the news. It was about a group of neighbors getting together and sending an anonymous letter to the home of someone who put up Christmas lights/decorations saying they wanted them taken down. They said it was fine to practice their beliefs in the privacy of their own home but not tasteful to display. Now I can't post what I was going to. I have to reflect on what this world is coming to first.
 

Jman8

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jan 15, 2013
6,419
12,928
Wisconsin
No your cigalike does not do clouds of vapor, but if there were 10, 15, 20 people all sitting there using their cigalikes it would become clouds of vapor. This is not about one person vaping in an enclosed space, it is about a lot of people vaping in an enclosed space, and if one is allowed to do it the rest will follow. The whole thing is about being considerate of others, and the people with dragon breath are as inconsiderate as the smoker, vaper, cologne bather, etc.

Apparently, this is about many things, as you have stated it.

I currently vape openly in places I go. I don't vape everywhere I go, because it sometimes depends on my mood or how harsh I think owner/managers will be if I were caught in middle of puff and how much I'd like to return to that place. But as I have recently vaped in a hospital, openly, there aren't too many places that I think someone could name where I wouldn't give it the ol' college try.

In my experience of public vaping, in biggest metro area in state of Wisconsin, I haven't seen more than 1 vaper in any location I've gone. So, for me, it isn't about how many of us will congregate in places where we are allowed to do it.

Which brings up a bunch of other points. Mainly, it would be better, I think, to have people vaping say in a mall, in various places than it would be to designate a section where clouds will likely happen because theoretically we've crammed 20 vapers into this enclosed space. Also, it would matter what ventilation is like in this space or any space. In a mall, or hospital, or home depot, if me and 20 other vapers, all using cigalikes are roaming the entire property, I'm fairly certain clouds wouldn't form. Yet, get all 20 of us in one area, that is poorly ventilated, and all using cigalikes, and I'll admit that if for some reason we all felt compelled to chain vape at same time, there would be potential for thin cloud, or a haze that would be in the room. I still think it would dissipate a lot faster than same room filled with smokers who were all chain smoking. Yet, in both rooms, if there was good to great ventilation, I'm thinking there would be very little haze even if you had 40 vapers in that room.

Now same scenarios with people that use devices where vapor is meant to go in and come out thick, and I'm guessing (don't really know) that chances are good the haze and clouds would be more substantial in these spaces. I'm still thinking with great ventilation it would be negligible.

Yet, I must say, and will admit a bias upfront, that part of having common sense in vaping community could be to only use cigalikes if going into public space that is enclosed. And not congregating unless establishment does allow vaping but only in designated area. Currently, if I and another vaper were going to some small shop, I probably wouldn't vape, even if my vaping friend chose to. Or if I did, it would be sparse in how much I chose to puff. If I were alone, I'd have a different mindset.

I know you do not even think cigarettes are bad, but I think every smoker at some point in their lives should have to spend quality time with someone who is choking to death in the final stages of lung cancer and realize that cigarettes DO kill many if not most of the people who smoke them over a long period of time and the second hand smoke, while the health problems from same is debatable, does addict the children of parents who smoke around them every day.

All possible. I concede that. I am child of parents who smoked every day around me. Made it to at least age 40 in life and able to get out myself and exercise often. Plus I chose to take up smoking. So, if it is going to kill me, and I'm going to pass away say in my 60's, I'd like a rather unbiased examiner to be as thorough as possible with what are truly factors in my passing, rather than just being lumped in with smoker/ex-smokers cause of how convenient that may be.

I don't think smoking causes death as I feel there is enough examples here on this forum and many other places on this world where people are defying that causal relationship. I think it factors in, but feel there are umpteen other things that factor in as well.

Morever, this has to do with abuse. You are correct that I don't think of smoking as bad because I now live as moderate smoker. So all these wonderful pros for vaping that we vapers bring up, I get to experience. And yet, I am one who, if being honest, has to claim myself as 'smoker' because I've chosen to have at least one in the past week, and probably will have at least one in the next month. But I've seen for many months now that when you don't abuse smoking and go down to around a pack a week or less, all those evil, nasty things that allegedly smoking will undoubtedly do to one's health, isn't exactly accurate with moderate smoking. In my past experience as a PAD smoker, I would say it seems accurate. But other than bottled water, I don't know of any other marketed substance that when abused (taken in heavy doses because one enjoys them that much and feels they need to have it many times a day) isn't actually harmful to your system. I'm thinking I wouldn't want to see a person lying in a hospital bed who ate way way too much guacamole in their life and is now paying the price for that 'addiction.' Yet, I'm still going to enjoy my guacamole binges that I engage in about once ever 2 weeks after seeing / hearing about the poor sap that suffered from guacamole abuse.
 

Jay-dub

Moved On
Oct 10, 2013
934
1,607
Kansas City, MO
Which goes hand in hand with the fact that personally responsibility is a dying concept.

No denying that! Ignorance, naivety, and laziness abound. But just as when you point a finger; you have three more pointing back at you. There are a lot of charlatans out there too. Blaming individuals is only a part of the equation. Individuals don't typically have the resources to invest in behavioral manipulation or systemic misinformation that large corporations do. I don't feel like I'm arguing with you here. Just adding nuance.
 

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
I will have to eliminate this post, because I can't find the smoking gun videos I was looking for.

Suffice to say that thetruth.com is about anything other than truth.
And their commercials are offensive to anyone with a brain and an understanding of the real truth.

The one video that I was looking for went as follows...

Someone is smoking and the smoke travels up and over hill and dale...
And then it comes into you house through a window...
And then it attacks your baby in the crib...

What a load of "truth" crap.
 
Last edited:

bluecat

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jun 22, 2012
3,489
3,658
Cincy
So the first one is unsubstantiated, the second article is about intentional use as a suicide attempt, and the third isn't about nicotine at all, but someone who OD'd on Fentanyl patches.

The first one is not substantiated. I wouldn't risk it though with my kids, but feel to allow yours to play with your nic bottles.

I would like to point out that I have not advocated handing small children bottles of undiluted nicotine, the way you are pretending. But if the only way you can make your argument is to lie, I suppose that's what you have to do.

"I would like to point out that I have not advocated handing small children bottles of undiluted nicotine, the way you are pretending."

I was pretending nothing. I took it as you thought is was as safe as caffeine. My kids have been holding my coffee for me for years. Right or wrong I never had one fear of them getting hurt by the coffee. I can truthfully say they never touch my e liquid.

I am glad to hear that you aren't advocating it, though.


Death is death, man, whether it is an accident or not. You don't get a "do over".
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread