Excellent point, although inexpensive products do get cloned. There isn't as much vanity/exclusivity related to a $30 product as there is with a $100 product.
Spot on.
Load of crap. Just because you can't afford something doesn't mean it's priced too high or that the seller is making an inordinate amount of money. It just means that your job has been so devalued by bad trade policy that you can now only afford products from distorted markets.
How do you define "actual value"?Plus many companies will set their retail price much higher than the actual value
Setting a Price Point Isn't always as Simple as just going with the Highest Price the Market will bear.
If I have a New APV and set the Price at 29.95$ Retail and think I will sell 100,000 Units verses setting the Price at 74.95$ Retail and only sell 40,000 Units, which one will I generate More Profit for me?
But here is a Big Question. Which is More Likely to be Cloned/Counterfeited?
The one being Marketed at 29.95$ or the one at 74.95$?
What is your production, sales, fulfillment and support capacity?
Zero.
Zero.
Zero.
and Zero.
And JSYN, I'm not eLeaf.
You asked the theoretical question. You ignored a huge number of issues that completely change the answer.
You clearly tried to lead the answer, but you came at it strictly from a consumer standpoint.
What is your production, sales, fulfillment and support capacity?
BTW - This Post would have Made More Sense if you had used the word "Costs" and Not "Capacity".
Capacity is a more comprehensive term.
But here is a Big Question. Which is More Likely to be Cloned/Counterfeited?
The one being Marketed at 29.95$ or the one at 74.95$?
I used to think that anything that was priced low and was also good would not get cloned. Then Tobeco cloned the Mutation X that sells for around $25. I've seen the clone at around $12.
There goes that theory![]()