Tonight I am vaping two different tobacco extracts, Virginia Spice and Peter Stokkebye 80 Norwegian blend. A little pipe tobacco and some pg or vg at room temp in a jar. Let it sit for a month and filter. Blend with the unflavored. Good stuff, simple, inexpensive.
This.
How can 'they' even dream of 'banning vaping', when we can vape e-liquid extracted from tobacco itself - something, of course, 'they' will never ban ??
Let's see... I have bought some pipe tobacco. I have paid the person who sold it. I have paid the 'sin taxes' already - that's really the problem with vaping: the loss of revenue...
Written question - Tax revenue from electronic cigarettes - E-004672/2013
From that moment forward, that tobacco is MINE. I could choose to just toss it away, if I wanted to.
Is there ANY law to make me use that tobacco in the WORST possible way - smoking it?
What if I decided to simply chew it? Could authorities prevent me from doing that?
If not, then why cannot I simply make an extract from that tobacco, which is MINE, already paid for and TAXED for, and use it in a much less harmful way - vaping that extract?
Why should BG stick his nose in my personal life? Why should BG get a vote when I make a PERSONAL, ADULT, INFORMED decision to choose an healthier option - for me, and for those around me?