Deeming Regulations have been released!!!!
- Thread starter Oliver
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
Processed food, used daily... ever studied the codex alimentarius ? Really know whas really begind these generalized terms used in the small print ?
'Fresh food' ... hmm... ever wondered about pesticides, herbicides, antibiotics, veterinary pharmaceuticals residue ?
Ever wondered why certain franchised products ( a finite number sold ) don't even spoil ?
Just read another post - Vermont wanting to declare GMO in foodstuff, just so that people know it's in there.
No restrictions, no bans no nothin'. Just letting folks know and choose for themselves. And FDA threatening to take them to court over that...for letting people know 'what's inside'
And you expect the FDA to set standards to keep you safe ? Seriously ?
The same outfit that approved Chantix ?
Even with the odd mod ( tampered with in most cases ) causing grave harm, vaping would have to go on for decades to get anywhere close to the Chantix 'body count'. And to my knowledge, FDA hasn't pulled the plug on that ...
''To them, we are crud''
(Ripley in Alien 3 )
It appears I will need to avoid the news and watch old reruns for awhile. National story on CBS was completely biased, Zeller and the children, no mention of the millions of adult lives electronic cigarettes are saving.
How do these people sleep at night?
How do these people sleep at night?
Innovation stops NOW. It's been crippled for years by the looming of the deeming, and all the deliberately deceiptful misinformation. Vaping itself has been crippled by scaring away vapers, investors and creators.
There would be so many more people vaping, and fewer smoking, had they not messed with vaping before this, and now they're going all out in their war against us improving our lives and our health.
Can we have a admin or moderator put a statement on the front page that summarizes what is actually going to happen with this? I've read three pages of posts on this thread and still cannot clearly understand what is happening. Thx.
It's been a long, bleak day. I'm here in Oklahoma and our local news channels, of course, did their lousy, stupid, ignorant coverage of this FDA ruling....but I did get a cool screen shot (actually took a picture of my TV screen -- LOL) of Congressman Tom Cole's reaction to it all.
Isn't everything "significantly equivalent" to whatever that was out in 2007? I mean, they are all electronic circuit that uses a heating element to vaporize juice. In my opinion, all hardware are significantly similar.
I can understand if they want to regulate juice. But hardware?
I can understand if they want to regulate juice. But hardware?
I don't remember any Democrats signing on to HR 2058. Maybe I've forgotten.
FEB 15, 2007 is the predicate date. Cartos and blus. You won't find a DNA200 anywhere.
Yes, but the predicate product is what I'm asking about. Isn't it the predicate product that anything made after 2007 has to be equivilant to?
What a long, sad day. I'm from Oklahoma, Congressman Tom Cole turf, and I took a screen shot (literally snapped a picture of my TV screen -- Ha) of his reaction to all this mess.
Ah yes, you are trying to use common sense.
That is not in play here.
You should read this and then you'll understand...
FDA issues Brief Summary of Not Substantially Equivalent Determinations delineating why deeming reg would ban all e-cigs
Similar threads
- Locked
