Deeming Regulations have been released!!!!

mikepetro

Vape Geek
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 22, 2013
10,224
81,686
66
Newport News, Virginia, United States
18 dead, 1080 seriously ill. People are dying just because they want to catch a buzz.
Its a problem, a real bad friggin problem.

We are getting thrown out with the bath water because its the excuse they have been wanting for years.
It will drive our market underground.
Then the problem might surface for us too.
 

DarrenMG

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
May 9, 2015
276
914
65
18 dead, 1080 seriously ill. People are dying just because they want to catch a buzz.
Its a problem, a real bad friggin problem.

FastStats

Somehow the CDC, removed the parts about crimes against others, to keep it Teddy Bear friendly, but there are far more deaths and harm.

18? In statistical terms it's the lowest priority.
 

Baditude

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Apr 8, 2012
30,394
73,076
71
Ridgeway, Ohio
Let me clarify, the media is not making laws that affect us. The laws that do affect us are made by lawmakers. Hold your lawmakers accountable for being idiots, blaming the media is just giving them a pass to be idiots.

Yes stuff in the media can be misleading, why again are you giving law makers a pass for being unintelligent? Why give consumers of media a pass? Personal responsibility ... a dead concept.
Some lawmakers are completely science ignorant, but we all know that's not a valid argument against using science when making policies. Wise lawmakers bring in specialists and experts within the industry to help the policy makers make an unbiased decision.

Other policy makers know exactly what they are doing; they have an agenda to destroy the vape industry so Big Tobacco and Big Pharma can recoupe the lost money that vaping has taken from them pertaining to the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement. It's obvious that the states that have the most to gain from the MSA were the first to do either a flavor ban or an all out ban on vaping.

72171808_2611550252444455_8487560601936068608_n.jpg


I had the opportunity to do an interview with Columbus Channel 10 television at the Ohio Rally. The reporter seemed to be pretty aware and sympathetic to vaper's issues. I haven't seen the interview on TV yet, but he informed me that the station was planning on an extended program on vaping in the near future.

I've been seeing more and more unbiased news reporting lately that is showing vaping in a favorable light. Before it was ALL unfavorable to vaping. The media has been using experts who see nicotine vaping as worthwhile harm reduction to help smokers to quit. And that's what the main message should be.

Why this addiction expert says e-cigarettes are 'holy grail' for public health






Gregory Conley on E-Cigarettes and Public Health Concerns

Video | C-SPAN.org

Rep. Duncan Hunter vapes during House hearing
 
Last edited:

Rossum

Eleutheromaniac
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 14, 2013
16,081
105,232
SE PA
It's a tough call. Remember, we're still dealing with bureaucrats. And one thing they hate is having their plans altered. Changing the date earlier means messing up the plans for the whole review process. They have money slotted for 2022 to begin the review, likely with a line for salaries to bring on enough people to process them all, even if every single one is rejected. They have to show they at least made an effort to read them and offer up a lame excuse what the problems with the application are.

Moving it earlier means changes in funding, hiring, printing up forms, getting their database software set to handle electronic submissions (which means whoever they awarded the contract to for development, if that's even been done yet), and so on. I'm not sure the regular employees are too thrilled about anything that may now require overtime to implement. After all, they do just work for the government.
If they don't want to work overtime and their systems aren't ready, they do have an easy out come May 11. Just slap this stamp on every application they receive:

Xrm78pb.png


If I were the FDA Commissioner, that's what I'd do to stick it to Judge Grimm. :laugh:
 

DarrenMG

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
May 9, 2015
276
914
65
If 18 is an epidemic, and 480,000 is not (that is not my number, it is just a number from our government on how many died from smoking every year), then the CDC, FDA, and government in general has lost any sense of the little bit of brains they had left. It's now a company of .......
 
Last edited:

DarrenMG

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
May 9, 2015
276
914
65
Some lawmakers are completely science ignorant, but we all know that's not a valid argument against it. Other policy makers know exactly what they are doing; they have an agenda to destroy the vape industry so Big Tobacco and Big Pharma can recoupe the lost money that vaping has taken from them pertaining to the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement.

A sad but very real possible interpretation. Even when I read through the slog of deeming regulations, it was about huge pay out user fees. I was just shaking my head. Where does all that money go?
 

AttyPops

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jul 8, 2010
8,708
134,349
Hc Svnt Dracones - USA EST
ther policy makers know exactly what they are doing; they have an agenda to destroy the vape industry so Big Tobacco and Big Pharma can recoupe the lost money that vaping has taken from them pertaining to the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement.
I still think they're going after the cigs. But to do that, they need BT to cooperate, and BT needs the "own" the nic market.

TMSA is really short-term and secondary, IMHO.

But I admit I'm guessing.
 

Katya

ECF Guru
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 23, 2010
34,804
120,147
SoCal
Now that's a big deal. If that accelerated PMTA date gets reset to the original "delayed" 2022 date, that's a ton more playing room to deal with all this. Hopefully by then the THC pulmonary thing will have been worked out and not adding fuel to the fire over the risks associated with "vaping".

I'm not so sure, Eskie. They can move that date all they want, and it would be good for us if they did, but the date that really matters is still the grandfather date. As of now, it's still February 2007 and only Congress can change it. And with everything that's going on, I don't see that happening. Which means that, sooner or later, only products that were on the market in February 2007 and before will be grandfathered in--unless they get approved by the FDA. Every mod, drip tip, TC, tanks, eliquid, Kanthal wire, new coils, pods, everything will need its own application. :facepalm:
 

Katya

ECF Guru
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 23, 2010
34,804
120,147
SoCal

AttyPops

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jul 8, 2010
8,708
134,349
Hc Svnt Dracones - USA EST
It sounds like horsepoo.

However, it does say this:
Sales of unflavored vaping products would continue. But if in the coming weeks or months investigators connect ingredients in those products to lung injuries, the state will have to immediately ban them, too, the governor’s order says.

IDK how in her mind she's linked flavorings to the contaminant issue, but who knows? Further reason why the CDC needs to get this locked down.

She DID NOT say it was a "save the children" move that I saw. So this is directly vilifying flavorings as being implicated in these illnesses.

This. Makes. No. Sense.

The other stuff is a sham, but at least there's a sort-of-logic to it...if you really believed that flavoring is what is causing the youth vaping "epidemic". But this?

I. Don't. Understand.
 

Sloth Tonight

CF Moderator
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 25, 2014
7,879
51,681
NY
Still chuckling over @Sloth Tonight post. Fecking gold. LOL!

Genius man, you captured it all in one meme. Brilliant. Get that up on twitter!
Haha, I found it on reddit. Wish I could take credit because it really is golden.
 

Users who are viewing this thread