I look at it as being one factor of many.
As explained by Bryan in his presentation. (paraphrasing) - look at the virus as a chain, and there are weak links that are vulnerable to heat, humidity, sunlight/uv. The 'other links' are quite strong.
I look at it as being one factor of many.
But I think it was the Lesser of Two Evils. And as was Mentioned, the US Populace doesn't/wouldn't have had the Stomach to go down the Other Road.
I cannot agree that it was the lesser of evils but agree completely that the populace lacks the stomach to do otherwise.
View attachment 881759
I cannot agree that it was the lesser of evils but agree completely that the populace lacks the stomach to do otherwise.
View attachment 881759
Maybe a few years down the road someone will run the numbers and figure out what the best choice would have been. Or review how things worked out around the world with all the different choices that were made. Or different States in America. But everyone was stumbling around in the dark when it started. And still are really.
In Hindsight, an Argument could be made that it wasn't. But that goes for Many things in Hindsight.
But, as you say, the Populace would Not have Tolerated just letting things Run their Course, then really there Wasn't an Option.
And someone told me once... "When there is Only One Option, it Doesn't Really Matter if it is Good or Bad."
I don't know that it'll all be hindsight. I'll admit, I vacillated a lot on this one, and I'm sure I'm not alone: From overblown hype, to wow, look at those number go up- this could be really bad. Then, why aren't we hearing more real science- surely they've been testing this thing since the new year? Then, mid March- 13th (when my business was shut down), to be exact - I told my wife: "I'm not afraid of this virus, but I'm really afraid of the response." I think it was March 10th that a metro Atl county closed their all schools because a single teacher was infected. They were supposed to open in a couple days, but never did. By 3/13, all other county schools were closed, without a single other infection. NONE of those kids contracted the virus, of course.In Hindsight, an Argument could be made that it wasn't. But that goes for Many things in Hindsight.
But, as you say, the Populace would Not have Tolerated just letting things Run their Course, then really there Wasn't an Option.
And someone told me once... "When there is Only One Option, it Doesn't Really Matter if it is Good or Bad."
Yes, I think you are correct. I'm not a Republican, nor a Trump lover, but I have to say I love the fact that he's not a career politician.Brusardo still doesn't get it though either. The CDC and WHO see nothing any clearer now than they've ever seen it. This has never been about health or teen epidemics. It is now and has always been about power and money. 2 sides of the same coin.
The minute that vaping was framed in terms of a quasi medical smoking cessation method, it landed squarely in the crosshairs of those in power who stand to lose vast astronomical piles of money if it delivers on it's promise.
If it had been promoted as an adult "vice", just like smoking and alcohol or even junk food, it would have been treated just like smoking and alcohol or even junk food.
vaping was banned decades before there was even such a thing as vaping because looooong before vaping became a thing, the citizens of this country surrendered the very rights that Brusardo mentions.
Why?
Because they blindly trusted that the blood sucking power mongering parasites they vote into office actually care about them and their children.
Ironically, and in ways that are personally surprising to me, Donald Trump may be at least somewhat of an exception because he is not a career politician. He thinks like a private sector businessman and actually has a sense that what he does as president he will one day soon have to live under as a once again private businessman. Yes, he clearly loves the power and position, but being president, a politician, does not define his life like it does the rest of these people.
Juul. It's all their fault really. If we just carried on, as you phrased it as "a dismissible "hobby"", we wouldn't have been noticed nor really cared about. More folks would have quit ciggies and enjoyed vaping.It's amazed me how so many could suspend disbelief to conceive that the necessary outlays and allocations to protect the consumer right could be dispensed with. Without a market there is no business.
Had we persisted as a dismissible "hobby", an artisanal quirk of diy juice makers and modders, the industry could have grown like clover underneath it all. It's ubiquitous acceptance as prevalent as smoking ever was. Objections to it as evidently absurd to all as they are in practice to us.
As I've often said, vaping is more like cooking than most anything else that we do. And who would presume to outlaw cooking?
Good luck all.![]()
The press make Trump’s misgivings seem mild by comparison to theirs.Yes, I think you are correct. I'm not a Republican, nor a Trump lover, but I have to say I love the fact that he's not a career politician.
He isn't always right in his beliefs nor his actions, but I've given up on the other folks in office. Just wish he could tame his mouth a teeny bit more.
To your first question: I don't think so, since the unemployment and all its follow on stuff would not have happened.If we had done the Alternative, and just let things run their course, wouldn't there have been an Economic Catastrophe anyways?
And wasn't the Prevailing Thinking (at the start) that if this Virus is going to die back when the weather get's warmer, then we can Preserve Essential Services like Hospitals/EMT's if we can Slow the rate of Infection?
I disagree. If we had simply suggested to the folks who were most at risk [the stats worldwide are perfectly clear that it's people with one or more underlying medical issues, and maybe those 70+] that they were in danger and that if they wish to self-quarantine then we would arrange for food/meds delivery to them. It would have cost us a fraction of the trillions which have been spent, and the economy would have moved along as always. Instead, I'm very concerned.That's the Problem. What might work in Cascade County Montana isn't going to work in NYC. Or Detroit. Or LA. Or ...
A Visa Versa.
But anyway you Slice it, there was going to be an Economic Collapse. So we Can't really say that if we had just done ______, all this could have been avoided.
(Not say'n that you said that.)
We're certainly on the poster, but you can also look at the EU for an over-regulation poster mate.Over-regulation is crippling and damaging to every aspect of a country and it's citizens' liberties. America is the poster-boy for this.
You are, IMHO, correct. The numbers of deaths are not way out of line with the deaths for the common flu this flu season.I don't know that it'll all be hindsight. I'll admit, I vacillated a lot on this one, and I'm sure I'm not alone: From overblown hype, to wow, look at those number go up- this could be really bad. Then, why aren't we hearing more real science- surely they've been testing this thing since the new year? Then, mid March- 13th (when my business was shut down), to be exact - I told my wife: "I'm not afraid of this virus, but I'm really afraid of the response." I think it was March 10th that a metro Atl county closed their all schools because a single teacher was infected. They were supposed to open in a couple days, but never did. By 3/13, all other county schools were closed, without a single other infection. NONE of those kids contracted the virus, of course.
Then before March was over, I was saying they were using a sledgehammer on this thing, when some tweezers would be more appropriate (see a little more focus on high risk people/areas/contact tracing). And I couldn't believe the shutdown kept growing, in spite of relatively small percentage of deaths. And I couldn't believe how long it took before I started hearing other voices asking about what this would do to the economy.
And now here we are, when anyone says that a balance should be struck between health concerns and the economy, we're back into 2 separate camps, and branded selfish, stupid science deniers.
I disagree. If we had simply suggested to the folks who were most at risk [the stats worldwide are perfectly clear that it's people with one or more underlying medical issues, and maybe those 70+] that they were in danger and that if they wish to self-quarantine then we would arrange for food/meds delivery to them. It would have cost us a fraction of the trillions which have been spent, and the economy would have moved along as always. Instead, I'm very concerned.
I disagree. If we had simply suggested to the folks who were most at risk [the stats worldwide are perfectly clear that it's people with one or more underlying medical issues, and maybe those 70+] that they were in danger and that if they wish to self-quarantine then we would arrange for food/meds delivery to them. It would have cost us a fraction of the trillions which have been spent, and the economy would have moved along as always. Instead, I'm very concerned.
That's how any recovery is done, frankly. Always. You have to spend your way out of a depression or recession.Recover? No problem.