In the CASSA form, it will automatically select your politicians based on your address.You're doing what? How? Why? Please explain--before you leave!!!
Yeah, before you know it people will start getting crazy ideas and acting on their own, like trying to create more petitions
I know, I'm asking about his changing the "From" email address.
Because the staff at these places might start to recognize the return email address and just start hitting delete without reading it. I figure if it comes "from" different addresses it "might" have more of a chance to get read.I have 2....
But what's the purpose of doing it? Sorry, I'm a bit dense.
Yeah, before you know it people will start getting crazy ideas and acting on their own, like trying to create more petitions
I really do wish the advocacy groups would spend some more time here on ECF. There might be more people on fb, but there are a lot of folks here who are incredibly dedicated and willing to take action.
Since the new forum switch over, we no longer have access to doing banners. They quit notifying us about CTA's.They tried, for years. There were crickets creating nests in their sub-forum. All advocacy short of FDA calls, which are limited to a single front page thread to contain the craziness, has been buried deep in the forum, and everyone was too busy doing hand checks and comparing atty notes to notice.
Since the new forum switch over, we no longer have access to doing banners. They quit notifying us about CTA's.
I always thought official CTAs, from all countries, should have been allowed in the general area, but all my opinion and a couple of bucks will get you is a cup of coffee.
Well, it's not as if it all requires discussion. Post the CTA's or what people need to be aware of, and then the discussion happens in other threads. Open discussion of everything isn't always ideal. Finding relevant information in the FB group involves a lot of wading through nonsense.They tried, for years. There were crickets creating nests in their sub-forum. All advocacy short of FDA calls, which are limited to a single front page thread to contain the craziness, has been buried deep in the forum, and everyone was too busy doing hand checks and comparing atty notes to notice.
if there was only one then that's the one that took 5 years for approval
Yes, beyond 8/10/16, new products must pass nearly impossible requirements. The ammendment to the House Appropriations bill, same problem. But better than undoing nearly a decade of innovation, without a change in the cutoff date of 2/15/2007.
Look up H.R 2058. It's Representative Tom Cole's House Resolution to change the grandfather date.
HR 2058 is a bill to change the grandfather date, the date before which products don't need to apply for pre-market review, to the date when the deeming regulations go into effect. So everything on the market now would not have to retroactively go through the review process. The amendment to the budget bill pretty much does the same thing. It wouldn't exempt the products from all regulations, but removes the bureaucratic hurdle that would eliminate most products.
