Deeming Regulations have been released!!!!

SeniorBoy

VapeFight.com Founder
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 21, 2013
1,738
5,170
Las Vegas, NV
vapefight.com
BTW - We need to have the ECF Re-Instate stevegmu.

If he was here, he would Tell Us that Everything is going to be fine.

Their was one other whatever you want to call it. Yea Baker as Kent mentioned but the ? used to enjoy pounding on you, me, and some of the regular long time activist. I can't recall his screen name but I would sure recognize his avatar. MIA! HA!
 

Lessifer

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 5, 2013
8,309
28,986
Sacramento, California
Wow, it takes awhile to get caught up here.

That's not what I'm saying. Stuff already on the shelves or supplied from elswhere that was mixed before the August date is OK.

And the only part I'm certain of, is that mixing is manufacturing. I hate all this pretending that one thing is really another, just by FDA's saying so.
Don't forget that re-packaging is also "manufacturing" so if you're a shop that buys all of your e-liquid bulk from china and slaps a new label on it, with your shop name, you're a manufacturer.

You should probably roll a bunch of the tips out on the floor in front of babies to make sure they aren't attracted to them.
Choking hazard! Drip tips need to come in CRP and should not be less than 2 inches in diameter.

See the last bullet point...
Retailer Overview of FDA Regulations for Selling Tobacco Products

Rules for Sales of E-Cigarettes and Other Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems

Some examples of ENDS include e-cigarettes, vape pens, e-hookahs, e-cigars, personal vaporizers and electronic pipes.
  • Check photo ID of everyone under age 27 who attempts to purchase e-cigarettes or other ENDS.
  • Only sell e-cigarettes and other ENDS to customers age 18 and older.2
  • Do NOT give away free samples of e-cigarettes or other ENDS, including any of their components or parts.
  • Do NOT sell e-cigarettes or other ENDS in a vending machine unless in an adult-only facility. 3
  • Beginning in 2018, do NOT sell or distribute e-cigarettes or other ENDS without a health warning statement on the package.1
  • Beginning in 2018, do NOT display advertisements for e-cigarettes or other ENDS without a health warning statement.1
  • If you operate a vape shop that mixes or prepares liquid nicotine or nicotine-containing e-liquids, or creates or modifies any type of ENDS, you are considered a tobacco product manufacturer and must comply with all of the legal requirements for tobacco product manufacturers.
As I noted to nicnik above, that includes modifying the packaging, or combining of products, so possibly even putting an atomizer and mod together?

Out of curiousity, has anyone tried the NKTR line of TFN based e-liquids?
Since 0mg liquid is considered a tobacco product component, I assume non-tobacco nic liquid would be as well. May not need all of the warning labels, but still subject to the regulations as a whole.

The FDA knows that these.requirements will stop innovation. They're stupid, but not so stupid as to not know that. It's what they want. If this had been in place a year ago and every manufacturer and juicemaker had submitted the required paperwork.for every change and innovation, the FDA couldn't have processed them all before the next millennium. Nope, they want a very few closed systems if for no other reason than.it would then be a manageable situation.
They're not worried about having enough staff to deal with the backlog of applications because they're not expecting a backlog of applications. I believe they've even stated that they only expect less than 10% of the current products to be submitted.

Those folks at the FDA must be pretty good actors not to have shown their hand
in these closed door meetings. If any of the .orgs that had a closed door meeting
with the FDA and had any kind of heads up on what we were in for they had better
have a good explanation.


Now that I have had time to mull this over some more I believe the FDA can do this and
it is in the regulations. I haven't been wearing my tinfoil hat for couple of days so forgive
me for not thinking of this sooner.

The part where they say each blend of juice no mater how minor the change is
considered a new product. Bingo. Most of the shops i have seen that make juice behind the
counter use big squeeze bottles pre filled with bases and pretty much just eyeball it.
Ergo,there is the minor change the FDA refers to in the reg.'s. This also has the extra
added benefit for the FDA to have a hidden extra form of regulation to add further
regulatory burdens that are not in the regulations. All the juice will have to be made
with automated computer precision bottling equipment to insure compliance.

Now that my tinfoil hat is on i feel confident I will not be so lackadaisical with
my assessments in the future. I should be getting my fifth gold sticky star
as soon as the next Republican is elected President.
:2c:
Regards
Mike
Your amounts need to be exactly the same, as does your supply line, every ingredient in your liquid needs to be verifiable as being exactly the same as it was before, as does your packaging down to the ink colors used.

All I saying is if was an e-Liquid Seller, and was planning on being in Business after the 90 Day Grace Period was over, I would Consider being Very Proactive about Legally Documenting Exactly what is in the e-Liquids I am Currently Selling.

Because the FDA has made it Very Clear that they have No Problem of running Most out of the e-Cigarette Market. And if it comes down to what You Say alone, I Don't Think the FDA will be giving many passes based on the Honor System.
There will be no more hand mixing, remember that every cigarette is manufactured to be identical to every other cigarette of that type, that's the level of control needed and expected.
 

nicnik

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 20, 2015
2,649
5,220
Illinois, USA

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,624
1
84,752
So-Cal
Their was one other whatever you want to call it. Yea Baker as Kent mentioned but the ? used to enjoy pounding on you, me, and some of the regular long time activist. I can't recall his screen name but I would sure recognize his avatar. MIA! HA!

There have been Many over the Years who have said that "Deeming" would Never amount to anything. If it even Ever happened.

Most would just Say their piece and then Move On. And that is OK. Don't Agree with it. But they are Entitled to their Opinions.

But there have been a Few, who have Openly Advocated that Vaper's should Do Nothing. And that Advocacy is a Waste of Time.

It to those that I say... "For they sow the wind, and they shall Reap the Whirlwind."
 

Lessifer

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 5, 2013
8,309
28,986
Sacramento, California
On another note, I just received a coupon in the mail for MarkTen's new XL product, twice the battery life!

Looks about the size of an eroll, and the carto appears to be female threaded, as opposed to the 510 threading on their original. Self contained, proprietary... someone's prepared.
 

Woofer

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Oct 8, 2014
3,894
15,371
PA, SK, CA
If you're referring to 100mg/ml nicotine being in many more homes, which I think you are, I agree. I have some, and it doesn't come close to the danger of some of the everyday household products under my kitchen sink, that don't even have childproof packaging.

Yes that is exactly what I am referring to. Very disappointed with @Bill Godshall and his opinion on this. :facepalm:
 

nicnik

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 20, 2015
2,649
5,220
Illinois, USA
On another note, I just received a coupon in the mail for MarkTen's new XL product, twice the battery life!

Looks about the size of an eroll, and the carto appears to be female threaded, as opposed to the 510 threading on their original. Self contained, proprietary... someone's prepared.
It's about the size of KR808.
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,624
1
84,752
So-Cal
On another note, I just received a coupon in the mail for MarkTen's new XL product, twice the battery life!

Looks about the size of an eroll, and the carto appears to be female threaded, as opposed to the 510 threading on their original. Self contained, proprietary... someone's prepared.

Yeah... I'm sure this sound Tin Foil Hat esk. But No One can Tell me that the Big 3 did not know how the PMTA Requirements would be written.

And I'm sure that All 3 are well on their way to Completing their New Product Submissions.
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,624
1
84,752
So-Cal
But proprietary connection, which is a definite plus. For Altria.

nicnik. Haven't you seen the Recent CDC Study that showed that Teens who used a 510 Connector are 72% More Likely to Start Smoking than those who use a Proprietary Connector?

;)
 

Shawn Hoefer

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 21, 2015
11,191
49,147
58
Arkansas Ozarks
nicnik. Haven't you seen the Recent CDC Study that showed that Teens who used a 510 Connector are 72% More Likely to Start Smoking than those who use a Proprietary Connector?

;)
14-19 using 510 are more likely to try 420 unless 86ed or 187ed.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N910A using Tapatalk
 

Lessifer

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 5, 2013
8,309
28,986
Sacramento, California
Yeah... I'm sure this sound Tin Foil Hat esk. But No One can Tell me that the Big 3 did not know how the PMTA Requirements would be written.

And I'm sure that All 3 are well on their way to Completing their New Product Submissions.
No tin foil hat required, what I don't understand is all the shock. We've ALL known how the PMTA requirements would be written for at least two years, longer once you realize they are functionally identical to cigarette PMTA requirements.
 

wiredlove

Master Lurker
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 2, 2010
394
1,320
KY
No tin foil hat required, what I don't understand is all the shock. We've ALL known how the PMTA requirements would be written for at least two years, longer once you realize they are functionally identical to cigarette PMTA requirements.
No one really wants to believe that their government no longer cares about them until they get the governmental "Dear John" letter and many weren't around or had forgotten about the 09 go around with the feds.

Anyhoo, I'm pretty sure that the FDA wants to break up with us.
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,624
1
84,752
So-Cal
No tin foil hat required, what I don't understand is all the shock. We've ALL known how the PMTA requirements would be written for at least two years, longer once you realize they are functionally identical to cigarette PMTA requirements.

I think what the Shock was, at least for Me, was Not that there would be PMTA Requirements, as you Mentioned, anyone who has Followed this knew that there would be PMTA requirements.

The Shock was that what the FDA has Released is Worse, Much Worse, than what they have Previously Eluded to. And in light of what the UK's Health Ministry have released, the FDA's actions seem to Fly in the Face of Current Science.

I really Wonder if it would be Easier to bring a New Cigarette to Market vs. an e-Cigarette Product?
 

Lessifer

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 5, 2013
8,309
28,986
Sacramento, California
No one really wants to believe that their government no longer cares about them until they get the governmental "Dear John" letter and many weren't around or had forgotten about the 09 go around with the feds.

Anyhoo, I'm pretty sure that the FDA wants to break up with us.
To me it feels a bit more like a young hottie(FDA) married to a rich person with terminal cancer(US). "No, no, honey, don't try those newfangled treatments that everyone says are working, they're all just nonsense. I'm sure this next round of chemo will work, after all, 6th times the charm!"
 

Lessifer

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 5, 2013
8,309
28,986
Sacramento, California
I think what the Shock was, at least for Me, was Not that there would be PMTA Requirements, as you Mentioned, anyone who has Followed this knew that there would be PMTA requirements.

The Shock was that what the FDA has Released is Worse, Much Worse, than what they have Previously Eluded to. And in light of what the UK's Health Ministry have released, the FDA's actions seem to Fly in the Face of Current Science.

I really Wonder if it would be Easier to bring a New Cigarette to Market vs. an e-Cigarette Product?
Well, there was that ONE... for snus, that PROVED that the pathway is viable. How much did that one cost Swedish Match?
 

wiredlove

Master Lurker
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 2, 2010
394
1,320
KY
To me it feels a bit more like a young hottie(FDA) married to a rich person with terminal cancer(US). "No, no, honey, don't try those newfangled treatments that everyone says are working, they're all just nonsense. I'm sure this next round of chemo will work, after all, 6th times the charm!"

Don't forget that she's also colluding with her two other boyfriends, Big Tom and Big Phil, because she's a gold-digger.
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,624
1
84,752
So-Cal
To me it feels a bit more like a young hottie(FDA) married to a rich person with terminal cancer(US). "No, no, honey, don't try those newfangled treatments that everyone says are working, they're all just nonsense. I'm sure this next round of chemo will work, after all, 6th times the charm!"

To me, it is more like This...



Just replace the words "Mr. Beale" with "e-cigarettes" every time it is said.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread