Deeming Regulations have been released!!!!

mudram99

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 6, 2014
1,537
7,809
South Jawja, United States
And I LIKE it.

I saw one person-of-knowledge once state that every single American violates at least three laws every day of our lives. Not all the SAME three, mind you, but instead the point is that it's pretty much impossible not to.

I do not know if there's any truth to this, nor do I care to analyze it. But I believe that it plays to your point too, @ENAUD.
And that ain't even counting the intentional ones! ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: DPLongo22

mudram99

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 6, 2014
1,537
7,809
South Jawja, United States
I agree. I think we'll end up with age restrictions, packaging requirements, etc and, of course, taxes.
Man I wish I could make myself believe youse guis thinking this is gonna work out are right, but alas so far you're basing it on the misconception of common sense prevailing! That scares the beejeezus outta me! :(
 

Rossum

Eleutheromaniac
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 14, 2013
16,081
105,232
SE PA
I would much rather have the fight in the future boil down to taxes over available products than have to fight for products to even remain available.
Have you considered that this might actually be Leviathan's strategy -- to make the taxes that they really want seem much more palatable in comparison to the defacto ban that is the dooming regulations?

Besides, as the usual excuse for high taxes on cigarettes revolves around harm reduction by decreasing use (even though they love using that money for other purposes) it would be possible to challenge if they do not place the same taxes on other nicotine replacement systems like gum or patches. If they taxed those like a tobacco product, it would completely undermine any attempt to justify the tax as for the benefit to public health, which is the usual excuse, and not just a money grab.
Although I don't think they're heavily taxed, the price of other NRT products is already pretty dang high --- comparable to the cost of smoking.
 

Bronze

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 19, 2012
40,240
187,930
Man I wish I could make myself believe youse guis thinking this is gonna work out are right, but alas so far you're basing it on the misconception of common sense prevailing! That scares the beejeezus outta me! :(
I base it on past cases. I think these regulators know they are not going to get all they want (due to administration change, legislation, or litigation). So they ask for more and settle for less.
 

ENAUD

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2013
9,810
64,089
Bordertown of ProVariland and REOville
And they'll tax it at a level so we'll be paying what we were spending on cigarettes. They know what we are willing to pay for our habit. It's amazing how stupid politicians are about business until it affects their cash register
You mean, like taking a thriving industry that would have been so easily brought into the tax scheme, and decimate it via ridiculously impossible to comply with regulations. It's actually kind of laughable if you look at it in those terms. One hand of government wanting so badly to tax a growing industry, and the other hand of government off on a zealous quest killing that same thriving industry.
 

Rossum

Eleutheromaniac
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 14, 2013
16,081
105,232
SE PA
where is my damm order form??? :drool:
Sorry, but you'll have to wait until August. The point is to bring it to market right after the regs go into effect, when according to the regs, it would require a PMTA if it actually were a tobacco product.
 

SeniorBoy

VapeFight.com Founder
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 21, 2013
1,738
5,168
Las Vegas, NV
vapefight.com
I sent Senator Johnson a thank you thing. I'm all for "hope" and for everyone to continue fighting for our rights in a manner and fashion of their choosing.

Having said that, perhaps the following slice of data will add some measure of texture to some views of Senator Johnson. He is running for reelection in 11/16:

"The 2016 United States Senate election in Wisconsin will take place on November 8, 2016, to elect a member of the United States Senate to represent the State of Wisconsin, concurrently with the 2016 U.S. presidential election, as well as other elections to the United States Senate in other states and elections to the United States House of Representatives and various state and local elections.

Incumbent Republican Senator Ron Johnson is running for re-election to a second term in office. Former U.S. Senator Russ Feingold, who Johnson narrowly unseated in the 2010 midterm Tea Party wave, is seeking a rematch for a fourth non-consecutive term in office.[1]"
Source

I remain very very skeptical of his move, given the fact that he is running for reelection, I could argue that his real motive is publicity and using this publicity to enhance his re election campaign. Even though I thanked him. Even though I support and admire all those who see a measure of hope in this action.

Respectfully yours,

SeniorBoy aka "takin it to the streets" /lol /joke

EDIT: I even have a theme song: "Takin' It To The Streets"



/a little humor to brighten your day :)
 
Last edited:

mudram99

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 6, 2014
1,537
7,809
South Jawja, United States
Have you considered that this might actually be Leviathan's strategy -- to make the taxes that they really want seem much more palatable in comparison to the defacto ban that is the dooming regulations?


Although I don't think they're heavily taxed, the price of other NRT products is already pretty dang high --- comparable to the cost of smoking.
Well I have from the get go believed wholeheartedly that it was all money oriented, just havn't really thought of ALL the ways they are frothing at the mouth planning to collect it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nicnik

Rossum

Eleutheromaniac
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 14, 2013
16,081
105,232
SE PA
When there are so many laws on the books that no man knows at any time if he is in violation of a particular law, there is in fact, no law, just lawlessness.

HaHa, I just made that up :)
Others have had similar thoughts before:

There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.
-- Ayn Rand
 

classwife

Admin
Admin
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 9, 2010
98,564
161,088
68
Wesley Chapel, Florida
I was thinking more along the lines of:

OMG-Juice!
No Nicotine!
Not made from tobacco!
Not a tobacco product!


If you want the bull to charge, you have to wave the red flag around some.


I wouldn't even mention a thing about nicotine...nada...total separation.



:)
NOT ANOTHER DIME !

NOT ONE DIME !
 

mudram99

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 6, 2014
1,537
7,809
South Jawja, United States
I base it on past cases. I think these regulators know they are not going to get all they want (due to administration change, legislation, or litigation). So they ask for more and settle for less.
The art of negotiating! I pray that is it for all the yet to be vapors!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bronze

WillyZee

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 23, 2013
9,930
36,929
Toronto
they basically want vaping products that are successful with helping folks quit smoking ... off the market.

it's not the children they are trying to protect ... it is their smoking customers they are trying to keep smoking.

the regs are as simple and straight forward as that :blink:
 

Jingles

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 18, 2011
2,503
9,908
Ohio
Have you considered that this might actually be Leviathan's strategy -- to make the taxes that they really want seem much more palatable in comparison to the defacto ban that is the dooming regulations?


Although I don't think they're heavily taxed, the price of other NRT products is already pretty dang high --- comparable to the cost of smoking.
Yep, the cost of the NRT's on the shelf at my local Wal-Mart always deterred me from even trying them back when I was a smoker. Hmm-a $6.00 pack of smokes or a $35.00 box of patches? I stuck with the devil I knew! Of course now, I've spent tons on vaping, but vaping is fun and pleasurable. Nic gum made me dizzy the one time I tried it. It definitely wasn't fun!
 

Bronze

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 19, 2012
40,240
187,930
they basically want vaping products that are successful with helping folks quit smoking ... off the market.

it's not the children they are trying to protect ... it is their smoking customers they are trying to keep smoking.

the regs are as simple and straight forward as that :blink:
th
 

bobwho77

Super Member
ECF Veteran
May 8, 2014
753
2,404
Ypsilanti mi
This is the Difference of what an Oversight Committee does. It doesn't/Isn't based on Public Opinion. It is Based on if an Agency has Overstepped its Authority.

Not say'n that Public Support Isn't going to Help Us. Of Course it is.

But don't give up All Hope yet.

Not giving up hope, but we're going around in circles about two pieces of legislation that at BEST lock the status quo, and practically halt any further development. The oversight committee may be able to help, but Congressional action takes time, that we don't really have
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lessifer

HBcorpse

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2013
4,378
14,477
I honestly feel like they targeted the vaping industry so specifically, that the surveys we've been filling out are bought and paid for by the FDA or BT.

We thought we were helping our cause and each other, but we were giving them the blueprints of our own doom.

You might think it's impossible, but the FDA regs are a VERY clear indication that money talks.
 

Users who are viewing this thread