Deeming Regulations have been released!!!!

Lessifer

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 5, 2013
8,309
28,986
Sacramento, California
just...just...

they have ABSOLUTELY NO idea how large the business end of e-cigs is :facepalm:

:lol:


NO idea at ALL !
They know exactly how large they WANT the business of e-cigs to be.

'The purpose of the review of PMTAs is to ensure that new tobacco products are appropriate for the protection of the public health. However, FDA acknowledged in the PRIA that premarket submission requirements could lead to significant product exit and reduced entry. As we note in Table 12 of the PRIA and the associated discussion, a reduction in the supply of electronic cigarettes could under some conditions yield negative health benefits.
In particular, if, going forward, electronic cigarettes are proven safer than other tobacco products and are substitutes for other tobacco products, and if the effect of premarket requirements on the supply and price of electronic products were large enough, then the welfare effects of a reduction in supply of electronic cigarettes due to the rule could potentially be negative.

Counterbalancing this, however, is that the PMTA requirement helps ensure that new tobacco products are appropriate for the protection of the public health."

thumbnail_cat%201_zps22vwqbqv.jpg
"We're here to protect the public health. We recognize that if e-cigs are a positive for public health and we destroy the industry, that could be bad for public health. Don't worry, once the industry is down to what we choose it to be, we'll let you keep a few vapor products, in the interest of public health."
 

YoursTruli

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 27, 2012
4,406
14,895
Ohio
I have to believe the FDA does know the scope of the ecig market in the US, it is not difficult information to accrue, but, providing accurate numbers would show a much greater impact on the economy by the deeming regs which is not to their benefit. They are also doing this low numbers game to the premium cigar industry.
 

The Ocelot

Psychopomp
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 12, 2012
26,497
79,193
The Clock Barrens, Fillory
Yes they Do.

And that is what makes this Whitewashing such a Sham.

You have a point. That's one reason Sen. Johnson is trying to get them to backup their misleading statements about economic impact.
 

Mazinny

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 25, 2013
4,263
22,713
NY
They know exactly how large they WANT the business of e-cigs to be.


"We're here to protect the public health. We recognize that if e-cigs are a positive for public health and we destroy the industry, that could be bad for public health. Don't worry, once the industry is down to what we choose it to be, we'll let you keep a few vapor products, in the interest of public health."
I think that's the gist of it ! I was about to type in many more words to express that sentiment, but you did it in far less.
 

The Ocelot

Psychopomp
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 12, 2012
26,497
79,193
The Clock Barrens, Fillory
What do you mean ? Do you mean that big tobacco will dominate the market, or do you mean that BT will make the decisions in re the market ?

I think BT will overtly dominate the market and covertly try to influence regulations that are profitable for them.
 

Lessifer

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 5, 2013
8,309
28,986
Sacramento, California
I think that's the gist of it ! I was about to type in many more words to express that sentiment, but you did it in far less.
Have you ever seen the movie "Cube" ? Aside from being a great movie, there's a fantastic point about bureaucracy in there.
Quentin: Why put people in it?

Worth: Because it's here. You have to use it, or you admit it's pointless.

Quentin: But it, it *is* pointless.

Worth: Quentin... that's my point.

I really don't think the FDA is "evil" although some of the leadership definitely is. I'd say the agency as a whole is misguided. Give people this great mission, protect the public health, and they will do what people will do and distort that because it never goes far enough. Then things become an organism unto themselves and it just feeds and feeds, and if you're an employee you either have to go along with it, or you get swallowed up. They need a course correction, and it will not come from within.
 

Mazinny

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 25, 2013
4,263
22,713
NY
I think BT will overtly dominate the market and covertly try to influence regulations that are profitable for them.
Yeah possibly. If nothing changes in the next two to three years, it will be Bt and probably a half dozen big vape companies in the market, each with a few products. We will go from over ten thousand different eliquids for example down to probably less than a hundred, most likely in a closed system only.
 

Mazinny

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 25, 2013
4,263
22,713
NY
Have you ever seen the movie "Cube" ? Aside from being a great movie, there's a fantastic point about bureaucracy in there.


I really don't think the FDA is "evil" although some of the leadership definitely is. I'd say the agency as a whole is misguided. Give people this great mission, protect the public health, and they will do what people will do and distort that because it never goes far enough. Then things become an organism unto themselves and it just feeds and feeds, and if you're an employee you either have to go along with it, or you get swallowed up. They need a course correction, and it will not come from within.
Agreed. 100 %
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,619
1
84,742
So-Cal
You have a point. That's one reason Sen. Johnson is trying to get them to backup their misleading statements about economic impact.

And in this Bizarro world we live in, that Economic Impact will be considered More heavily than the issue of Depriving Smokers of Harm Reduction via e-Cigarettes.

But either way, the FDA needs to be Slapped Down. So keep getting People and Retailers to Write Letters.
 

crxess

Grumpy Ole Man
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 20, 2012
24,438
46,126
71
Williamsport Md
'The purpose of the review of PMTAs is to ensure that new tobacco products are appropriate for the protection of the public health. However, FDA acknowledged in the PRIA that premarket submission requirements could lead to significant product exit and reduced entry. As we note in Table 12 of the PRIA and the associated discussion, a reduction in the supply of electronic cigarettes could under some conditions yield negative health benefits.
In particular, if, going forward, electronic cigarettes are proven safer than other tobacco products and are substitutes for other tobacco products, and if the effect of premarket requirements on the supply and price of electronic products were large enough, then the welfare effects of a reduction in supply of electronic cigarettes due to the rule could potentially be negative.

Counterbalancing this, however, is that the PMTA requirement helps ensure that new tobacco products are appropriate for the protection of the public health."

thumbnail_cat%201_zps22vwqbqv.jpg

It's not an e-cig debate; it's a nicotine debate.

Zeller has often cited his position that the public health problem isn't nicotine, it's the delivery mechanism for the drug. During his panel, the director elaborated further on this notion.
Five Fresh Insights into Tobacco Regulation
:facepalm:

Does not matter that it may be Good or Bad, it is Not in Zellers Play Book.:ohmy:

"People have said we should treat nicotine like caffeine," said Zeller. "I'm not there yet, but I do agree we have to think about it differently."

Nor is he likely ever to be.....:glare:

Notice he loves using I, over We..........that all important, I am finally a God, attitude.:-x
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,619
1
84,742
So-Cal
Yeah possibly. If nothing changes in the next two to three years, it will be Bt and probably a half dozen big vape companies in the market, each with a few products. We will go from over ten thousand different eliquids for example down to probably less than a hundred, most likely in a closed system only.

And Isn't that Exactly what BT wants? Limited Competition.

And if the Entire US e-Cigarette market falls on it's face, so what. People will just keep Smoking Cigarettes. Cigarettes made by... wait for it... Wait for it.... BT.

This Whole thing Reeks. And I don't know how Califf and Burwell can Sleep at Night.

:facepalm:
 

Mazinny

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 25, 2013
4,263
22,713
NY
And Isn't that Exactly what BT wants? Limited Competition.

And if the Entire US e-Cigarette market falls on it's face, so what. People will just keep Smoking Cigarettes. Cigarettes made by... wait for it... Wait for it.... BT.

This Whole thing Reeks. And I don't know how Califf and Burwell can Sleep at Night.

:facepalm:
BT wants what any other business wants. To make more money. Whatever strategy they think leads to more money, that's the route they will take.
 

Lessifer

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 5, 2013
8,309
28,986
Sacramento, California
image.jpeg
And Isn't that Exactly what BT wants? Limited Competition.

And if the Entire US e-Cigarette market falls on it's face, so what. People will just keep Smoking Cigarettes. Cigarettes made by... wait for it... Wait for it.... BT.

This Whole thing Reeks. And I don't know how Califf and Burwell can Sleep at Night.

:facepalm:
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,619
1
84,742
So-Cal
BT wants what any other business wants. To make more money. Whatever strategy they think leads to more money, that's the route they will take.

No Arguments here. BT is doing what it has done for a Long Time. And they are Very Good at it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread