Athough, two of those tobacco execs said they believed "smoking" is not addictive.
It's not unreasonable to believe that they would hold those opinions.
Especially as to regards to nicotine which was supposed to be the cause
of the addiction. All this was the result of BT processing the tobacco.
To make a Marlboro a Marlboro no mater where the tobacco was grown,
the conditions it was grown under and other things that would affect
the product they processed the tobacco in such away it would always
be the same Marlboro where ever or when ever you bought one.
It would taste,look and smell the same. One of the first process was
to strip and refine most all of the nicotine out of the leaf and add it back
later to precisely control the amount of nicotine in each cigarette. I
believe they actually had it down to the puff. Other processes controlled
taste and texture etc. . The right amount of each process produced the
tobacco that makes a Marlboro a Marlboro and not a Winston. This is
the reason you can't even call your cigarette mild,regular or strong.
They don't want to public to know or understand that BT was not
trying to make cigarettes more addictive,they were conducting
quality control measures and giving customers what they wanted.
I go as far to even speculate that maybe these processes might in fact
have made the addiction of smoking more powerful but for the fact BT
never hid what they were doing. When asked for documents they freely gave them.
This is what we do to the tobacco. Check this out isn't it kinda neat.
Some in the industry most likely did believe everything their detractors said
about cigarettes was true. Just as many or more did not. I have watched
this whole thing unfold for over 50 years. I have witnessed the rise of the
evil,lying,deceitful,greedy murdering BT. From what I remember at one time the
majority of non-smokers didn't believe all of it either back in the day.
It's interesting to note all these accusations about what BT did or didn't
do are all after the fact. Where was the finger pointing before BT did all
these things they are accused of doing before they did them? I am not
aware of one source of anyone telling BT not to do this because this
will happen.

Regards
Mike