Deeming Regulations have been released!!!!

VNeil

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 30, 2014
2,726
6,868
Ocean City, MD
With at least some indications that never smokers that try e-cigarettes are not as likely to get addicted to just the nicotine becoming habitual users and the likely scenario if the deming hands the market to BT how long before they start adding in the addictive additives to hook their next generation of customers.
Just pure speculation here but I'm convinced BT knows exactly what those additives are and exactly why cigs are addictive but nic alone is not.
 

beckdg

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 1, 2013
11,018
35,706
TN
I don't want to be accused of negative exaggeration. Gives me room to debate. :)
Very logical and prudent given people's aversion to truth until it's too late.

People just want to believe everything is rose petals, cake and ice cream.

Some of us realize there's way more thorns than flowers and cake and ice cream cause diabetes and heart disease when we overindulge.

Tapatyped
 

MyMagicMist

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 28, 2014
1,159
2,465
53
?! IMHO I will never understand why people assume that any vendor would do such
a thing. There are laws against this.Civil,fraud,misrepresentation,etc. . Criminal if
it causes harm.

Well, if they do create prohibition then it is all illegal, ergo the vendors can / do as they want until caught / charged. Funny how it doesn't apply to Big tobacco, or Big Gov, Big Pharma, Big Agri, Big Finance --- Capital.
 

crxess

Grumpy Ole Man
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 20, 2012
24,438
46,126
71
Williamsport Md
And here I thought Oz was a free country...But since I don't smoke...
What I want to know is whether your government is trying to do to vapers what our government is doing...and whether they're bothering to at least kiss you first...

No Guns, soon No Smokes and Sharks Guarding the Waters........Free, nope, Still a Prison colony:ohmy:
 

HazyShades

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
Jan 7, 2015
1,918
18,134
Sandbox, USSA
You're giving WAY too much credit, I'm afraid.

No less than 99%, I'd presume.

The most politically informed people I have ever met in person have never read a bill they're barking about. All regurgitating rhetoric and catch phrases you only learn by watching someone else's spin on what's going on on the boob tube.

Never once have I heard "in section b of article 127.73, it clearly states blah blah and references federal penal code 263.2 section 1, subsection b through d to do so... and THAT'S why I maintain that candidate X who pushed for that particular amendment to the bill is Y and has earned my vote".

Voting records are useless unless you read the bill.

Because as we see here... voting AGAINST "saving the children" from flavor is the righteous way to proceed...

Therefore voting records are a farce behind a shroud of untruths that could only HOPE to one day be half truths and washed of their sinful cloak.

Tapatyped

way too much credit. If anybody doubts that perhaps they should remember what Jonathan Gruber, Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor who served as a technical consultant to the White House during the design of Obamacare had to say about American voters.
Obamacare architect: We passed law due to ‘stupidity of the American voter’

The above combined with a constant barrage of disinformation
and propaganda results in people voting with fear instead of intelligence. However, in deference to r1's opinion that the stupidity
of "We the People" is subject for discussion in another thread or forum
I'll let it slide...
 

YoursTruli

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 27, 2012
4,406
14,895
Ohio
From the ABillionLives FB page:

A Billion Lives
3 hrs ·
The battle in the US has begun!

Last night we had a private screening for members of Congress, their staff & others fighting to save lives.

Thanks to the American Civil Rights Union, Institute for Liberty, Hispanic Leadership Fund & Frontiers of Freedom for making this happen.

‪#‎ABillionLives‬
 

crxess

Grumpy Ole Man
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 20, 2012
24,438
46,126
71
Williamsport Md
From the ABillionLives FB page:

A Billion Lives
3 hrs ·
The battle in the US has begun!

Last night we had a private screening for members of Congress, their staff & others fighting to save lives.

Thanks to the American Civil Rights Union, Institute for Liberty, Hispanic Leadership Fund & Frontiers of Freedom for making this happen.

‪#‎ABillionLives‬

Beat me again! :D

Best thing I've heard in 2 years............Now to find out who attended and their reactions.:glare:
 

YoursTruli

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 27, 2012
4,406
14,895
Ohio
Beat me again! :D

Best thing I've heard in 2 years............Now to find out who attended and their reactions.:glare:

They are saying about 100 showed up and Aaron did give a quick speech before and Q&A afterwards.

and this related FB post:
Texas E-cigarette & Vaping Association
16 hrs ·
Just watched "A Billion Lives" and it blew my socks off. One billion lives is how many people cigarettes have killed this century.

I wonder if they were at the private screening or had one of their own.
 

skoony

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jul 31, 2013
5,692
9,953
70
saint paul,mn,usa
Just pure speculation here but I'm convinced BT knows exactly what those additives are and exactly why cigs are addictive but nic alone is not.

I am sure you are right because this has been understood since the mid 60's.
They knew this by comparing the nicotine levels of pipe and cigar smokers
with those smoking cigarettes. The majority of pipe/cigar smokers do not
inhale. Most all cigarette smokers do. The dependency level of smoking was so
much higher in cigarette smokers even though depending on how the cigar/pipe
smokers smoked and, quantity smoked at a single time often obtained comparable levels
of nicotine in their systems. The link was those pipe/cigar smokers that did inhale
were more likely to become dependent on tobacco. The one that didn't inhale no
mater the amount in their systems were more likely not to become dependent.
Edit, These results were not from BT testing.
:2c:
Regards
Mike
 

Bronze

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 19, 2012
40,240
187,930
From the ABillionLives FB page:

A Billion Lives
3 hrs ·
The battle in the US has begun!

Last night we had a private screening for members of Congress, their staff & others fighting to save lives.

Thanks to the American Civil Rights Union, Institute for Liberty, Hispanic Leadership Fund & Frontiers of Freedom for making this happen.

‪#‎ABillionLives‬
Noticeably absent is the ACLU. But then they act almost exclusively at the pleasure of left wing causes only.
 

VNeil

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 30, 2014
2,726
6,868
Ocean City, MD
I am sure you are right because this has been understood since the mid 60's.
They knew this by comparing the nicotine levels of pipe and cigar smokers
with those smoking cigarettes. The majority of pipe/cigar smokers do not
inhale. Most all cigarette smokers do. The dependency level of smoking was so
much higher in cigarette smokers even though depending on how the cigar/pipe
smokers smoked and, quantity smoked at a single time often obtained comparable levels
of nicotine in their systems. The link was those pipe/cigar smokers that did inhale
were more likely to become dependent on tobacco. The one that didn't inhale no
mater the amount in their systems were more likely not to become dependent.
Edit, These results were not from BT testing.
:2c:
Regards
Mike
Not sure where you're going with that?
 

skoony

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jul 31, 2013
5,692
9,953
70
saint paul,mn,usa
Not sure where you're going with that?
It's been general knowledge in the scientific,governmental and,private sectors
that nicotine was not the problem for a long time. That is why those execs at
the committee hearings got blind sided. They had every reason to rationally
believe nicotine wasn't addictive and or if it was it wasn't addictive enough
to be the reason for people to keep smoking. This is the insidious nature of
what we are up against. There isn't any proof indicating if nicotine itself
is addictive and if it is how addictive is it. In clinical trails when nicotine was
administered as a medicine those that never used tobacco did not develop
any dependency. Conversely those that smoked cigarettes did not reduce
their consumption because of the extra nicotine they were getting nor increase
their usage to make up for the nicotine once the treatments stopped.

In all humbleness to tell the truth all I know is I smoked for 38 years.
Why did vaping work so well? Who knows. My guess it's a combination
of the toxins built up over 38 years and my body's recognition of the
nicotine. The reduction of toxins over time weaned me off cigarettes and the
nicotine along with the ritual aspects of mimicking smoking acted as
a placebo and or a combination of all of these. Your guess is as good as
mine.
:2c:
Regards
Mike
 

crxess

Grumpy Ole Man
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 20, 2012
24,438
46,126
71
Williamsport Md
In all humbleness to tell the truth all I know is I smoked for 38 years.
Why did vaping work so well? Who knows. My guess it's a combination
of the toxins built up over 38 years and my body's recognition of the
nicotine. The reduction of toxins over time weaned me off cigarettes and the
nicotine along with the ritual aspects of mimicking smoking acted as
a placebo and or a combination of all of these. Your guess is as good as
mine.
:2c:
Regards
Mike

Probably one of the Best answers anyone could hope to give. :thumb:

:cool:
 

VNeil

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 30, 2014
2,726
6,868
Ocean City, MD
It's been general knowledge in the scientific,governmental and,private sectors
that nicotine was not the problem for a long time. That is why those execs at
the committee hearings got blind sided. They had every reason to rationally
believe nicotine wasn't addictive and or if it was it wasn't addictive enough
to be the reason for people to keep smoking. This is the insidious nature of
what we are up against. There isn't any proof indicating if nicotine itself
is addictive and if it is how addictive is it. In clinical trails when nicotine was
administered as a medicine those that never used tobacco did not develop
any dependency. Conversely those that smoked cigarettes did not reduce
their consumption because of the extra nicotine they were getting nor increase
their usage to make up for the nicotine once the treatments stopped.

In all humbleness to tell the truth all I know is I smoked for 38 years.
Why did vaping work so well? Who knows. My guess it's a combination
of the toxins built up over 38 years and my body's recognition of the
nicotine. The reduction of toxins over time weaned me off cigarettes and the
nicotine along with the ritual aspects of mimicking smoking acted as
a placebo and or a combination of all of these. Your guess is as good as
mine.
:2c:
Regards
Mike
I well understand that nicotine by itself is not addictive. I wasn't sure where you were going over the inhaling issue as some causal link to dependency.

I too am unsure why vaping works but I too believe the mimicking of smoking is s major factor. I really enjoyed the act of lighting up and smoking. I learned to really enjoy the act of vaping. I enjoy dripping because for me it mimics lighting up a smoke.

I am very sure I went through some very tough withdrawal, peaking on day 4, when I quit smoking. I believe it was chemical in nature. I never want to go through that again. So I can never smoke again. Not one puff.
 

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
What they are trying to do, is one of the biggest crimes ever committed against people's health, on the largest scale ever.

Vaping came on so fast ... they are now desperate :glare:
For those that were here way back in the day, we remember how it was.
You had to be very motivated and persistent to try and stick with electronic cigarettes.

I'm sure the powers that be were watching.
I don't think they were all that worried at the time.

And yeah, the rapid innovation probably caught them a little off guard.
 

KODIAK (TM)

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 31, 2014
1,898
4,983
Dead Moose, AK
The biggest problem e-cigarettes has is that people inhale them and a cloud is exhaled. To the uninformed, it mimics smoking too much so, therefore, it has to be bad. Patches and gum do not have this image problem.
I've said before, this is THE ONLY problem people have with vaping. All the junk science, heart string pulling for the kiddies is just smoke and mirrors carefully crafted to change a "behavoir". Behavior that mimics smoking so well the sanctimonous, arrogant, snobbish, holier-than-thou .......s just don't want to look at it. Society has done such a good job of engineering anti-tobacco thought through demonization over these past 40 years that it's now spilled into vaping. And what better way to fuel this prejudice than to "magically" proclaim it as tobacco?
 

Bronze

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 19, 2012
40,240
187,930
I've said before, this is THE ONLY problem people have with vaping. All the junk science, heart string pulling for the kiddies is just smoke and mirrors carefully crafted to change a "behavoir". Behavior that mimics smoking so well the sanctimonous, arrogant, snobbish, holier-than-thou .......s just don't want to look at it. Society has done such a good job of engineering anti-tobacco thought through demonization over these past 40 years that it's now spilled into vaping. And what better way to fuel this prejudice than to "magically" proclaim it as tobacco?
I wish vaping produced butts so I could throw them on their lawn. :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread