I just noticed that the fiberglass driveway markers I bought a few years ago have a proposition 65 warning on them.
Deeming Regulations have been released!!!!
- Thread starter Oliver
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
I just noticed that the fiberglass driveway markers I bought a few years ago have a proposition 65 warning on them.
Great, I hope you succeed. Do you think they'd have the same agglomeration of idiots sitting around with those same childish expressions of horror and concern at what a liar their esteemed Dr. JJ is?
I just noticed that the fiberglass driveway markers I bought a few years ago have a proposition 65 warning on them.
And have been found by the state of California to cause cancer no doubt.....lol Please do not smoke or ingest them....
From here: Bill Text - SBX2-7 Tobacco products: minimum legal age.
...
Nowhere in there does it say that signature upon delivery is sufficient.
Remember that even though the state of California allows the sale of ____ with a prescription, it's still federally illegal, and people are not being prosecuted because the administration is choosing to not enforce.You sure? Ever heard of sanctuary cities?
What a bloody mess.
This is what I've been wondering...
What happens when someone who supplies one of your flavor components...
Makes an ever-so-slight tweak to their recipe?
Last edited:
Well, at least they made military exempt. Ronald Reagan wouldn't have. Didn't for alcohol anyway.
The way I read the deeming regs they would need to submit a new application for -any- change.
EDIT: At 400K a pop I wouldn't be making very many changes....
Right. However:
(1) (A) Before enrolling a person as a customer, or distributing or selling, or engaging in the nonsale distribution of, the tobacco product through any of these means, the distributor or seller shall verify that the purchaser or recipient of the product is 21 years of age or older. The distributor or seller shall attempt to match the name, address, and date of birth provided by the customer to information contained in records in a database of individuals whose age has been verified to be 21 years or older by reference to an appropriate database of government records kept by the distributor, a direct marketing firm, or any other entity. In the case of a sale, the distributor or seller shall also verify that the billing address on the check or credit card offered for payment by the purchaser matches the address listed in the database.
My reading--any seller can do this provided they have the said customer's name, shipping and billing address, cc number, and age. Right? I don't know exactly how they are supposed to this, but there must be a way, because, otherwise, why would this option be included?
Hence, only (B) If the seller, distributor, or nonsale distributor, is unable to verify that the purchaser or recipient is 21 years of age or older pursuant to subparagraph (A), he or she shall require the customer or recipient to submit an age-verification kit.
Discuss.
Right, I believe that means they have to use an actual age verification service like LexisNexis, but I'd say the majority of online vendors don't actually use ANY age verification at this point.Right. However:
(1) (A) Before enrolling a person as a customer, or distributing or selling, or engaging in the nonsale distribution of, the tobacco product through any of these means, the distributor or seller shall verify that the purchaser or recipient of the product is 21 years of age or older. The distributor or seller shall attempt to match the name, address, and date of birth provided by the customer to information contained in records in a database of individuals whose age has been verified to be 21 years or older by reference to an appropriate database of government records kept by the distributor, a direct marketing firm, or any other entity. In the case of a sale, the distributor or seller shall also verify that the billing address on the check or credit card offered for payment by the purchaser matches the address listed in the database.
My reading--any seller can do this provided they have the said customer's name, shipping and billing address, cc number, and age. Right? I don't know exactly how they are supposed to this, but there must be a way, because, otherwise, why would this option be included?
Hence, only (B) If the seller, distributor, or nonsale distributor, is unable to verify that the purchaser or recipient is 21 years of age or older pursuant to subparagraph (A), he or she shall require the customer or recipient to submit an age-verification kit.
Discuss.
So, right now, if they don't use one of those services, they would be required to request an "age-verification kit" or they can't legally sell to people in California. At least that's my interpretation.
And how is this going to be enforced, pray tell?
You're going to have agents running tests on every bottle of eliquid sold in the country?
Is that what "a database of individuals whose age has been verified to be 21 years or older by reference to an appropriate database of government records kept by the distributor, a direct marketing firm, or any other entity" means? Sorry, it's not clear to me.
Thought it would be Texas
They've had the most signatures on petitions, than any other state. Hawaii and Alaska have similar movements to secede.
Wondering if a PMTA approved product could be a 'predicate' for an SE request?? There is some indication of it in some of the guidance docs, but not clear enough to cite :- )
And how is this going to be enforced, pray tell?
You're going to have agents running tests on every bottle of eliquid sold in the country?
Actually no I really don't think there will be heavy inspections. In such a scenario many vendors might be tempted to just keep quiet hoping to avoid paying the additional business busting PMTA fee and those choosing to do so would likely get away with it....at least for awhile. But if a disgruntled former employee (or ex-spouse/lover/business partner/rival etc..) reports the heinous "crime" the vendor would be investigated and could end up charged with knowingly committing a federal felony (or two or three). In America odds are they would end up becoming part of the incarceration statistic for the U.S. (1 out of every 115 adults) costing taxpayers around $50K per year to house for the next 5 to 10.
Similar threads
- Locked
