I was responding Qews call for a march I didn't quote it right. This thread is moving so fast you don't have time to respond properly.
The "guy" who beat the FDA in 2009 was njoy and Smoking Everywhere (Soterra). The lawsuit had nothing to do with this situation, in fact, that lawsuit is partially responsible for the situation we're in now.Any words on upcoming lawsuits from vape shops or the guy who beat the FDA in 2009? I read somewhere he's going to take it to them again this time.
So are sudifed and anhydrous ammonia. You need to present an ID to purchaseThey may say that, but inforcing it is another matter all together. Flavoring, PG, and VG are used in millions of other non-vaping products already on the market.
Don't forget to add that at the time, we only had two choices. Tobacco (which was NOT under the FDA's thumb) or a Medical device (which Was under the FDA's thumb).The "guy" who beat the FDA in 2009 was NJOY and Smoking Everywhere (Soterra). The lawsuit had nothing to do with this situation, in fact, that lawsuit is partially responsible for the situation we're in now.
In 2009, the FDA seized shipments of e-cigarettes claiming that they were medical devices without FDA approval. Two companies (Soterra and NJOY) took them to court, and won. In that case, Judge Leon states that e-cigarettes are not a medical device, and that the only way the FDA has any "potential" to regulate them was as tobacco products.
Fast forward today, the FDA has done just that... regulated them as tobacco products.
In brick and mortar shops yes. I imagine most will buy online (from overseas if necessary). Then the burden of proof falls on the accusers, and doing this on an individual by individual basis is far too cost prohibitive if we are only looking at end users (and not larger-scale manufacturers trying to sell on the black market).So are sudifed and anhydrous ammonia. You need to present an ID to purchase
these and by doing so you are stating you are not using these for illegal
purposes. These requirements may not be in this set of regulations but,
if DIY gets out of hand they will be.
Seeing that no one has pointed out a specific exclusion for DIY as there is with beer
and wine one may assume at this point anything is possible.
Mike
See my post #1383. Kills two birds with one stone.Mike, indeed. Constructive possession. For instance, in the gun world, merely possessing parts to convert a weapon (e.g. AR-15) from simi- to full-automatic can be a felony.
I mentioned earlier the page 222 quote. I've still contend that the FDA has left it open to stop the whole "buy zero-nic eliquid, then add your own nic later" situation. I think, realistically, enforcing this would be very difficult.
There is historical precedence. The Viet Nam protests frightened Richard Nixon so badly he ultimately committed the criminal acts that forced him from office.You think the storming the streets in Washington is going to make them come out and say maybe we should reconsider?
It will be impossible to enforce, those components are also used in other industries.
I was leaving it up to you all and what you want to pay. Amazon : search for wine preserver gas. You can also buy it from some chem places in a larger quantity that is 99.999% pure, but shipping is usually prohibitive as they ship it as a hazardous material. (amazon does not ship it as hazmat even if you buy multiple bottles) It's not dangerous but in -very- large quantities, in a sealed room, it could drive the oxygen out and suffocate you.
Amber bottles are about the same. Amazon, check the reviews. The smaller they are the stronger they'll probably be... same with price. The more expensive ones will be thicker. I use 250ML mainly to offset cost. You could certainly go smaller, and I've seen people recommend that - 2 reasons, 1) less likely to have a loss due to breakage and 2) you aren't messing with as much base at any single time - less exposure to air/heat/light.
Had to take chantix before surgeries the side effects are horrible the meds comes with never ending side effectsTHIS
599 Additives that Can Be Found In Cigarettes
is a list of the nearly 600 additives that the FDA has approved for use in cigarettes
THIS
List of cigarette smoke carcinogens - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
is a list of known carcinogens in cigarette smoke.
and THIS
Chantix Side Effects in Detail - Drugs.com
is an FDA approved medication for smoking cessation.
but we have to be sure that VAPING is safe?
I know that some of said that signing any more petitions is a complete waste of time. This is likely true. After all, they have not paid attention to the ones you already sign. However, this might be due to the fact that it takes 6 months to get 100000 signatures squeezed out of more than two million vapers! The latest petition has been up since the 5th and has only 50000. It only takes 30 seconds. I know that this will take time out of your busy hand check posting schedule, but really...
I mean, and I'm likely preaching to the choir here, if you can't be bothered to sign a petition that takes 30 seconds how the f*** are you going to take time out of your busy schedule to write a letter or email to your representative that might take 5 or 6 minutes?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N910A using Tapatalk
19 year old kids were being sent off to die in a unjust war ..the is completely differentThere is historical precedence. The Viet Nam protests frightened Richard Nixon so badly he ultimately committed the criminal acts that forced him from office.
Again - If Congress does NOT see the Desire to make change, FROM the PEOPLE, it will NOT Act.
Only the actions of the people can Sway Congress to make a change like this.![]()
The "guy" who beat the FDA in 2009 was NJOY and Smoking Everywhere (Soterra). The lawsuit had nothing to do with this situation, in fact, that lawsuit is partially responsible for the situation we're in now.
In 2009, the FDA seized shipments of e-cigarettes claiming that they were medical devices without FDA approval. Two companies (Soterra and NJOY) took them to court, and won. In that case, Judge Leon states that e-cigarettes are not a medical device, and that the only way the FDA has any "potential" to regulate them was as tobacco products.
Fast forward today, the FDA has done just that... regulated them as tobacco products.
Again - If Congress does NOT see the Desire to make change, FROM the PEOPLE, it will NOT Act.
Only the actions of the people can Sway Congress to make a change like this.![]()
Then either no internet sales,(face to face only) or, you will have to provide proofIn brick and mortar shops yes. I imagine most will buy online (from overseas if necessary). Then the burden of proof falls on the accusers, and doing this on an individual by individual basis is far too cost prohibitive if we are only looking at end users (and not larger-scale manufacturers trying to sell on the black market).
At first glance I thought you said Stalin.."I saw Satan laughing with delight..."